| Date |
Text |
| 2014-12-30 16:37:02 | CASE NO. 1663 |
| | 3100 N. FLAGLER DOCK CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT - 1ST |
| | RESUBMITTAL 12/30/14 |
| | 3100 N. FLAGLER |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWELVE |
| | (12) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | JANUARY 23, 2015, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, |
| | 2015 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE THESE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 30, |
| | 2015), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE |
| | NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED; THEREFORE, THE APPLICANT IS |
| | ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($720). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEYOR SHALL PROVIDE A SKETCH |
| | WHICH SHOWS THE DOCK ON FUTURE LOT 1 AND THE DIMENSIONS |
| | FROM THE DOCK TO THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF PROPOSED |
| | LOT 1. THE SKETCH SHALL SHOW MIDDLE ONE THIRD SETBACK |
| | LINES FOR NEW LOTS 1 AND 2. THESE DIMENSIONS WILL BE |
| | USED AS PART OF THE SETBACK WAIVER RECOMMENDATION BY |
| | STAFF. |
| | |
| | 2) WHILE NOT AFFECTING THE FURTHER PROCESSING OF THE |
| | APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT IS ON NOTICE THAT THE |
| | EXISTING BOATHOUSE ROOF, THE PILINGS EAST OF NEW LOT 2 |
| | AND THE WOOD PILING EAST OF THE DOCK SHALL BE REMOVED |
| | AS NONE OF THESE WERE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A |
| | PERMIT ISSUED BY THE CITY. THE ORIGINAL BOATHOUSE ROOF, |
| | WHILE INCLUDED ON THE ORIGINAL 1963 DOCK PERMIT, WAS |
| | REMOVED FROM THE DOCK FOR A PERIOD IN EXCESS OF 12 |
| | MONTHS AND THUS LOST ANY GRANDFATHERED STATUS. |
| | |
| | 3) ALL DEMOLITION SHALL OCCUR WITH A PERMIT WILL BE A |
| | CONDITION OF ANY CITY APPROVAL ACTION. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
