| Date |
Text |
| 2015-06-10 08:21:50 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC |
| | DIVISION, APPROVING TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | APPLICATION WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING |
| | UNTIL A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM THE COUNTY IS |
| | RECEIVED. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE NOTE THAT A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. THE RE-PLAT WILL BE REVIEWED AS A SEPARATE |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS A DEVELOPMENT OF |
| | SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (DSI). PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN |
| | RESPONSES TO SECTION 94-36(E)(3), SECTION 94-36(E)(4) |
| | AND SECTION 94-36(E)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. [REFERENCE P.9, 27-28 OF THE |
| | 2015 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION] |
| | |
| | 4.) RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS FOR THE ACCESS POINTS ALONG |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND SKEES ROAD WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FROM FDOT AND PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 5.) THERE SEEMS TO BE A PROPOSED ACCESS POINT INTO THE |
| | COMMERCIAL PARCEL. A CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS INTO THE ADJACENT |
| | COMMERCIAL PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 6.) INCONSISTENCIES HAVE BEEN DETECTED BETWEEN THE SITE |
| | PLAN, PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN (I.E. |
| | LOCATION OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, PLACEMENT OF LIGHT |
| | FIXTURES, ETC.). ALL PLANS SHOULD MATCH. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS OF THE DECLARATION OF |
| | RESTRICTIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS, A |
| | MINIMUM 6 FT. HIGH WALL SHALL BE PLACED ON TOP OF A |
| | CONTINUOUS 2 FT. HIGH LANDSCAPED BERM ALONG THE ENTIRE |
| | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS ONLY A 5 FT. |
| | TALL WALL WITH NO INDICATION AND/OR DETAIL OF THE |
| | REQUIRED 2 FT. TALL BERM. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 2.) PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS, A 15 |
| | FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE SOUTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE SHOW AND PROVIDE A NOTE IN THE |
| | PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE THAT THIS CONDITION WILL BE MET. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED PERIMETER WALL. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF |
| | RESTRICTIONS, THE WALL ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE |
| | SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OUT OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, |
| | OR OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE ADJUST THE SCALE OF THE PLANS TO A |
| | MEASURABLE ENGINEER'S SCALE. |
| | |
| | 2.) ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR: |
| | GENERAL COMMERCIAL IS "GC" (NOT "CG"); THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR IS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE PROVIDE MAXIMUM/MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR AND/OR |
| | DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS. |
| | |
| | 3.) CLARIFY IF A DUMPSTER OR TRASH COMPACTOR WILL BE |
| | UTILIZED? THE PLANS AND DETAIL SEEM TO REFERENCE BOTH |
| | AT THE SAME LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 4.) RELOCATE THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER/TRASH COMPACTOR. THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER/TRASH COMPACTOR DOES |
| | NOT SEEM APPROPRIATE FOR SANITATION TRUCKS TO MANEUVER |
| | EASILY FOR TRASH PICK-UP. |
| | |
| | 5.) HOW WIDE IS THE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SKEES |
| | ROAD? SHOW DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 6.) PROVIDE A SIDEWALK ALONG SKEES ROAD. [CODE OF |
| | ORDINANCES S.78-8] |
| | |
| | 7.) EACH ROW OF PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OF NOT LESS THAN 5 FT. IN WIDTH AND |
| | NOT LESS THAN THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT STALL. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-443(C)(3)(A.)] |
| | |
| | 8.) THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A BYPASS LANE AT EACH OF |
| | THE THREE GATED ENTRANCES INTO THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION TO HOW |
| | RESIDENTS/GUESTS WILL BE GRANTED ACCESS INTO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT. ARE THE GATES MECHANICAL? WILL THERE BE A |
| | CALL BOX? WHAT IS THE VEHICULAR QUEUING DISTANCE? |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE IF |
| | ADEQUATE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION/BACK UP DISTANCE WILL BE |
| | AVAILABLE SHOULD THE GATES FAIL TO WORK. |
| | |
| | 9.) PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/DETAILS ON THE 5 FT. |
| | TALL FENCE ALONG THE NORTH, EAST AND WEST SIDE OF THE |
| | PROPERTY (I.E. WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL, ETC.). PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C), TABLE XIV-1, A |
| | MINIMUM 5 FT. HIGH WALL SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO |
| | THE COMMERCIAL PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 10.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-304(D) OF THE ZLDR, A |
| | SWIMMING POOL BARRIER IS REQUIRED AROUND THE POOL AREA |
| | FOR SAFETY. |
| | |
| | 11.) THERE SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF TEXT, PERFORATED LINE |
| | OVERLAP IN THE SITE PLAN WHICH MAKES THE PLAN DIFFICULT |
| | TO READ. PLEASE REMOVE ANY REDUNDANT TEXT/LINES IN THE |
| | PLAN FOR CLARITY. |
| | |
| | 12.) WILL THERE BE ANY SIGNAGE TO IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN OR |
| | ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM |
| | VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT. A CONFLICT IS DETECTED WITH THE |
| | 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG IN THE ROW OF PARKING SPACES AND A |
| | PROPOSED CONTINUOUS HEDGE ALONG THE WESTERN PERIMETER |
| | OF THE PARCEL. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-442(B)(4)] |
| | |
| | 2.) A MINIMUM 10 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG SKEES |
| | ROAD SHALL BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(D)(1) |
| | OF THE ZLDR. PLEASE NOTE IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, SIGNED AND |
| | STAMPED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | |
| | FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE INFORMATION AND DIMENSIONS |
| | FOR THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF DWELLING UNITS. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND A FLOOR PLAN, WITH |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED RECREATION BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | MAINTENANCE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED MAIL KIOSK. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ALL ROOFED ACCESSORY |
| | STRUCTURES ON A PROPERTY SHALL NOT EXCEED 75% OF THE |
| | GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE WITH A |
| | MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,000 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-304(B)] |
| | |
| | 6.) PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF |
| | FOR EACH BUILDING TYPE. |
| | |
| | 7.) PROVIDE REAR ELEVATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED 10 AND 11 |
| | UNIT GARAGES. |
| | |
| | |
| | SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) CONSIDER RELOCATING THE MAINTENANCE BUILDING AWAY |
| | FROM THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD STREET FRONTAGE. THE |
| | PROPOSED LOCATION DOES NOT SEEM TO BE THE BEST SUITED |
| | LOCATION FOR A MAINTENANCE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2.) CONSIDER ALIGNING THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS WITH THE |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN ORDER TO CREATE A BUFFER BETWEEN |
| | THE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN USE AREAS. INCREASING THE |
| | WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS TO ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | WALKWAYS WILL ALSO IMPROVE THE LANDSCAPING AND OVERALL |
| | DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 3.) ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON THE REAR |
| | FACADES OF THE 10 AND 11 CAR GARAGES ARE HIGHLY |
| | DESIRABLE ALONG THE SKEES ROAD STREET FRONTAGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8 1/2 BY |
| | 11), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL |
| | PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% ($600) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CALL LINDA LOUIE, PLANNER, @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE |
| | ARE QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |
