| Date |
Text |
| 2015-01-30 11:25:09 | ** FAILED ** |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE CHECK THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: |
| | GROSS BUILDING, FLOOR AREA RATIO, BUILDING AREA LOT |
| | COVERAGE. THE NUMBERS/CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE |
| | INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 2.) CLARITY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE "EXISTING" |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE "PROPOSED" SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | |
| | 3.) BASED ON STAFF'S CALCULATIONS, A MINIMUM OF 989 |
| | SHARED PARKING SPACES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE SHOPPING |
| | CENTER. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE HOW THIS PARKING REQUIREMENT |
| | WILL BE MET ON THE PROPERTY. (NOTE: THE SURVEY SHOWS A |
| | TOTAL OF 974 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | PROPERTY). |
| | |
| | 4.) THE NOTE REGARDING THE 50 PERCENT REDUCTION IN |
| | RESTAURANT SHARED PARKING IS INCORRECT AND DOES NOT |
| | APPLY. PLEASE DELETE THE NOTE FROM THE TABLE AND REVISE |
| | THE CALCULATIONS ACCORDING TO THE CITY'S ZLDR PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | THE 10.8% LANDSCAPE COVERAGE IS "PROPOSED" AND NOT |
| | "EXISTING." |
| | |
| | 5.) CLARIFY THAT THE 1 PARKING SPACE PER 250 SQ. FT. IS |
| | THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR RETAIL USES. |
| | |
| | 6.) REVIEW THE NUMBER OF HANDICAP PARKING SPACES |
| | PROVIDED ON THE PROPERTY. THERE SEEMS TO BE 27 SPACES |
| | PROVIDED AND NOT 25 SPACES AS NOTED IN THE DATA |
| | TABULAR. |
| | |
| | 7.) CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHARED PARKING REQUIREMENT IS |
| | INACCURATE. PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) CHECK ALL CALCULATIONS IN THE CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | TABLE. THE NUMBERS DO NOT ADD UP BASED ON INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED IN THE EXISTING TREE PLAN AND THE PLANT LIST |
| | TABULAR. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE SHOW/CLARIFY HOW THE 325 REQUIRED TREES HAD |
| | BEEN DETERMINED IN THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3.) A 5 FT. WIDE BUFFER STRIP SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG |
| | THE ENTIRE EDGE OF THE PROPERTY. AT LEAST ONE (1) SHADE |
| | OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN THE REQUIRED |
| | BUFFER STRIP FOR EACH LINEAR FEET; A HEDGE SHALL BE |
| | PLANTED AT 2 FT. INTERVALS. [ZLDR S.94-443, TABLE XIV] |
| | |
| | 4.) ALL REQUIRED SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES SHALL |
| | POSSESS A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. OF CLEAR TRUNK SPACE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-445(4)(A)] |
| | |
| | 5.) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE CHANGES MADE |
| | TO THE SITE PLAN. THE NEW TRASH COMPACTOR AND LOADING |
| | ZONE ARE MISSING. PLEASE ADD THESE FEATURES TO MATCH |
| | THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6.) THE TRASH COMPACTOR SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. |
| | SCREENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE |
| | CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY |
| | DURABLE WOOD OR STEEL. WALLS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH |
| | SHRUBS AND HEDGES AT 2 FT. INTERVALS. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-444(B)] |
| | |
| | 7.) ADD VISIBILITY TRIANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR S. |
| | 94-305(E) AT ALL ACCESS POINTS. [REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | OTHER NOTES: |
| | |
| | 1.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREES ON THE PROPERTY, |
| | THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN A TREE |
| | ALTERATION PERMIT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 1/2 INCHES |
| | X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, |
| | AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| |
Print |
