| Date |
Text |
| 2014-11-04 13:43:56 | CASE NO. ZBA 3311 - RESUBMITTAL 9/19/14 |
| | FPL MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER |
| | 6000 NORTH FLAGLER DR. |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 3, 2014), THE CASE |
| | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | REPEAT COMMET: THE CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRE |
| | THAT THE SITE PLAN BE REVIEWED AS AN INFORMAL SITE |
| | PLAN. THESE COMMENTS RELATE TO THE SITE PLAN; HOWEVER, |
| | FPL HAS NOT YET FILED THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW |
| | APPLICATION. PLANS TO ADDRESS THE REMAINING COMMENTS |
| | SHALL BE FILED AS PART OF THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING |
| | EASEMENTS. STAFF NOTES THAT THE CURRENT DRAINAGE |
| | EASEMENT TRAVERSING EAST/WEST ACROSS THE SITE IS NOT |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE REMEMBER THE CONDITIONS OF |
| | CERTIFICATION REQUIRE THAT FPL SHALL ASSIST THE CITY IN |
| | CORRECTING THE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SO |
| | THAT IT CORRESPONDS WITH THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING |
| | DRAINAGE PIPE. |
| | |
| | 3) PARTIAL REPEAT: WHO IS PROVIDING EMERGENCY SERVICE |
| | TO THE MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER BUILDING? PROVIDE A |
| | TURNING RADIUS DRAWING VERIFYING THAT FIRE RESCUE |
| | VEHICLES, INCLUDING AMBULANCES, CAN ACCESS THE BUILDING |
| | VIA THE DRIVEWAY. SEE THE COMMENTS ISSUED BY THE FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE ACCESS TO THE BUILDING. THE |
| | ACCESS ISSUE NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 4) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE SITE PLAN SHOWS |
| | A 20 FOOT WIDE STABILIZED FIRE TRUCK ACCESS ROAD, YET |
| | THE DETAIL ON SHEET C8.03 SHOWS ONE DETAIL WITH A 12 |
| | FOOT WIDTH AND A DIFFERENT DETAIL WITH A 15 FOOT WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 5) PARTIAL REPEAT: THE BUFFER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DIMENSIONS USED TO CALCULATE THE |
| | BUFFERS SHALL MATCH THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | A. THE NORTH BUFFER SHALL USE THE SURVEY DIMENSION |
| | LENGTH OF 463 FEET. THIS WILL REQUIRE 16 TREES - 16 |
| | TREES ARE PROVIDED. |
| | B. THE SOUTH BUFFER SHALL USE THE SURVEY DIMENSION |
| | LENGTH OF 585 FEET. THIS WILL REQUIRE 20 TREES - 19 |
| | TREES LISTED AS PROVIDED. STAFF RECOMMENDS A MEETING |
| | WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THE TREE COUNT, |
| | AS COUNTING TREES/PALMS FROM THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER |
| | INSTEAD ON THE SOUTH BUFFER MAY ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED |
| | TREE COUNT. THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER APPEAR TO EXCEED |
| | THE COUNTS. |
| | C. THE WEST BUFFER SHALL LIST THAT PALM TREES ARE |
| | COUNTED AT A 2:1 RATIO AS TREES. |
| | |
| | 6) PARTIAL REPEAT: PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE 89 PROVIDED |
| | SHADE TREES WERE CALCULATED. THE PLANT SCHEDULE ONLY |
| | SHOWS 73 SHADE TREES. IF THE PALM SUBSTITUTION IS BEING |
| | USED (2:1) THEN PLEASE ANNOTATE THIS IN THE LANDSCAPE |
| | TABULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 7) PARTIAL REPEAT: HOW WILL TRASH PICK-UP FOR THE |
| | BUILDING BE PROVIDED? PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM |
| | FERDINAND RIVERA-NEGRON, CITY SANITATION, APPROVING THE |
| | FPL PROPOSED TRASH PICK-UP PLAN OUTLINED IN THE E-MAIL |
| | TO PLANNING ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2014. HOW WILL RECYCLING |
| | BE ACHIEVED? |
| | |
| | 8) NEW COMMENT: THE DETAILS FOR THE FENCE, GATES AND |
| | COLUMNS ALONG NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SHOW THESE FEATURES |
| | TALLER THAN SIX (6) FEET. THE FENCE AND GATES ARE SHOWN |
| | WITH A SETBACK OF 25 FEET AND THE COLUMNS ARE SHOWN |
| | WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 24 FOOT SETBACK. THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS LIMIT FENCES IN |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS TO FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT |
| | WITHIN THE 25 FOOT FRONT SETBACK. IN ORDER TO HAVE THE |
| | FENCE, GATES AND COLUMNS AS SHOWN, THEY NEED TO BE |
| | FULLY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 25 FOOT FRONT SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 9) NEW COMMENT: THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS ONLY PERMIT A 20 SQUARE FOOT SIGN FOR THIS |
| | SITE. THE SIGN DETAIL SHOWS A SIGN THAT IS LARGER THAN |
| | 20 SQUARE FEET. |
| | |
| | 10) NEW COMMENT: THE BICYCLE RACKS THEMSELVES MEET CITY |
| | STANDARDS, HOWEVER; THE PLACEMENT OF THE RACKS ON THE |
| | PAD IN A LINEAR PATTERN DOES NOT SEEM TO PROVIDE |
| | FUNCTIONING BICYCLE PARKING. STAFF SUGGESTS USING THE |
| | ?HEAD IN? PARKING, AS SHOWN PREVIOUSLY. THIS REQUIRES A |
| | MINIMUM PAD DEPTH OF SIX (6) FEET. THE DIMENSIONS OF |
| | THE BICYCLE PAD, INCLUDING THE BICYCLE RACKS, ARE |
| | REQUIRED ON A DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 11) NEW COMMENT: THE PARKING SPACE DETAILS THAT HAVE |
| | BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFORM TO CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH STANDARDS. THE CITY REQUIRES DOUBLE |
| | STRIPING FOR THE PARKING SPACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | STALL PAINTING DETAIL FOUND IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 12) NEW COMMENT: THE MOUNTING HEIGHT ON THE PHOTOMETRIC |
| | PLAN LISTS THE SLC MOUNTING HEIGHT AT 14 FEET WHILE THE |
| | DETAILS SHEET SHOWS THEM AT 12 FEET. THIS WILL NEED TO |
| | BE CORRECTED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| |
Print |
