| Date |
Text |
| 2015-04-16 17:02:43 | 1.PROJECT DATA SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE FAR |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | 2. THE MAJORITY OF THE SPACES INDICATED ON SHEET A-601 |
| | AS QUALIFIED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES DO NOT MEET THE POS |
| | REQUIREMENTS. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS INTENDED TO |
| | CREATE A GATHERING PUBLIC SPACE SUCH AS A PLAZA OR |
| | PARK. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE GENERAL CIRCULATION |
| | AREAS. |
| | 3. COMPLIED. |
| | 4. COMPLIED |
| | 5. PLEASE LOOK AT THE FOOTPRINT DEFINITION. FOOTPPINT |
| | IS CALCULATED BASICALLY AS THE AREA COVERED BY A ROOF |
| | ON EACH LEVEL, NOT NECESSARILY ENCLOSED, BUT COVERED. |
| | 6. THE MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT LENGHT FOR THIS DISTRICT IS |
| | 350 FEET, INCLUDING A MINIMUM OF 60 FEET SEPARATION |
| | BETWEEN PODIUM ELEMENTS. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH THIS PROVISION. FURTHER DISCUSSION WILL BE |
| | NECESSARY TO DETERMINE IF THE DAC CAN APPROVED THE |
| | FOOTPRINT SEPARATION TO BE LOCATED AT THE ROOF TOP DECK |
| | LEVEL OR A CODE AMENDMEN. |
| | 7. DAC APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ALLOW CURB CUTS |
| | THAT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 25 FEET WIDTH PERMITTED. |
| | 8. PROPOSED DROP-OFF AND PASSENGER LOADING FOR HOTEL |
| | AND RESIDENTIAL USE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS IN SEC 94-109. |
| | 9. AT THIS POINT THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE |
| | ANY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. PLEASE BE AWARE THE WIDTH OF |
| | THE PARKING SPACES IS LARGER IF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE |
| | ADJACENT TO THE SPACE. DEAD END PARKING AREAS SHALL |
| | HAVE A TURN AROUND SPACE. |
| | 10. ADDITIONAL DETAIL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE LOCATION |
| | OF THE BIKE FACILITIES. EXACT DIMENSION OF THE SPACE |
| | AND LOCATION OF RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | 11. OK. |
| | 12. PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WALTER TO START THE ART IN |
| | PUBLIC PLACES PROCESS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THE PROJECT |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEDICATE 1% OF THE CONSTRUCTION |
| | COST FOR AN ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. SOME OF THE ART |
| | INSTALLATIONS MAY QUALIFIED BUT THEY REQUIRE APPROVAL |
| | BY THE AIPP COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COMMISSION. |
| | 13. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE REVISED. |
| | 14. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO COMFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FACADE ARTICULATION. THE FLOOR |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY OF THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE |
| | FACADES. |
| | 15. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE |
| | INDICATED IN THE FIRST FLOOR DOES NOT QUALIFY. |
| | 16.FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY. |
| | 17. IS THE BRIDGE TO THE TRAIN STATION AT THE 2ND LEVEL |
| | OF THE TRANSIT VILLAGE? IS IT LOCATED AT THE SAME |
| | ELEVATION? PLEASE SHOW HOW THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE |
| | TRI-RAIL BRIDGE AND THE DECK IS PROPOSED. |
| | 18. OK. |
| | 19. MORE DETAIL NECESSARY. |
| | 20. OK. |
| | 21. SEE COMMENT NO. 12. |
| | 22-26- RENDERINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE DAC SPECIAL |
| | REVIEW, AS WELL AS MORE DETAIL ON THE BUILDING DESIGN, |
| | FACADE ARTICULATION, LOCATION OR DOORS, WINDOWS ETC. |
| | 27-30. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA |
| | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
