| Date |
Text |
| 2014-12-10 10:17:18 | PB 891AA |
| | PALM BEACH OUTLETS PBA 2B REVISIONS |
| | 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 10, |
| | 2015), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) THE SITE DATA TABLE SHALL BE AMENDED AT PROPOSED |
| | GROSS FLOOR AREA TO NOT STATE "THIS APPLICATION". FOR |
| | FUTURE REVIEW CLARITY, IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE: |
| | |
| | GROSS FLOOR AREA: 818,605 SF (PH1) |
| | 932,397 SF (PH1 + PH2) |
| | |
| | THIS SHOULD ALSO BE REFLECTED IN THE CHART. NOTE: IT IS |
| | VERY CLEAR HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IN EACH PHASE ON THE |
| | MASTER PLAN PBA CHART. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE THE OVERALL FINAL SITE PLAN SHOWING THE |
| | PHASE 2 BUILDOUT. THIS SHOULD BE A STANDALONE FSP-1.1, |
| | NOT THE BUILDINGS GHOSTED ON TOP OF THE CURRENT PARKING |
| | LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON FSP-1. |
| | |
| | 3) TWO ADA SPACES APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REMOVED WITHOUT |
| | THE CORRESPONDING UPDATE OF THE DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| | 4) THE UTILITY LAYERS AND SOME OF THE INTERIOR CORRIDOR |
| | LAYERS DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN TURNED ON FOR FSP-2.1 |
| | AND 3.1. THE LAYERS SHOWN ON THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED |
| | PLANS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE NEW PLANS. |
| | |
| | 5) THE BICYCLE RACK SOUTHEAST OF THE VALET STAND SHALL |
| | BE 11.5 FEET IN WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 6) A PEDESTRIAN CROSS WALK SHALL BE INSTALLED ACROSS |
| | THE NARROW PORTION OF THE DRIVE AISLE SOUTH OF THE |
| | VALET STAND TO PROVIDE MORE OPTIONS TO THE WALKWAY |
| | NETWORK. THERE IS A CROSSING GENERALLY SHOWN IN THIS |
| | LOCATION ON THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PHASE 2 PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7) SIGNS NOTIFYING DRIVERS OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS |
| | SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR THE CROSSWALKS ADJACENT TO THE |
| | VALET STAND. |
| | |
| | 8) THERE ARE UNSCREENED DUMPSTERS THAT ARE LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE BUILDING J-1 SERVICE COURT. THESE DUMPSTERS |
| | SHALL EITHER BE LOCATED WITHIN AN ENCLOSURE THAT IS |
| | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, OR BE REMOVED. ALTERNATIVELY, A |
| | SCREEN GATE MAY BE INSTALLED TO COVER THE ENTRANCE TO |
| | THE SERVICE AREA. |
| | |
| | 9) THE SERVICE COURT FOR THE NEW PHASE 2 BUILDING NO |
| | LONGER SHOWS THE FOUNDATION PLANTING EXTENDING FIVE (5) |
| | FEET PAST THE SERVICE COURT OPENING AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | DESIGN GUIDELINES. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SOUTH SIDE |
| | OF THE OPENING. |
| | |
| | 10) THE COMPACTOR SHOWN IN THE SERVICE COURT FOR THE |
| | NEW PHASE 2 BUILDING IS NO LONGER SCREENED BY THE |
| | SERVICE COURT WALL. |
| | |
| | 11) PROVIDE A REVISED OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING |
| | PHASE 2 (SHEET LP-1.1) AND SHEETS LP-2.1 AND 2.3 WITH |
| | ALL THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. THESE WILL BE |
| | THE PLANS OF RECORD FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILD-OUT OF THE |
| | PB OUTLETS. STAFF WILL NOT ACCEPT THE NEED TO MULTIPLE |
| | DOCUMENTS TO PIECE TOGETHER THE FINAL APPROVED |
| | LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 12) PLEASE CONSIDER PLANNING SOME MORE TREES ALONG THE |
| | NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW BUILDING AND THE J-3 SERVICE |
| | COURT TO SOFTEN THE LONG FACADES. |
| | |
| | 13) A NEW BICYCLE RACK (NO DIMENSIONS) IS SHOWN EAST OF |
| | THE NEW BUS DROP OFF. THE SITE PLAN STILL SHOWS THE |
| | EXISTING BICYCLE RACK BETWEEN THE NEW BUS DROP OFF |
| | CANOPIES. WHILE STAFF SUPPORTS THE PROVISION OF MORE |
| | BICYCLE PARKING, IS IT THE INTENT TO HAVE BOTH RACKS? |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW EITHER RACK. |
| | |
| | 14) BASED ON STAFF PEDESTRIAN OBSERVATION AND |
| | EXPERIENCE, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT STEPPING STONE PATHS |
| | (OR EVEN FULL SIDEWALKS) BE INSTALLED LEADING FROM THE |
| | EXECUTIVE CENTER ENTRY ROAD SIDEWALK TO THE ADJACENT |
| | PARKING AREAS (STAFF HAS THIS ANNOTATED ON A PLAN TO |
| | SHOW EXAMPLES). |
| | |
| | 15) PLEASE UPDATE PLANS TO REFERENCE THE NEW BUILDING |
| | AS J-11. |
| | |
| |
Print |
