| Date |
Text |
| 2015-02-04 15:12:44 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, |
| | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM |
| | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. |
| | |
| | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE |
| | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS |
| | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. |
| | |
| | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY |
| | WITH NFPA 241. |
| | |
| | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING |
| | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. |
| | |
| | 3. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE |
| | DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF |
| | POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. |
| | |
| | 4. INSUFFICIENT DETAIL IS SHOWN TO ACCURATELY PROVIDE |
| | COMMENTS TO THE FIRE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS OF EACH |
| | PROPOSED OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 5. EACH PROPOSED OCCUPANCY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE |
| | PREVENTION CODE AND ALL ASSOCIATED APPLICABLE CODES AND |
| | STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 6. A FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR EACH PROPOSED OCCUPANCY UNLESS SUFFICIENT |
| | AND APPROVED CODE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE |
| | CONTRARY. THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL REMAIN FULLY |
| | FUNCTIONAL DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. |
| | |
| | 7. A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR EACH PROPOSED OCCUPANCY SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. THE |
| | PLAN SHALL SHOW THE PROPOSED OCCUPANY LOAD, COMMON |
| | PATHS OF TRAVEL, FIRE WALL LOCATIONS, RATED CORRIDORS, |
| | EXIT PATHS, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, EMERGENCY |
| | LIGHTS, AND FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS. THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING EXIT CAPACITY SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PROPOSED OCCUPANCY CALCULATION WHERE APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 8. FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | PROTECTION OF THE PROPOSED PORTE COCHERE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
