| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-14 09:25:28 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 10/14/15 |
| | |
| | 1. SITE PLAN NEEDS TO DEPICT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS |
| | VERSUS EXISTING CONDITIONS ON SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2. SITE PLAN NEEDS TO ACCURATELY DEPICT SIDEWALKS. |
| | PROPOSED PLAN SHOWS LANDSCAPING IN LOCATION OF EXISTING |
| | SIDEWALK ALONG BROADWAY. ACCESS TO PUBLIC SIDEWALK WILL |
| | NEED TO REMAIN. THERE IS ALSO A BUS STOP LOCATED ALONG |
| | THE BROADWAY SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 3. SITE PLAN INDICATES THE ENTIRE SITE IS CONCRETE. |
| | SURVEY ONLY SHOWS CONCRETE WHERE CAR WASH BAYS ARE |
| | LOCATED AND SOME ASPHALT LOCATED AROUND THE SOUTHERN |
| | BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY ON SITE PLAN WHAT IS EXITING |
| | AND WHERE NEW CONCRETE IS BEING PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 4. DIMENSION DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS AND INDICATE IF NEW |
| | CURB CUTS ARE PROPOSED OR EXISTING. |
| | |
| | 5. DEPICT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF ALL OFF-STREET |
| | PARKING, LOADING, AND OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS |
| | INCLUDING ADA PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A PARKING |
| | CALCULATION (ZLDR SEC. 94-221(F)(1)) AND STANDARD CITY |
| | DETAIL FOR STRIPING PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 7. LABEL ON SITE PLAN FENCE LOCATION VERSUS PROPERTY |
| | LINE LOCATION AND ACCURATELY DEPICT LOCATION, TYPE, AND |
| | HEIGHT OF FENCE AND INDICATE WHETHER THE FENCE IS |
| | EXISTING OR PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 8. INDICATE LAND USE AND ZONING OF THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS SPLIT LAND USE AND |
| | ZONING WHICH NEEDS TO BE DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 9. INDICATE ON SITE PLAN THE PROPOSED USE OF EACH |
| | BUILDING AND SETBACKS. |
| | |
| | 10. LETTER FROM COMCAST INDICATES THERE IS AN EXISTING |
| | EASEMENT AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN 56TH |
| | STREET AND 57TH STREET, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO EASEMENT |
| | SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 11. HOW IS TRASH COLLECTION BEING HANDLED FOR THE SITE? |
| | WILL THERE BE A DUMPSTER OR OTHER TRASH CONTAINERS? |
| | OUTDOOR TRASH CONTAINERS SHALL BE SCREEN IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH ZLDR SEC. 94-444(C). PLEASE DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 12. IS THIS A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH OR FULL-SERVICE CAR |
| | WASH? IF SELF-SERVICE, WILL THERE BE AN ATTENDANT |
| | PRESENT DURING HOURS OF OPERATION? WHAT ARE THE |
| | PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION? PLEASE EXPLAIN OPERATION. |
| | |
| | 13. IF ONLY ENTRANCE IS FROM 56TH STREET INDICATE HOW |
| | STACKING WILL BE HANDLED SO VEHICLES DO NOT BACK-UP ON |
| | TO BROADWAY. |
| | |
| | 14. WILL ANY NEW LIGHTING BE ADDED TO THE SITE? IF YES, |
| | PROVIDE LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR |
| | ILLUMINATION. |
| | |
| | 15. WILL THERE BE RETAIL SALES ON THE SITE? IF YES, |
| | INDICATE WHERE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SPACE. |
| | |
| | 16. ARE ANY TYPES OF BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS BEING |
| | PROPOSED? |
| | |
| | 17. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ALL ADDITIONAL |
| | STANDARDS IN ZLDR SEC. 94-273(D)(46). THERE ARE 12 |
| | STANDARDS AND ONLY 1 THRU 3 WERE ADDRESSED DIRECTLY ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 18. PLEASE NOTE THE SITE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ITEM 1 AS |
| | INDICATED. THE BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS 15.07 |
| | FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND 100 FEET IS |
| | REQUIRED. A WAIVER HAS BEEN REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 19. THE SITE ALSO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SUBSECTION 3.IV. |
| | WHICH REQUIRES BUILDINGS TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 25 |
| | FEET FROM A RIGHT-OF-WAY. A WAIVER REQUEST WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 20. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE APPLICATION COMPLIES WITH |
| | SUBSECTION 8, REQUIRING AN OPAQUE FENCE NEXT TO A |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 21. APPLICATION SHOULD INDICATE WHAT TYPE OF MITIGATION |
| | IS PROPOSED FOR WAIVER REQUESTS TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF |
| | THE CAR WASH ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREA. OTHER |
| | SITE IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS REMOVAL OF THE CHAIN-LINK |
| | FENCE ALONG STREET FRONTAGES WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED, TO |
| | BRING THE SITE CLOSER INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT |
| | CODE SHOULD BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE PROPOSAL. |
| | |
| | 22. IN AN OVERALL REVIEW OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED, |
| | STAFF'S SUPPORT FOR A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL IS NOT |
| | EXPECTED. |
| | |
| | 23. IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NOVEMBER 5, 2015 |
| | ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING, COMPLETE REVISED PLANS |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN OCT. 22, 2015. PLEASE |
| | NOTE, THAT SUBMITTAL OF THE REQUESTED |
| | INFORMATION/REVISIONS MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
