| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-22 18:18:40 | PB 1600E |
| | PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY MINOR PD AMENDMENT - 1ST |
| | RESUBMITTAL 12/10/15 |
| | 1901 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY APRIL 22, 2016), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) FENCES AND GATES |
| | |
| | A. REVISED COMMENT: THE FENCE EXHIBIT PLAN SHOWS GATES |
| | THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH RESOLUTION NO. 376-10. WHAT IS |
| | SHOWN AS GATE NO. 3 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE TEMPORARY |
| | STREET CLOSURE, AND IT BLOCKS PEDESTRIANS AND |
| | BICYCLISTS FROM ACCESSING THE LIMITED STREET CLOSURE |
| | AREA ROADWAYS WHEN THEY ARE CLOSED TO VEHICULAR |
| | TRAFFIC. GATES WITHIN THE ROW NOT APPROVED BY |
| | RESOLUTION NO. 376-10 SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS |
| | PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | B. REVISED COMMENT - CONDITION: THE RETAINING WALL WITH |
| | ADDITIONAL FENCING PROPOSED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF |
| | THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX EXCEEDS THE ALLOWANCE OF SECTION |
| | 94-302(C), WHICH ONLY PERMITS WALLS AND FENCES TO BE 48 |
| | INCHES HIGH WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. THE HEIGHT IS |
| | MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL, WHICH IN THIS |
| | EXCEEDS THE 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE RESPONSE COMMENTS |
| | STATE THAT THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, WHICH IS |
| | INCORRECT. STAFF HAD REQUESTED INFORMATION ON THIS |
| | DURING THE REVIEW OF THE FORMAL SITE PLAN IN 2011 BUT |
| | WAS NEVER PROVIDED THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED |
| | WITH THIS CURRENT APPLICATION. STAFF WILL CONDITION |
| | THIS APPROVAL THAT PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT |
| | FOR THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX, EITHER THE WALL IS |
| | CONSTRUCTED AT THE CODE PERMITTED 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT |
| | WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK, THE WALL IS MOVED OUT OF THE |
| | SETBACK, OR A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT IS |
| | APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION THAT GRANTS A WAIVER TO |
| | PERMIT A WALL EXCEEDING 48 INCHES WITHIN THE FRONT |
| | SETBACK. |
| | |
| | C. CONDITION: STAFF WILL APPROVE THE GENERAL LOCATION |
| | AND DESIGN OF THE WALLS, FENCES AND GATES AS PART OF |
| | THIS AMENDMENT. THE FINAL HEIGHT, DESIGN AND LOCATION |
| | WILL BE APPROVED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATIONS FOR THE WALLS, GATES AND FENCES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS APPROVED AT THE TIME OF |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA CHART SHALL REFERENCE |
| | RESOLUTION NO. 144-11, NOT ORDINANCE NO. 4303-10, AS IT |
| | IS THE LATEST LEGISLATION FOR THE SITE. THE REQUIRED |
| | SETBACKS FOR THE RELOCATED (OUT) BUILDING SHALL REFLECT |
| | THE APPROVED "REQUIRED" SETBACKS OF FRONT - FIVE FEET |
| | AND CORNER SIDE - 17 FEET. PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTED |
| | PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: CORRECT THE DESIGNATION AND |
| | DIMENSION OF THE SETBACKS ON THE SITE DATA TABLE, |
| | INCLUDING THE PITT BUILDING AND THE OTHER FINAL SCHOOL |
| | BUILDINGS. LISTED SETBACKS CONFLICT WITH THE DIMENSIONS |
| | PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY. PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR |
| | TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE 10 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES, |
| | NOT FIVE, PROVIDED AS STATED ON THE SITE DATA TABLE. |
| | PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 5) NEW COMMENT: THE RELOCATED BUS PARKING HAS REMOVED |
| | TWO OF THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM THE SITE (61 |
| | REQUIRED). PLANS SHOWING 61 PARKING PACED SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 6) REPEAT COMMENT - CONDITION: AN UPDATED LIGHTING PLAN |
| | IS REQUIRED WHICH CONFORMS TO THE NEW PEDESTRIAN PATH |
| | CONFIGURATION. PLEASE REMEMBER THE LIGHTING LEVELS MAY |
| | NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING |
| | BOUNDARIES (INCLUDING THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING). NO |
| | LIGHTING PLAN WAS SUBMITTED. CONFORMING PLANS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDE PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 7) REVISED COMMENT - CONDITION: THE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | SHOWN ON THE BUILDING, THE SITE WALL AND THE NEW |
| | MONUMENT SIGN COMPLY WITH SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | ITEMS THAT WILL NEED CLARIFICATION/CORRECTION AT TIME |
| | OF PERMITTING ARE THAT EXACT LOCATION OF THE SIGN ON |
| | THE SITE WALL. IT IS UNCLEAR IF IT IS MOUNTED TO THE |
| | PORTION OF THE WALL THAT IS SETBACK 25 FEET FROM |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE. FINAL SIGNAGE APPROVAL WILL OCCUR DURING |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SIGN |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS AS "EXISTING SIGN TO BE MODIFIED" DOES |
| | NOT EXIST AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS. PLANS |
| | SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CIVIL PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE |
| | MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAT |
| | AND SITE PLAN FOR THE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT - THE PAVERED |
| | PEDESTRIAN PATH IS NOT WITHIN THE EASEMENT AT THE |
| | SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. WHY DOES THIS |
| | DISCREPANCY CONTINUE TO OCCUR? ALL PLANS SHALL AGREE ON |
| | THE PATH AND THUS THE EASEMENT. IF THE PLAT AND SITE |
| | PLAN ARE CORRECT, THEN THE CIVIL PLAN WILL NEED TO BE |
| | CORRECTED AS PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF WILL NOT PERMIT THE PAVERED |
| | WALKWAY TO CROSS THE MANHOLE COVER AS SHOWN ON THE |
| | CIVIL PLAN. |
| | |
| | 9) CONDITION: PLEASE BE AWARE THAT PLANNING STAFF IS |
| | ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPE THAT HAS BEEN SHOWN WITHIN THE |
| | DRAINAGE EASEMENT. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | PROTECT ANY UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE. IF THE |
| | VEGETATION CAUSES THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO NOT |
| | FUNCTION PROPERLY OR DOES NOT SURVIVE IN THE PLANTED |
| | AREAS, THEN THE LANDSCAPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED. |
| | |
| | 10) CONDITION: ALL PERIMETER BUFFERS, PARKING LOT |
| | LANDSCAPE AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS NEED TO BE INSTALLED |
| | AS PART OF THE INTERIM PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
