| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-12 11:05:19 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 08.12.2015 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z15070030 |
| | CASE NO.: WCF 15-05 |
| | ADDRESS: 3410 ELECTRONICS WAY |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: GERALD A. MULDOWNEY |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 352.215.9100 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ? |
| | NON-CONCEALED. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-332 OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THERE IS A RANKING |
| | PREFERENCE REGARDING LOCATION AND TYPE OF WIRELESS |
| | FACILITIES. THE PROPOSED NON-CONCEALED FREESTANDING |
| | TOWER ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IS IDENTIFIED AS THE LOWEST |
| | RANKED ALTERNATIVE. WHERE A LOWER RANKED ALTERNATIVE IS |
| | PROPOSED, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION AND |
| | DEMONSTRATE WHY THE HIGHER RANKED OPTIONS, INCLUDING A |
| | CONCEALED FREESTANDING TOWER, ARE NOT TECHNICALLY |
| | FEASIBLE, PRACTICAL, OR JUSTIFIED. |
| | |
| | A. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT A CONCEALED |
| | FREESTANDING TOWER WOULD BE PROCESSED AS A LEVEL III |
| | APPLICATION, AS OPPOSED TO THE CURRENT LEVEL IV |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-337(G) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS, |
| | ANTENNA MOUNTS SHALL BE FLUSH-MOUNTED UNLESS IT IS |
| | DEMONSTRATED THAT SUCH ANTENNAS WILL NOT MEET THE |
| | NETWORK OBJECTIVES. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT PRIOR TO ANY PUBLIC HEARING, A |
| | BALLOON TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 94-337(H) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | ADVERTISING REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH TEST, AND ENSURE THAT |
| | CITY STAFF AND CITYSCAPE CONSULTANTS, INC. ARE NOTIFIED |
| | WELL IN ADVANCE OF SUCH TEST. |
| | |
| | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-337(J) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS, |
| | THE EQUIPMENT COMPOUND SHALL BE ENCLOSED WITH AN OPAQUE |
| | FENCE. WHILE THE FENCE DETAIL ON SHEET C3.20 INDICATES |
| | A CEDAR SLAT FENCE ON A STEEL FRAME, SHEET C2.00 |
| | REFERENCES AN ?OPAQUE CHAINLINK FENCE WITH SECURITY?, |
| | AND SHEET E1.00 INDICATES A PROPOSED ?CHAINLINK FENCE |
| | W/ OVERHEAD SECURITY?. ADDITIONALLY, THE NOTE ON SHEET |
| | C2.00 APPEARS TO POINT TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND NOT THE |
| | FENCING SURROUNDING THE EQUIPMENT COMPOUND. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY ALL ASPECTS. |
| | |
| | 5. NOTE THAT THE AREA SHOWN ON SHEET C2.10 TO BE SAWCUT |
| | AND REMOVED NEEDS TO BE SUFFICIENT ENOUGH TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. THE PLANS WILL |
| | NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-337(R) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS, |
| | ONE PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT |
| | AREA. THE SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE LEASED |
| | AREA, OR EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, OR DEVELOPMENT AREA. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY AS TO THE LOCATION WHERE MAINTENANCE |
| | VEHICLES WILL BE PERMITTED TO PARK ON THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 7. TO REDUCE THE VISUAL IMPACT, AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE |
| | PROPOSED GALVANIZED EXTERIOR FINISH SHALL BE |
| | CONSIDERED. |
| | |
| | 8. PLANS INDICATE THAT LANDSCAPING WILL BE INSTALLED IN |
| | VARIOUS EASEMENTS. IF THE EASEMENTS BELONG TO ANYONE |
| | OTHER THAN THE APPLICANT, PLEASE PROVIDE CONSENT FROM |
| | EACH EASEMENT HOLDER INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE NO |
| | OBJECTION TO THE IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9. IN ADDITION TO THE COMMENTS PRESENTED ABOVE BY CITY |
| | STAFF, PLEASE NOTE ALL COMMENTS ISSUED BY CITYSCAPE |
| | CONSULTANTS, INC., AS OUTLINED IN THEIR SITE REVIEW |
| | REPORT DATED AUGUST 11, 2015. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SEPTEMBER 16, |
| | 2015, PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MARCH 15, 2013. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE SEPTEMBER 16, 2015, PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO |
| | LATER THAN MARCH 31, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. A SIGNED AND |
| | NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE |
| | REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
