| Date |
Text |
| 2015-09-09 12:58:47 | MAJOR AMEND |
| | |
| | CASE NO. PB1045 |
| | GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER MAJOR PD AMENDMENT |
| | 1309 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | SEPTEMBER 18, 2015, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR SCHEDULING FOR |
| | THE OCTOBER 20, 2015 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 2, 2015), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE ENTIRE |
| | GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER, INCLUDING THE NORTH |
| | PARKING LOT THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE |
| | MAP AMENDMENT AND THE REZONING AND THE PROPERTIES WEST |
| | OF DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE INCLUDED ON |
| | A SURVEY. THE FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | THIS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN .WORD FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SIGN PROGRAM CANNOT MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SIGN |
| | SHOWN ON THE CORNER OF FLAGLER DRIVE AND PALM BEACH |
| | LAKES BOULEVARD UNLESS THE CORNER PARCEL REVERTS BACK |
| | TO THE GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER. |
| | |
| | 3) GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER SHALL APPLY TO ABANDON |
| | THE 75 FOOT BY 13.5 FOOT ALLEY THAT EXTENDS FROM SOUTH |
| | DIXIE HIGHWAY. IF THE CITY COMMISSION DOES NOT ABANDON |
| | THE ALLEY, THEN THE GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER SHALL |
| | SECURE A REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR THE USE OF THE LAND OR |
| | DESIGN THE SITE TO EXCLUDE THE ALLEY. THIS REQUIRES THE |
| | RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES AS WELL AS |
| | THE ADDITION OF BUFFER LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 4) THE AWNING IS OVER THE DRIVEWAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF |
| | THE DRIVE AISLE. IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE A WALKWAY IN |
| | THE DRIVE AISLE? IF SO IT NEEDS TO BE DELINEATED. |
| | |
| | 5) ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE CONFIRMED TO MEET |
| | MINIMUM CODE SIZE REQUIREMENTS OR THEY SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNATED AS COMPACT SPACES (IF THEY MEET THE COMPACT |
| | SPACE MINIMUMS). IF A ROW CAN BE RESTRIPED TO HAVE ALL |
| | SPACES MEET CODE, THAT IS THE OPTION THAT SHALL BE |
| | USED. ? BASED ON THE NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE |
| | APPLICANT, STAFF IS RESEARCHING THIS TO DETERMINE IF |
| | WAIVERS CAN BE REQUESTED FOR THE SUBSTANDARD SPACES AND |
| | DRIVE AISLES. |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING HOSPITAL |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 7) THE MASTER PLAN SUBMITTED ON AUGUST 21 CONTAINS |
| | PARCELS ON THE WEST SIDE OF DIXIE THAT ARE NO LONGER IN |
| | THE CSPD. |
| | |
| | SIGN COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 8) PROVIDE THE SIGN SETBACK DIMENSIONS TO THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND THE PROPERTY LINES. NO VERIFICATION |
| | WAS PROVIDED THAT THE EXISTING SIGNS MEET THESE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: SIGNS 4, 26 AND 27 ARE SHOWN IN |
| | INCORRECT LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | MASTER SIGN PLAN |
| | |
| | 10) NEED STATEMENT THAT WHEN REPLACED ALL SIGNS SHALL |
| | BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASTER SIGN PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11) ESTABLISH WHAT THE MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION |
| | PARAMETERS ARE. |
| | |
| | 12) REMOVE WORD ?SUM? FROM PER FACE SQ. FT. |
| | |
| | 13) BOTTOM OF THE SIGN ON THE SIGN TYPE DRAWINGS IS |
| | WIDER THAN THE PERMITTED WIDTH DIMENSION. |
| | |
| | TYPE A ? WALL MOUNTED: |
| | |
| | 14) REWRITE TO STATE ?MAY? INCLUDE DESCRIPTION OF |
| | SERVICE. |
| | |
| | 15) NO SIGNS EXTEND PAST BUILDING WALL. ARE THEY ASKING |
| | FOR WAIVER? STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT. |
| | |
| | TYPE C - TENANT SIGN: |
| | |
| | 16) SIGN 18 SHOULD NOT BE IN THIS TYPE. A TEN FOOT TALL |
| | SIGN AT THIS INTERNAL LOCATION IS OUT OF SCALE WITH THE |
| | INTERIOR CAMPUS SIGNS. THE 10 FOOT TALL SIGNS ARE ALL |
| | AT THE PERIMETER OF THE CAMPUS. THIS ALSO BLOCKS THE |
| | FRONT OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 17) STAFF NEEDS CLARITY ON HOW THE 70 FOOT SHIFT WILL |
| | WORK FOR SIGN 18. |
| | |
| | 18) THE DIMENSION OF 6 FEET BY 10 FEET IS ONLY 60 SQ. |
| | FT. NOT 65 SQ. FT. AS LISTED IN THE TEXT. |
| | |
| | TYPE D ? LARGE DIRECTIONAL: |
| | |
| | 19) WHY DOES SIGN 17 NEED 3 SIDES? IT IS ONLY |
| | APPROACHED FROM THE SOUTH AND NORTH. EAST BOUND TRAFFIC |
| | TURNS AT SIGN 16. |
| | |
| | TYPE E ? MEDIUM DIRECTIONAL: |
| | |
| | 20) INCLUDE A TENANT/MEDIUM DIRECTIONAL SIGN DRAWINGS |
| | AS PART OF TYPE C |
| | |
| | 21) THE DIMENSION OF 6.5 FEET BY 4.75 FEET IS ONLY |
| | 29.25 SQ. FT. NOT 30 SQ. FT. AS LISTED IN THE TEXT. |
| | |
| | TYPE F ? SMALL DIRECTIONAL: |
| | |
| | 22) THIS SIGN TYPE REQUIRES FURTHER DISCUSSION. STAFF |
| | HAS CONCERNS WITH THE SIZE PROPOSED (INCREASE OVER THE |
| | EXISTING SIZE AND/OR HEIGHT FOR SIGNS 2, 14 AND 28). |
| | |
| | 23) STAFF DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE LANDSCAPE NOTE ON THE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 24) SIGN 21 IS NOT A SMALL DIRECTIONAL. THIS SIGN NEEDS |
| | TO BE REPLACED AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT IN CONFORMITY |
| | WITH A TYPE E. THE REVISED MASTER SIGN PLAN DOES NOT |
| | SHOW A DIRECTIONAL SIGN AT THIS LOCATION. |
| | HOW/WHERE/WHEN IS THIS SIGN BEING REPLACED? |
| | |
| | 25) WHAT IS THE ?BY RIGHT? SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SIGNS |
| | ON THE SITE BASED ON THE STREET FRONTAGES? THIS WAS NOT |
| | CORRECTLY PROVIDED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL STREET FRONTAGE. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, STAFF ARRIVES AT A DIFFERENT VALUE FOR |
| | THE TOTAL FRONTAGE FROM THAT CALCULATED BY THE |
| | APPLICANT. STAFF CALCULATES THAT ONLY THE SOUTH |
| | FRONTAGE DOES NOT EXCEED THE PERMITTED SIGNAGE. |
| | |
| | 26) THERE ARE NUMEROUS TYPOS AND INCORRECT CALCULATIONS |
| | ON THE MASTER SIGN PLAN AND IN THE PLAN TEXT. |
| | |
| | 27) REPEAT COMMENT: NEED DIMENSIONS FOR EXISTING SIGNS |
| | WITH THE SIGN PHOTO TO DETERMINE HOW THEY RELATE TO THE |
| | PROPOSED SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 28) REPEAT COMMENT: SIGN PLAN NEEDS TO COVER SIGNS FOR |
| | GARAGE ENTRY AND RESERVED PARKING. EX. AS NEEDED, NO |
| | LOGO, SIX FEET TALL, ETC. |
| | |
| | 29) REPEAT COMMENT: APPEAR TO BE TEMPORARY SIGNS ON THE |
| | SITE (VALET). VALET SIGNAGE NEEDS TO BE INCORPORATED. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
