| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-08 17:13:42 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 15-03 |
| | 12/18/15 RESUBMITTAL #2 |
| | GENERAL LAND ACRES |
| | 4600 BLOCK (EAST SIDE) GEORGIA AVENUE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY MARCH 8, 2016), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($400). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | SHOW DIFFERENT CONDITIONS (EX. BELOW). ALL PLANS SHALL |
| | SHOW SAME CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | A. THE DRIVEWAYS/ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN IN DIFFERENT |
| | CONFIGURATIONS ON SITE/LANDSCAPE VS. CIVIL PLANS. THE |
| | CURBED, ISLAND RADII ARE NOT DEPICTED ON THE |
| | SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS THE ADA |
| | SIGN IN THE NEIGHBORING PARKING SPACE (HEAD TO HEAD |
| | PARKING). THE ADA STRIPING LOCATIONS (2 INCHES APART) |
| | DO NOT MATCH THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL, WHICH REQUIRES |
| | THE SAME SIX (6) INCH SPACING AS THE REGULAR PARKING |
| | SPACES HAVE. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSION SHALL BE |
| | INCLUDED ON THE SITE AND/OR CIVIL PLANS. NOTE: WHILE |
| | THE DETAIL SHOWS THEM AS FOUR (4) FEET WIDE, SCALING |
| | THE PLANS SHOWS LESS THAN FOUR (4) FEET. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE SHALL BE |
| | CORRECTED AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | A. THERE ARE TWO BICYCLE RACKS SO THERE ARE FOUR (4) |
| | PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5) RECOMMENDATION: VERIFY ALL THE DIMENSION TAGS |
| | BETWEEN THE SITE AND CIVIL PLANS. SOME APPEAR TO USE |
| | DIFFERING MEASURE POINTS (EX. THE 43 FOOT EAST/WEST |
| | DIMENSION) AND SOME SCALE CORRECTLY AND OTHER DO NOT. |
| | STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THIS COULD LEAD TO DELAYS AT |
| | THE TIME OF PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | 6) RECOMMENDATION: THE CITY REQUIRES A 12 FOOT 6 INCH |
| | WIDE OPENING FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. WHILE THIS IS |
| | SHOWN ON THE STANDARD CITY DETAIL PROVIDED, THERE IS NO |
| | DIMENSION TAG ON THE PLANS FOR THE OPENING AND IT |
| | SCALES AT LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 12 FEET 6 INCHES. |
| | STAFF RECOMMENDS VERIFYING THIS OPENING TO FORGO |
| | PROBLEMS AT TIME OF PERMITTING. |
| | |
| |
Print |
