| Date |
Text |
| 2017-09-20 10:25:26 | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL |
| | DETAILS WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | PROCESS. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED |
| | PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | - SHEET A-201 ? REMOVE 90 DEGREE PARKING SPACE DETAIL |
| | AND REPLACE WITH PARALLEL PARKING DETAIL. |
| | - THE ADA PARKING SPACE ON BUNKER IS NOT ACCESSIBLE. |
| | PREFERABLY THE PARKING SPACE SHOULD BE 13? WIDE AND A |
| | 60" WIDE ACCESS AISLE MUST BE PROVIDED. DETAILS OF |
| | ACCESSIBLE ON STREET PARALLEL PARKING SPACES CAN BE |
| | FOUND AT: |
| | HTTPS://WWW.ACCESS-BOARD.GOV/GUIDELINES-AND-STANDARDS/S |
| | TREETS-SIDEWALKS/PUBLIC-RIGHTS-OF-WAY/BACKGROUND/ACCESS |
| | -ADVISORY-COMMITTEE-FINAL-REPORT/X02-6-VEHICULAR-WAYS-A |
| | ND-FACILITIES |
| | |
| | -LABEL WIDTH AND LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. |
| | - PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN FOR REVIEW. SHOW ALL |
| | OF BUNKER ROAD. SHOW LANE WIDTHS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, |
| | AND DISTANCE OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES FROM A FIXED |
| | POINT, E.G. POINT OF TANGENCY OF CURB RETURN. |
| | - LABEL SIDEWALK WIDTH |
| | - SHEET C-01, PROVIDE DRIVEWAY PROFILE. NOTE THAT CITY |
| | DETAIL CWPB NO-GC-7 ISN?T ADA COMPLIANT FOR NARROW |
| | SIDEWALKS. |
| | - WHY ARE TWO DRIVEWAYS PROPOSED ON WEBSTER? |
| | - WHY IS THERE A LARGE DROP CURB PROPOSED AT THE SOUTH |
| | ENTRANCE OF WEBSTER? ONLY TWO DOORS ARE SHOWN ON |
| | BUILDING. |
| | - WILL LOADING ON WEBSTER BLOCK SIDEWALK? |
| | - BUNKER ROAD, REVIEW ADA ACCESSIBILITY OF SIDEWALK. IT |
| | APPEARS THE EXISTING CURB RAMP AT THE EAST END OF THE |
| | PROPERTY IS NOT ADA COMPLIANT. |
| | |
| | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. |
| | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
