| Date |
Text |
| 2015-11-24 16:16:01 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED |
| | 11.17.15, FROM ANDERSON ARCHITECTURE, INC, TO THE CITY |
| | OF WEST PALM BEACH, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE |
| | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING ADDITIONALL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 1. IS THE SCREENING FOR THE HITTING CAGE FIRE |
| | RETARDENT? |
| | |
| | THE APPLICANT PROVIDED THAT IT IS NOT AND HAS A MELTING |
| | POINT OF 482 DEGRESS F. THE APPLICANT IS STRONGLY |
| | ENCOURAGED TO RESEACH AND INSTALL A FIRE RETARDENT |
| | SCEEN OR APPLY A FIRE RETARDENT MATERIAL ONTO THE |
| | SCREEN FOR FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY PURPOSES. THE POTENTIAL |
| | FOR A RAPID BURNING SURFACE AREA IS EXTREMELY HIGH IN |
| | THE EVENT THE SCEEN WERE TO INTERACT WITH A IGNITION |
| | SOURCE, I.E. A BICK BUTANE HAND LIGHTER FLAME BURNS AT |
| | 600 DEGREES. THE SCREEN WILL FAIL AND MELT AROUND |
| | ANYONE WHO IS UNDER IT. |
| | |
| | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES |
| | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT |
| | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 2. NO SMOKING SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE FRONT OF |
| | THE HITTING CAGE. |
| | |
| | ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 3. A FIRE EXTINGUSIHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH SIDE |
| | OF THE FRONT OF THE HITTING CAGE. |
| | |
| | ADDRESSED |
| | |
| |
Print |
