| Date |
Text |
| 2015-05-28 15:07:33 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) NOTARIZED WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, |
| | 1200X, LLC, DESIGNATING SILBERSTEIN ARCHITECTURE, TO |
| | HANDLE ALL MATTERS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPLICATION |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED. [5/13 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) CONCURRENCY LETTERS REQUIRED FROM THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION (561-684-4030) AND THE SCHOOL |
| | DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY (CONCURRENCY APPLICATION |
| | ON P. 22 OF THE 2015 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). [5/13 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. [NOT ADDRESSED PER 5/13 PPRC |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE STANDARDS IN |
| | SECTION 94-35(C) - SITE DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE |
| | DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (P. 32 AND 33 OF THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION). [5/13 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PURSUANT TO S.94-309(G.)(6)(B.) OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING |
| | HEIGHT MEASURED FROM THE GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE |
| | BUILDING SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FT. [5/13 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS TO INCLUDE (BUT NOT |
| | LIMITED TO) THE FOLLOWING: SETBACKS, DRIVEWAYS, ETC. |
| | [5/13 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 3.) CORRECT THE ZONING DISTRICT TO MF14-C1 |
| | (?MULTI-FAMILY LOW DENSITY, URBAN HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL |
| | DISTRICT, CONTEXT 1?). [5/13 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO |
| | DETERMINE IF THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT. THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACE SEEMS INAPPROPRIATE AND IT MAY |
| | NOT BE NECESSARY WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 5.) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE 1.5 FT. TALL PROPOSED FUTURE |
| | ART/BENCH. |
| | |
| | 6.) REMOVE ANY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS FROM THE 8 FT. WIDE |
| | UTILITY EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | 7.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLES. |
| | |
| | |
| | ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) INCONSISTENCIES HAVE BEEN DETECTED IN THE SITE PLAN |
| | AND ELEVATIONS (I.E. FENCE AND GATE DETAIL). PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | COMMON AREA TRACT: |
| | |
| | 1.) AT THE 5/13 PPRC MEETING, THE APPLICANT INDICATED |
| | THAT A COMMON AREA TRACT WILL BE CREATED FOR THE ACCESS |
| | DRIVE AND GUEST PARKING SPACES; HOWEVER, THE ACCESS |
| | DRIVE AND GUEST PARKING SPACES ARE STILL REFLECTED ON |
| | INDIVIDUAL LOTS. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) RELOCATE THE UTILITY LINES UNDERGROUND. (AS NOTED |
| | IN THE APPLICANT?S RESPONSE LETTER TO THE PPRC |
| | COMMENTS, DATED 5/19/15, RELOCATING THE LINES |
| | UNDERGROUND WOULD NOT BE FEASIBLE. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY.) |
| | |
| | 2.) REMOVE THE 1.5 FT. TALL PROPOSED FUTURE ART - THIS |
| | SEEMS UNCESSARY AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION. |
| | |
| | NOTES: |
| | |
| | 1.) A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 81/2 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT |
| | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
