| Date |
Text |
| 2015-06-30 14:49:35 | ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 06.30.2015 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z15060014 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1635G |
| | ADDRESS: 1112 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: CHRIS BARRY |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: MODIFICATIONS TO PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED |
| | MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. ELEVATION POINTS AT EACH OF THE DIFFERENT AREAS. IT |
| | IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE VARIOUS LEVELS ARE AND HOW THE |
| | TRANSITIONS OCCUR. |
| | |
| | 2. CROSS SECTIONS AND/OR DETAILS OF ALL WALLS, FENCES, |
| | RETAINING WALLS, VEHICULAR GATES, ETC. BE SURE TO |
| | INCLUDE GRADE LEVELS AND THE HEIGHTS OF THE ELEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3. DETAILS ON THE WATER FEATURE. IT IS UNCLEAR ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN IF THIS IS AT-GRADE, ELEVATED, ETC. |
| | |
| | 4. PUBLIC WALKWAY LABEL NORTH OF THE BUILDING IS |
| | POINTING TO THE WRONG LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 5. WHAT IS THE BASIS OF THE GEOMETRIC CONFIGURATION OF |
| | THE PUBLIC WALKWAY? THIS DOESN?T SEEM CONDUCIVE TO HOW |
| | PEOPLE WOULD COMFORTABLY USE THIS SPACE. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY |
| | ADJACENT TO THE SEAWALL HAS BEEN REDUCED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. NOTE CONDITION #12 OF RESOLUTION NO. 140-14. |
| | |
| | 6. THE FOUR (4) AREAS LABELED AS ?LANDSCAPE WALL? AND |
| | SUBJECT TO CONDITION #3I OF RESOLUTION NO. 140-14 |
| | APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PLANS. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 7. THE AREA LABELED AS ?PUBLIC PATIO? IN THE NORTHEAST |
| | CORNER OF THE SITE ON THE PROPOSED PLANS APPEARS TO NOW |
| | SHOW A BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE DETAILS AS |
| | TO WHAT IS PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 8. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOULD INDICATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | EXISTING/PROPOSED UTILITY LINES. |
| | |
| | 9. IS THERE ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ON THE POOL DECK |
| | LEVEL SOUTH OF THE TOWER? IF SO, PLEASE BE SURE TO |
| | INCLUDE IT IN THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 10. PLEASE NOTE CONDITION #3H OF RESOLUTION NO. 140-14 |
| | REGARDING TINTING OF THE GLASS. |
| | |
| | 11. THERE IS A SIGN DETAIL ON SHEET SP-2, BUT NO SIGN |
| | IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 12. BASED UPON THE LAYOUT OF THE PARKING AND RAMP |
| | LOCATION, A TURN-AROUND AREA WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED |
| | ON THE LOWER LEVEL AT THE DEAD-END IN THE NORTHWEST |
| | CORNER OF THE GARAGE. AN ADDITIONAL TURN-AROUND WILL |
| | NEED TO BE PROVIDED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE |
| | UPPER LEVEL OF PARKING. |
| | |
| | 13. PLEASE CLARIFY THOSE AREAS BETWEEN THE 2 ELEVATOR |
| | CORES ON THE PARKING LEVELS. THEY APPEAR TO BE STRIPED |
| | AS PARKING SPACES, BUT THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE USED |
| | AS SUCH AS THEY ARE BLOCKED BY OTHER PARKING. |
| | |
| | 14. THERE ARE A FEW AREAS WHERE INSUFFICIENT BACK-OUT |
| | SPACE HAS BEEN PROVIDED BEHIND PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION THAT THE ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES ALONG THE EASTERN WALL OF THE UPPER AND |
| | LOWER PARKING LEVEL MEET THE ACCESSIBILITY |
| | REQUIREMENTS. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ACCESS |
| | AISLE CANNOT GO BEHIND A PARKING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 16. NO FLOOR PLANS WERE PROVIDED FOR FLOORS 15-21. |
| | |
| | 17. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE CROSS-SECTION ON SHEET A-8 |
| | HAS 312 FEET TO THE TALLEST PART OF THE BUILDING, WHILE |
| | THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A-9 HAVE 327 FEET. NONE OF THE |
| | HEIGHTS MATCH WHEN COMPARING THE ELEVATIONS TO THE |
| | CROSS-SECTION. ADDITIONALLY, THE CROSS-SECTION USED FOR |
| | THE AREA ANALYSIS DOES NOT MATCH. |
| | |
| | 18. THE PARKING COUNTS SHOWN IN THE AREA ANALYSIS DO |
| | NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PARKING LEVEL |
| | PLANS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
