| Date |
Text |
| 2015-04-28 15:42:10 | APRIL 27, 2015 |
| | |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES NEAR THE |
| | BANYAN TREE APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING TREE |
| | CANOPY. HOW WILL CONFLICTS WITH THE TREE BE RESOLVED? |
| | IF THE BANYAN IS CONSIDERED A HISTORIC TREE THROUGH |
| | THIS PETITION IT MUST BE PROTECTED FROM ENCROACHMENT |
| | THAT WOULD AFFECT THE CANOPY OR ROOT ZONE OF THE TREE. |
| | STAFF HAS MET WITH THE ARBORIST THAT DEVELOPED THE PLAN |
| | FOR THE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF THE TREE. |
| | PRELIMINARY INFORMATION SHOWS THE TREE ROOT ZONE AND |
| | CANOPY ARE GOING TO BE AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION, BUT A |
| | PLAN IS PROPOSED THAT WILL MONITOR AND MANAGE THE ROOT |
| | SYSTEM AND CANOPY. FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | AS THE DESIGN PROCESS CONTINUES. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE |
| | BANYAN TREE BE DESIGNATED AS A HISTORIC TREE BY THE |
| | CITY COMMISSION. |
| | |
| | 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT A DETAIL THE PAVED AREA |
| | OF THE ENTRANCE PLAZA THAT COVERS THE ROOT ZONE OF THE |
| | BANYAN, AND HOW IT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO AVOID ANY |
| | NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO THE TREE. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON |
| | THE PEDESTAL PAVING SYSTEM AND FOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION TO |
| | BE PLACED IN THE ROOT ZONE OF THE TREE. |
| | |
| | 3. NOT SATISFIED. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442 (G) |
| | FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE |
| | VERIFIED FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WHEN A |
| | COMPLETE PLANT LIST IS SUBMITTED. THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY |
| | CHART HAS BEEN INCLUDED ON SHEET L-402, BUT LACKS ANY |
| | INFORMATION ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. PLEASE ADD THE |
| | CORRECT CODE SECTION 94-442 (G) TO THE CHART FOR |
| | REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 4. NOT SATISFIED. THE WEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER DOES NOT |
| | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443 (A)(2) ALONG |
| | THE ENTRANCE PLAZA. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE IF THIS AREA |
| | MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-444 FOR PLAZAS. |
| | MORE INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE SUPPLIED TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND |
| | SHRUBS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442 MUST BE CALCULATED |
| | ON 50 PERCENT OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-203. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE DATA TABLE TO REFLECT THE CORRECT |
| | QUANTITIES. |
| | |
| | 6. NOT SATISFIED. IF THE LANDSCAPING IS TO BE COMPLETED |
| | IN PHASES, PLEASE INDICATE HOW MANY TREES AND SHRUBS |
| | ARE GOING TO BE PROVIDED PER PHASE. IF THE PLANS ARE TO |
| | BE COMPLETED IN PHASES, THE APPLICANT COULD SPECIFY HOW |
| | MANY REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS ARE TO |
| | BE LOCATED WITHIN EACH PHASE IF THE INTENT IS TO SUBMIT |
| | AN APPLICATION FOR EACH PHASE WHEN THE EXACT DESIGN IS |
| | ESTABLISHED. |
| | |
| | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILED |
| | INFORMATION ON HOW THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING MEETS THE |
| | CRITERIA FOR THE DESIGN OPTIONS OF SECTION 94-442(E). |
| | THE CHART HAS BEEN PROVIDED, BUT IS LABELED |
| | INCORRECTLY. PLEASE ADD THE CORRECT LABEL ?SITE DESIGN |
| | FLEXIBILITY PER CODE SECTION 94-442 (E)? TO THE CHART |
| | FOR REFERENCE. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE AND DETAILS |
| | ON HOW EACH DESIGN OPTION IS MET. |
| | |
| | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED PLANT LIST |
| | WITH SPECIES, SIZES AND QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL |
| | PROPOSED. A PLANT LIST HAS BEEN INCLUDED, BUT LACKS |
| | DETAILS AS TO QUANTITIES PROVIDED TO MEET CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9. NOT SATISFIED. THE TREE SURVEY INCLUDED WITH THIS |
| | PETITION NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED AS TO WHICH TREES WILL |
| | BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. THE LIST OF TREES TO BE |
| | REMOVED MUST CONTAIN THE CANOPY DIAMETER IN ORDER TO |
| | DETERMINE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED, EXCLUDING INVASIVE |
| | EXOTICS. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASONS FOR REMOVING RATHER |
| | THAN RELOCATING THE ROYAL PALMS AND SABAL PALMS THAT |
| | ARE LISTED AS BEING IN ?GOOD? CONDITION. |
| | |
| | 10. NOT SATISFIED. THE LIGHTING PLAN CONFLICTS WITH THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN IN MANY AREAS. PLEASE REVISE TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING OR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. THE |
| | LIGHTING PLAN SHOWS MANY CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO RESOLVE |
| | CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 11. NOT SATISFIED. THE APPLICATION INDICATES THAT ALL |
| | AREAS WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE CSPD ZONING AS ONE |
| | PROJECT AND BECOME PART OF ANY LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED |
| | FOR THE PROJECT. ALL LANDSCAPING MUST BE INCLUDED, EVEN |
| | IF EXISTING, IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | LANDSCAPE CODE. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE |
| | RESIDENCES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT IN THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING |
| | THAT WILL STAY AS PART OF THE PLAN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 12. NOT SATISFIED. THE NARRATIVE MENTIONS RIGHT OF WAY |
| | LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, BUT NO PLANS OR DETAILS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED. PLEASE SUBMIT PROPOSED PLANS FOR DIXIE |
| | LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS. THE PLAN LACK DETAIL FOR THE |
| | TYPES OF PLANTS PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 13. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF GROUND |
| | MOUNTED SIGNAGE, LIGHTING FIXTURES AND UTILITIES ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO AVOID CONFLICTS |
| | WITH LANDSCAPING. PLEASE SHOW ROOT BARRIERS ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROTECT UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE LINES. |
| | ALSO PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL WITH THE LANDSCAPE |
| | DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 14. SATISFIED. THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS PETITION WILL BE |
| | REVIEWED CONCURRENTLY, AND ALL COMMENTS WILL BE |
| | INCLUDED AS PART OF THE REVIEW OF THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | 561-822-1462 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
