| Date |
Text |
| 2015-03-30 19:12:32 | PB 1222M ? RESUBMITTAL 3/20/2015 |
| | BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD |
| | 2901 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | APRIL 17, 2015, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY 19, 2015 |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 30, 2015), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESUBMITTAL DID NOT ADDRESS |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS; THEREFORE, THE APPLICANT |
| | WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF 20% OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | GENERAL |
| | |
| | 1) CONTINUE TO EVALUATE AS PROJECT MOVES FORWARD: WHAT |
| | INNOVATIVE FEATURES OF THE PROJECT WHICH MAKE THIS |
| | PROJECT MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE THAN AN AUTO |
| | DEALERSHIP THAT MEETS ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS? AT A |
| | MINIMUM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES WAIVERS TO |
| | THE SIGNAGE, INTERNAL SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPE, AND |
| | NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS. |
| | |
| | 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE SITE NEEDS TO |
| | BE SHOWN ON ONE UNIFIED PLAN. SUBMITTING TWO PLANS WITH |
| | CHANGED OVERLAPPING AREAS AND UNDEFINED DATA TABLES IS |
| | NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | |
| | 3) CONDITION: A UNITY OF TITLE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE FIRST BUILDING COMPRISING OF THE |
| | NEW PORSCHE, BENTLEY, ROLLS BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4) WAIVERS REQUESTED: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INTERIOR LOT LINES WITH THE |
| | EXISTING BRAMAN MOTORCARS DSI. ANY NON-COMPLAINANT |
| | AREAS WOULD NEED TO BE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED AS WAIVERS |
| | WITHIN THE CPD. |
| | |
| | 5) CONDITION: PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE UTILITY |
| | EASEMENTS BEING ABANDONED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE BUILDING LOCATED ON THE |
| | EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: PARKING AND LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE |
| | SHALL BE SHOWN AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR |
| | FOR EACH PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. STAFF HAS CALCULATED |
| | THAT THE NEW PORSCHE BUILDING WILL REQUIRE 49 PARKING |
| | SPACES (TWO OF WHICH ADA) WHEN IT BECOMES OPERATIONAL. |
| | THE PLANS ONLY SHOW 26 WITH ONE ADA SPACE. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, THE WESTERN BUFFER OF THE PARKING LOT |
| | DOES NOT HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE CUSTOMER |
| | PARKING. HOW WILL TRASH SERVICE BE PROVIDED? PLEASE |
| | VERIFY THAT THE BENTLEY, ROLLS, USED CAR AND BALANCE OF |
| | THE GARAGE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ONE TIME. |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC |
| | |
| | 7) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER. |
| | |
| | 8) WAIVER REQUESTED: THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LISTS |
| | SEVEN CURB CUTS BEING USED WHILE THE LATEST STREET VIEW |
| | SHOWS ONLY SIX BEING USED. PLEASE BE AWARE THE SITE |
| | EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF PERMITTED ACCESS POINTS TO THE |
| | STREET NETWORK. OPENINGS ALONG BOTH OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD AND EXCHANGE COURT NEED TO BE REDUCED. |
| | |
| | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A DRIVEWAY PREDETERMINATION |
| | LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM FDOT FOR THE WORK WITHIN THE |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 10) CONDITION: A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR ANY WORK WITHIN THE FDOT OR THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 11) CONDITION: ALL CURB CUTS THAT ARE NOT BEING USED |
| | SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE SIDEWALK MADE FLUSH WITH THE |
| | ADJACENT SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 12) CONDITION: THE PROPOSAL TO PLANT IN THE EXCHANGE |
| | COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF THE |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION. IRRIGATION SHALL BE |
| | SUPPLIED TO THESE TREES. A RECORDED AGREEMENT TO |
| | MAINTAIN AND REPLACE THE TREES AND IRRIGATION IS |
| | REQUIRED FROM BRAMAN. |
| | |
| | SITE |
| | |
| | 13) CONDITION: ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER GROUND |
