| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-17 16:41:07 | - PLEASE VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE |
| | REQUIRED. BASED ON LOT SIZE OF 71,599SF, PRIVATE OPEN |
| | SPACE IS 17,899SF |
| | - PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SHALL BE RAISED TO THE |
| | SIDEWALK LEVEL. PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE SIDEWALK.IN A SIMILAR WAY, ALLEY CURB CUT SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS. |
| | - RETAIL USES REQUIRED ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL HAVE |
| | A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 25 FEET. |
| | - PLEASE PROVID INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FACADE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR NON-ACTIVE USES. |
| | - PORTION OF PARKING GARAGE IS ENCROACHING INTO |
| | CONDITIONAL SETBACK. |
| | - ROSEMARY STREET DESIGN SHALL BE MAINTAIN AS IT IS. |
| | - EVERNIA STREET SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS ANGLE PARKING. |
| | STREET SHALL BE RESTRIPED AS 30 DEGREE PARKING AND 11 |
| | FOOT TRAVEL LANES. |
| | - EXISTING STREET LIGHTS ON EVERNIA SHALL BE REPLACED |
| | BY CITY STANDARD DECORATIVE LIGHTING. |
| | - TREE GRATES ALONG EVERNIA STREET SHALL BE CITY |
| | STANDARD. |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | BLANK WALL REGULATIONS (SKETCH OR TABLE ON HOW IT WAS |
| | CALCULATED). |
| | - CURB CUT FOR PARKIGN GARAGE ENTRACE EXCEED MAXIMUM |
| | ALLOWED. A DAC VARIANCE WILL BE NEEDED. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: |
| | - PLEASE INDICATE PL, AND SETBACK LINE IN ALL DRAWINGS. |
| | SHEET A1.02 IS MISSING THE INFORMATION. ALSO INCLUDE |
| | THE LOCATION OF EXISTING CURB LINE. |
| | - SHEET L-413.1 SHOWS A SECTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD |
| | THAT DOES NOT SEEM ACCURATE. PLEASE INDICATE IN SITE |
| | PLAN THE LOCATION OF THE SECTION. |
| | - PLEASE VERIFY THE DIMENSION OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK |
| | AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE. IT SEEMS THE |
| | EXISTING SIDEWALK ALL UNDER ROW IS 13' IN WIDTH. |
| | - SETBACK IS MEASURED FORM BACK OF EXISTING CURB. |
| | SECTION ON SHEET L-413.2 NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. |
| | - SHEET L-420 SHOWS COLUMNS ENCROACHING INTO THE SETBCK |
| | ON EVERNIA STREET. |
| | - LANDSCAPE AND FLOOR PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. |
| | LANDSCAPE SHOWS PLANTING BLOCKING THE LOBBY ACCESS FOR |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER ON ROSEMARY AVE. |
| | - SURVEY NEEDS TO INCORPORATE THE ROSEMARY ST |
| | STREETSCAPE. IT SHALL ALSO BE INDICATED ON THE FIRST |
| | FLOOR PLAN. |
| |
Print |
