| Date |
Text |
| 2014-09-02 09:56:05 | THIS REVIEW IS CONDUCTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT |
| | THE AAF FACILITY IT IS NOT REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | WPB ZONING REGULATIONS DUE TO FEDERAL REGULATIONS. |
| | 1. WHY IS THE PARKING CALCULATION INDICATED IN THE |
| | DRAWINGS ONLY BASED ON 13,945SF? THE TOTAL SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE FOR THE STATION IS 29,272SF. |
| | 2. PARKING STALL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 16' LONG WITH A |
| | 2' CANTILEVER. |
| | 3.PLEASE SHOW THE CONNECTION OF THE NEW ROADWAY AND |
| | SIDEWALK ON DATURA STREET WITH EXISTING SIDEWALK AND |
| | CURB. |
| | 4. SHEET C-006 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN: |
| | SECTION C-C OF THE NEW ACCESS ROAD SHOWS A 3.67' FOOT |
| | SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD. STAFF BELIEVES |
| | THAT THIS SIDEWALK WIDTH IS INSUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | THE LEVEL OF FUTURE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY THAT IS |
| | EXPECTED IN THIS AREA. |
| | 5. SHEET C-007 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN: |
| | PLEASE SHOW THE RESULTS OF AUTOTURN FOR THE LARGEST |
| | VEHICLE EXPECTED TO REGULARLY MAKE TURNING MOVEMENTS |
| | (I.E. CITY TROLLEYS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE NEW |
| | ACCESS ROAD WITH DATURA AND EVERNIA STREETS. |
| | 6.PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED SECTION OF THE ACCESS ROAD |
| | NORTH OF DATURA STREET. |
| | 7. THE PLANS DO NOT DEPICT ANY BICYCLE PARKING. PER |
| | PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH AAF STAFF, THE CITY WOULD |
| | LIKE TO HAVE BIKE PARKING IN THE VICINITY OF THE |
| | STATION. |
| | 8. THE PLANS DO NOT DEPICT ANY STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS OR |
| | AMENITIES (I.E. BENCHES) IN THE VICINITY OF THE |
| | STATION. STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THAT STREETSCAPE |
| | ELEMENTS BE INCORPORATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE |
| | STATION. |
| | 9. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED LOCATION OF LIGHT FIXTURES. |
| | ARE YOU PROPOSING SPECIALTY FIXTURES OR THE STANDARD |
| | CITY FIXTURE? |
| | 10. WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED MATERIALS FOR THE PLAZA AND |
| | SIDEWALKS ALONG NEW ACCESS ROAD? |
| | 11. THE NEW ACCESS ROAD IS INDICATED AS A RAISED ROAD |
| | BETWEEN EVERNIA ST AND THE ALLEY. STAFF SUGGEST THE |
| | SPECIAL TREATMENT BE EXTENDED TO DATURA STREET, IF |
| | DONE. |
| | 12. THE PLANS DEPICT A "FPL YARD - WALLED AND GATED" |
| | AND A "UTILITY AND TRASH YARD - WALLED AND GATED". THE |
| | PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY DETAILS ON EITHER ONE OF THESE |
| | AREAS. ALSO, IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THESE AREAS WILL |
| | BE SCREENED WITH ANY LANDSCAPING. STAFF WOULD REQUEST |
| | THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS ON |
| | THE WALLS AND GATES FOR THESE AREAS AND ALSO EVALUATE |
| | THEIR SCREENING WITH LANDSCAPING. |
| | 13. SHEETS A-051, A-111, AND A-201 SHOW A POLE FENCE |
| | SURROUNDING BOTH THE EAST AND WEST PERIMETER OF THE FEC |
| | ROW. WHILE SHEET A-201 SHOWS AND ELEVATION OF THE POLE |
| | FENCE, STAFF WOULD REQUEST THAT MORE DETAILS BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE LOOK OF THIS FENCE. ALSO, IT APPEARS |
| | THAT SEVERAL PORTIONS OF THIS FENCE WILL NOT BE |
| | SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING. STAFF WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE |
| | FENCE BE SCREENED WITH EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING. IN |
| | GENERAL FURTHER DISCUSSIONS ARE NECESSARY TO ADVANCE |
| | THE DESIGN OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AROUND THE |
| | STATION. |
| | 14. SHEET A-111 SHOWS FENCE ON WEST SIDE LOCATED 4' |
| | INSIDE THE FEC ROW. CAN THE FENCE ON EAST SIDE BE |
| | LOCATED AT THE SAME DISTANCE FROM THE EASTERN TRACKS TO |
| | ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL ROOM FOR LANDSCAPING ALONG |
| | QUADRILLE? |
| | 15. WHAT TYPE OF PLANTING AREA OR TREE GRATES ARE |
| | PROPOSED FOR THE POINCIANA TREES? |
| | 16. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW POINCIANAS ON THE |
| | EAST SIDE OF ROAD BETWEEN ALLEY AND DATURA ALONG |
| | ON-STREET PARKING, OR ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROAD SOUTH OF |
| | THE ALLEY. IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON FOR THIS TREE |
| | GAP? |
| | 17. THE POINCIANAS SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROAD NORTH |
| | OF ALLEY ARE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. |
| | 18. THERE IS AN EXISTING SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF |
| | THE CITY GARAGE. WHAT IS THE DISTANCE FROM THAT |
| | SIDEWALK TO THE NEW TRACKS? DOES IT NEED TO BE REMOVED? |
| | WILL IT BE REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPE? |
| | 19. AS INDICATED ON LA-1, SOME ON-STREET PARKING SPACES |
| | WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED. ANY REMOVAL OF ON-STREET |
| | PARKING WILL REQUIRE THE PAYMENT OF A PARKING REMOVAL |
| | FEE. |
| | 20. IS THE EXISTING ALLEY GOING TO REMAIN OPEN TO THE |
| | PUBLIC AS A PUBLIC ROW? IS IT GOING TO BE |
| | RESTORED/REPAVED FOR USE? THE EAST END OF ALLEY IS |
| | SHOWN WITH A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (C-007). |
| | 21. PLEASE INDICATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE NEW |
| | CROSSING ARMS ON CLEMATIS STREET AND FERN STREET. |
| | 22. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE |
| | DECORATIVE ELEMENTS SLAVAGED FROM THE DATURA BUILDING. |
| | 23. DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE ANY AREA FOR THE POTENTIAL |
| | LOCATION FOR THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AT EVERNIA STREET. |
| | |
| |
Print |