| | OR ROOF MOUNTED, UTILITY EQUIPMENT, GENERATORS, |
| | TRANSFORMERS, ETC. SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW OF THE |
| | PUBLIC. |
| | |
| | 14) WAIVER REQUESTED: THE EAST SIDE SETBACK IS REQUIRED |
| | TO BE 27 FEET SINCE THE BUILDING THAT IS BEING |
| | CONSTRUCTED IS 75 FEET 8 INCHES TALL. |
| | |
| | 15) REPEAT COMMENT: HOW TALL ARE THE GATES? THE COMMENT |
| | RESPONSE LISTS THE GATES AS 10 FEET TALL. PROVIDE A |
| | DETAIL THAT INCLUDES THE FENCE HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | THE GATES ALONG EXCHANGE COURT MAY NOT EXCEED EIGHT (8) |
| | FEET TALL. STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT 10 FOOT TALL GATES |
| | ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS THESE WILL BE OUT OF |
| | SCALE WITH THE SITE CONDITIONS AT THE FRONTAGE LINE. |
| | |
| | 16) NEW COMMENT: IS THE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE |
| | ROLLS ROYCE DEALERSHIP INTENDED TO OPEN INTO THE |
| | LANDSCAPED AREA WITH THE HEDGE? |
| | |
| | 17) NEW COMMENT: THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE/COMPACTOR |
| | SHALL BE IN AN ENCLOSURE WITH A PERIMETER HEDGE ON |
| | THREE SIDES. THE PLANS SHALL SHOW A DIMENSIONED DETAIL |
| | OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND HAVE THE DIMENSION LINES |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE ENCLOSURE MAY NOT BE ACCESSED |
| | FROM THE EAST SIDE DUE TO THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACES. |
| | THERE CONCEPTUAL PAVING, DRAINAGE, WATER AND WASTEWATER |
| | PLAN SHOWS TWO WATER METERS IN THE DRIVE AISLE TO |
| | ACCESS THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. PLEASE |
| | FIX THESE ITEMS. |
| | |
| | PARKING |
| | |
| | 18) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY THE |
| | PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE SITE DUE THE VARIOUS PLANS |
| | SHOWING DIFFERING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE SAME AREAS |
| | (EX. THE BUILDING D AREAS AND THE PORSCHE SERVICE |
| | RECEPTION LIST DIFFERING SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SITE AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE PRE-OWNED AREA IS LISTED |
| | WITH A DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGE ON SHEETS SP-1.0 AND |
| | A-1.1). THE SITE PLAN PARKING DATA TABLE INCORRECTLY |
| | EXCLUDES THE SERVICE PARTS AND STORAGE AREAS BY SHOWING |
| | IT COMBINED WITH THE NUMBER OF SERVICE BAYS. PARKING |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SERVICE PARTS AND STORAGE |
| | AREAS USING THE ENCLOSED AREA RATE OF 1 PARKING SPACE |
| | PER 500 SQUARE FEET. PROVIDE A COLOR CODED FLOOR PLAN |
| | THAT DEMARCATES THE INTERIOR SQUARE FOOTAGE, THE |
| | SERVICE BAY AREAS AND INTERNAL VEHICLE CIRCULATION |
| | AREAS. THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF EACH AREA SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED SO THAT STAFF CAN CALCULATE THE PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 19) REVISED COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD AND RACK DETAILS |
| | DO NOT SHOW THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE BICYCLE PADS. THE |
| | DETAIL INCLUDED ON SHEET SP-4 ONLY SHOWS PARKING FOR |
| | SIX BICYCLES, NOT SEVEN AS STATED ON THE PLANS. PLEASE |
| | REMEMBER THAT ONE BICYCLE RACK ELEMENT HOLDS TWO |
| | BICYCLES, SO EACH BICYCLE PAD WILL HAVE AN EVEN NUMBER |
| | OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THE BICYCLE PADS SHALL SHOW |
| | CODE COMPLIANT DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN (THE BICYCLE PADS |
| | DO NOT SCALE AT THE REQUIRED SIX FOOT DEPTH). |
| | |
| | 20) NEW COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A BICYCLE PAD |
| | BEING LOCATED UNDER THE RAMP IN THE GARAGE. THIS |
| | BICYCLE RACK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE HOW IT WILL BE ACCESSED IN LIGHT OF THE |
| | PLANS SHOWING THIS AREA SURROUNDED BY SOLID WALLS. WHAT |
| | IS THE CLEARANCE AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION? |
| | |
| | 21) REVISED COMMENT: THE AREA BEHIND THE FUTURE MINI |
| | DEALERSHIP (UNDER THE CANOPY) IS SHOWN AS HAVING A |
| | DEAD-END DOUBLE ROW OF PARKING. THERE SHALL BE ONE |
| | SPACE AT THE END MARKED AS A TURNAROUND SPACE WITH THE |
| | BACK-OUT ASSIST AREA INDENTING THREE (3) FEET FROM THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF THE SPACE. |
| | |
| | 22) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DIMENSION TAGS FOR EACH NEW |
| | PARKING BAY - CURB FACE TO CURB FACE. THE WIDTH OF THE |
| | PARKING SPACES FLUCTUATES BETWEEN 8.5 FEET WIDE OR 9 |
| | FEET WIDE IN DIFFERING ROWS, SO THE DIMENSION LINES |
| | WILL ENSURE THAT THE CURBING IS INSTALLED IN THE PROPER |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 23) REVISED COMMENT: THE FLOOR GARAGE FLOOR PLANS SHALL |
| | INDICATE THE AREAS OF VEHICLE STORAGE AND SERVICE |
| | PARKING. |
| | |
| | 24) NEW COMMENT: WHAT OCCURS IN THE "RECONDITIONING |
| | SPACE"? |
| | |
| | 25) NEW COMMENT: HOW WILL THE WASH BAY ON THE 5TH FLOOR |
| | OF THE GARAGE FUNCTION? IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THERE |
| | IS ANYWHERE FOR THE WATER TO DRAIN. |
| | |
| | 26) REVISED COMMENT: THE LOADING ZONE MENTIONED IN THE |
| | RESPONSE AS ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE PHASE 1 GARAGE |
| | NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY LABELED ON THE GARAGE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 27) NEW COMMENT: THE ADA PARKING SPACE IN FRONT OF THE |
| | PORSCHE DEALERSHIP IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A WHEEL STOP TO |
| | KEEP CARS FROM DRIVING ONTO THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE |
| | |
| | 28) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | MINI IS ONLY PERMITTED THREE FACADE SIGNS BASED ON THE |
| | CURRENT LAYOUT OF BUILDING A. CHANGES TO CONNECT THIS |
| | BUILDING TO BUILDING B WOULD REDUCE THE NUMBER OF |
| | PERMITTED FACADE SIGNS. WITHOUT FURTHER INFORMATION, |
| | STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE, BUT IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THE AT LEAST THE SOUTH ELEVATION SIGN IS TWICE AS |
| | LARGE AS PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 29) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: THE NEW BUILDING |
| | HAS 12 FACADE SIGNS. ONLY SIX FACADE SIGNS ARE |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 30) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: DIMENSIONS WERE |
| | NOT PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH FACADE |
| | SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PERMITTED, NOR WAS INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED ON HOW MUCH FACADE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS |
| | PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 31) REVISED COMMENT: HF SIGN A IS NOT SHOWN IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH ITS ORIENTATION ON THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 32) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: STAFF CALCULATES |
| | 1,640 SQ. FT. OF HIGH FREESTANDING SIGNAGE PROPOSED |
| | ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (HF SIGNS B, C, D1, D2 AND |
| | E). WHICH EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED 1,363 SQ. FT. |
| | PERMITTED. USING LOW FREESTANDING SIGNS LIKE IN THE |
| | CONCEPT SKETCH COULD ALLEVIATE THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | EXCESS. |
| | |
| | 33) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: THERE ARE |
| | FREESTANDING SIGNS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH NO DETAILS |
| | ASSOCIATED WITH THEM IN FRONT OF THE NEW BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | LIGHTING |
| | |
| | 34) REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS NOT SUBMITTED: THE |
| | SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBMITTED PHOTOMETRIC BASE PLAN |
| | DIFFERS FROM THE SITE PLAN AT THE NUMBER OF PARKING |
| | SPACES. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME BASE CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 35) REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS NOT SUBMITTED: |
| | ILLUMINATION WITHIN A COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | MAY NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE |
| | BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE SOUTH, EAST AND |
| | NORTH PROPERTY LINES ALL HAVE VALUES EXCEEDING ONE |
| | FOOTCANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PHOTOMETRIC |
| | NUMBERS SHALL BE EXTENDED PAST THE PROPERTY LINE AND |
| | VERIFY THAT THE ONE FOOTCANDLE STANDARD IS NOT |
| | EXCEEDED. |
| | |
| | 36) REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS NOT SUBMITTED: THERE ARE |
| | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS INDICATED |
| | AS REMAINING ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND THE LIGHT POLE |
| | LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LIGHTING PLAN. THIS |
| | INCONSISTENCY IS ON THE SITE PLAN AS WELL. |
| | |
| |
Print |
