| Date |
Text |
| 2015-03-10 12:52:18 | ** ZONING FAILED ** |
| | |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR |
| | ON THE PLANS (WHERE APPLICABLE): |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) SUBMIT A SIGNED OWNER'S CONSENT FORM. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS APPLICATION WILL |
| | NOT MOVE FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL A TRAFFIC |
| | CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER FROM PBC HAS BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 3.) RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS FROM PBC REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | ACCESS POINTS ON AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND BELVEDERE ROAD. |
| | |
| | 4.) IN ORDER TO SUPPORT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND THE |
| | TWO (2) WAIVER REQUESTS, THE SITE PLAN MUST DEMONSTRATE |
| | HOW IT WILL CONTRIBUTE TO A MORE DESIRABLE SITE DESIGN. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ILLUSTRATIONS TO |
| | HOW THIS IS/WILL BE ADDRESSED IN THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5.) PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO SECTION 94-35(C), SITE |
| | DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR). |
| | |
| | 6.) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CONFIRMING THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS |
| | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR |
| | SERVICE. |
| | |
| | MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE CONCURRENCY SUMMARY |
| | AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) WORK WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF A CURB |
| | CUT CAN BE ADDED TO THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE IN ORDER |
| | TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL OPTIONS FOR VEHICLES TO EXIT ONTO |
| | AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SAFELY. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING AND LOADING SPACE |
| | CALCULATIONS IN THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS TABULAR. FOR |
| | BICYCLE PARKING: INCLUDE A DETAIL, WITH DIMENSIONS THAT |
| | IS SPECIFIC TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 2.) IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | PARKING STALLS ARE REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR THE PROVISION |
| | OF MORE LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE A SEPARATION BETWEEN THE PEDESTRIAN WALKING |
| | PATH AND PARKING STALLS. LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ARE HIGHLY |
| | RECOMMENDED AS BARRIERS TO PREVENT VEHICULAR |
| | ENCROACHMENT INTO PEDESTRIAN AREAS. |
| | |
| | 4.) ALL PARKING TERMINAL ISLANDS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 5 FT. IN WIDTH AND NOT LESS THAN THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | ADJACENT PARKING STALL. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(3)(A.)] |
| | |
| | 5.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. THE |
| | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 13 FT. AND 8 |
| | INCHES BY 13 FT. AND 8 INCHES, WITH A MINIMUM GATE |
| | OPENING WIDTH OF 12 FT. AND 6 INCHES AND A MINIMUM |
| | HEIGHT OF 6 FT. THE WALLS OF THE ENCLOSURE SHALL BE |
| | LANDSCAPED WITH SHRUBS AND HEDGES PLANTED AT 2 FT. |
| | INTERVALS. [ZLDR S.94-444(B), FIGURE XIV-3] |
| | |
| | 6.) WHAT IS THE SEATING CAPACITY FOR THE CONVENIENCE |
| | STORE? WILL THERE BE INDOOR SEATING? |
| | |
| | 7.) DOES THE APPLICANT INTEND ON USING WHEEL STOPS OR A |
| | 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG TO PROTECT PEDESTRIAN AND |
| | LANDSCAPED AREAS FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT? PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY/ILLUSTRATE. |
| | |
| | 8.) PROVIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE TWO (2) PROPOSED |
| | MONUMENT SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 9.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-207(D)(9) OF THE ZLDR, THE |
| | OUTDOOR STORAGE OF GOODS IS NOT PERMITTED. THERE SEEMS |
| | TO BE AN ICE STORAGE BIN LOCATED WITHIN THE LOADING |
| | ZONE OF THE PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 10.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TWO CUT-THROUGHS IN THE MIDDLE |
| | OF THE EXTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST |
| | QUADRANT OF THE WAWA SITE. ARE THESE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS |
| | POINTS? IF SO, WHERE DO THESE ACCESS POINTS CONNECT TO? |
| | |
| | ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ELEVATIONS SEEM TO BE LABELED INCORRECTLY. ALSO, |
| | PLEASE LABEL THE ELEVATIONS WITH DIRECTIONS (I.E. |
| | NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST). |
| | |
| | 2.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED CANOPY? |
| | |
| | 3.) ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW |
| | BY A PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 4.) IT'S RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS TO THE LEFT AND |
| | REAR ELEVATIONS TO BALANCE OUT/BREAK UP THE BLANK |
| | FACADES (I.E. ADDITIONAL FENESTRATIONS, GLAZING, |
| | RECESSES, ETC.) |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | MONUMENT SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PROPOSED "OPEN 24 HOURS" SIGN ON THE CANOPY IS |
| | NOT PERMITTED. [ZLDR S.94-408] |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRICS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED, STAMPED AND |
| | SEALED BY A QUALIFIED ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | INNOVATIVE DESIGN: |
| | |
| | PER SECTION 94-207 OF THE ZLDR, THE APPLICANT MUST |
| | ILLUSTRATE INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT |
| | TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE |
| | DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. STAFF ENCOURAGES THE APPLICANT |
| | TO STRONGLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 1.) RECONFIGURE THE SITE TO PROVIDE THE CONVENIENCE |
| | STORE WITH A STREET FRONTAGE. |
| | |
| | 2.) CONSIDER RELOCATING THE RETENTION POND TO THE SIDE |
| | OR REAR OF THE SITE TO ALLOW THE CONVENIENCE STORE TO |
| | HAVE A GREATER PRESENCE ALONG A STREET FRONT. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL NOTES: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPERTY IS BEING EVALUATED AS |
| | AN ENTIRE SITE. ANY FUTURE INTENT TO SUBDIVIDE THE |
| | PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENTS AND A |
| | UNITY OF CONTROL FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. |
| | |
| | * NOTE THAT ALL NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR REMODELING, WHERE THE TOTAL |
| | VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF ALL BUILDINGS ON A |
| | PROJECT SITE ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $500,000, IS |
| | SUBJECT TO THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS |
| | OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE V OF THE CITY?S CODE OF |
| | ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 ? |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT |
| | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($600). |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE, PLANNER @ (561) 822-1458 |
| | IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |