| Date |
Text |
| 2014-11-12 13:37:21 | PB 950PPPP - OCTOBER 3, 2014 RESUBMITTAL |
| | CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL AND GARAGE MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | 600 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. AND 900 FLORIDA AVE. |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 12, 2015), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE MINOR AMENDMENT (MA) AND THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT (BP) HAVE DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR |
| | THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS WITHIN THE HOTEL LISTED BELOW. THE |
| | PLANS SHALL MATCH. IF THE MA IS CORRECT, THEN A |
| | REVISION IS REQUIRED FOR THE BP PLANS. |
| | |
| | A. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: HOTEL SITE: MA - 29,451 SQ. FT. |
| | BP - 33,250 SQ. FT. |
| | B. PUBLIC AREA PARKING SQ. FT.: MA - 40,451 SQ. FT. BP |
| | 42,024 SQ. FT. |
| | C. PARKING PROVIDED: MA - 447 SPACES BP - 420 SPACES |
| | |
| | 2) CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS |
| | (PREFERABLY INCLUDING GARAGE EXAMPLE PHOTOS) OF THE |
| | CABLE GUARDRAILS WITH FABRIC SCREEN. THE CABLE |
| | GUARDRAILS WITH FABRIC SCREEN SHALL PROVIDE EQUAL OR |
| | BETTER SHIELDING OF THE CAR HEADLIGHTS THAN A MASONRY |
| | WALL. |
| | |
| | 3) THE REMOVAL OF A BENCH ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | GARAGE HAS SATISFIED THE PASSING ZONE REQUIREMENT. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE THE OTHER BENCH (AND TRASH CAN) FROM THE |
| | PLANS AS WELL. THESE DO NOT SERVE A PURPOSE AS THIS |
| | WILL NOT BE A HIGH PEDESTRIAN AREA SINCE IT IS ONLY A |
| | THREE (3) FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK AND THE SIDEWALK HAS NO |
| | DESTINATION. ADDITIONALLY, IF SOMEONE IS SITTING ON THE |
| | BENCH, THEIR LEGS HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF BLOCKING THE |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 4) CONDITION OF APPROVAL: AS PART OF THE GARAGE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT, PROVIDE DETAILS (PREFERABLY INCLUDING |
| | GARAGE EXAMPLE PHOTOS) OF THE CABLE GUARDRAILS WITH |
| | FABRIC SCREEN. THE CABLE GUARDRAILS WITH FABRIC SCREEN |
| | SHALL PROVIDE EQUAL OR BETTER SHIELDING OF THE CAR |
| | HEADLIGHTS THAN A MASONRY WALL. IF THE CABLE GUARDRAILS |
| | WITH FABRIC SCREENS ARE NOT APPROVED AS PART OF THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT, THEN THE WALLS SHALL BE A SOLID |
| | MASONRY MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 5) CONDITION OF APPROVAL: STAFF HAS REEVALUATED THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST |
| | CORNER OF THE GARAGE. SINCE THESE BICYCLE RACKS WILL |
| | MOST LIKELY BE USED BY EMPLOYEES, THESE SHALL BE PLACED |
| | INSIDE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE GARAGE (ADJACENT TO |
| | VALET SPACE 41, ORIENTED THE SAME DIRECTION AS PARKING |
| | SPACE 41). THIS WILL PROVIDE SPACES THAT ARE COVERED |
| | FROM THE ELEMENTS, IN LINE WITH THE DOWNTOWN MASTER |
| | PLAN STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | SPECIAL EVENT VALET PARKING |
| | |
| | 6) REVISED COMMENT: WHEEL STOPS ARE REQUIRED TO PROTECT |
| | THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE CANOPY SUPPORT POSTS, AND |
| | MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SUCH AS DRAIN PIPES, AND ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED TO SEPARATE THE HEAD TO HEAD PARKING SPACES. |
| | THE REVISED PLAN SHOWS ALL THE WHEEL STOPS REMOVED, |
| | INCLUDING THE ONES REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE BUILDING, |
| | INCLUDING THE CANOPY SUPPORT POSTS, AND MECHANICAL |
| | SYSTEMS, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE PARKING |
| | SPACES CAUSES MULTIPLE UNUSABLE SPACES. STAFF HAS |
| | LISTED EXAMPLES BELOW. THE COMPLETE LAYOUT SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED TO VERIFY NO PROBLEMS. STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT |
| | THE LOCATIONS THAT REQUIRE MORE THAN TWO CARS TO BE |
| | MOVED TO RETRIEVE THE PARKED CAR. THERE ARE SPACES ON |
| | THE SECOND FLOOR THAT REQUIRE AS MANY AS SIX CARS TO BE |
| | MOVED TO REACH THE OBJECT CAR. THESE "MOVED" CARS WILL |
| | THEN IMPEDE THE RETRIEVAL OF OTHER CARS. |
| | |
| | A. PARKING SPACES 602-610 AND 613-615 DO NOT FUNCTION |
| | AS THEY ARE BLOCKED ON EITHER END BY THE CANOPY SUPPORT |
| | POSTS. |
| | |
| | B. THE PARALLEL SPACES AT THE END OF EACH ROW LOOK VERY |
| | DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO PARK IN. |
| | |
| | LIGHTING |
| | |
| | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF |
| | THE HOTEL IS BEING REMOVED AND RECONSTRUCTED AS PART OF |
| | THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT. AS PART OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF |
| | THE SIDEWALK AND INSTALLATION LANDSCAPE, THE EXISTING |
| | LIGHT POLES SHALL BE REPLACED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE |
| | LIGHT POLES APPROVED AS PART OF THIS MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | FOR THE BALANCE OF THE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 9) CONDITION: AS PART OF THE GARAGE BUILDING PERMIT, |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE FIXTURES MOUNTED TO THE |
| | UNDERSIDE OF THE CANOPY TENTS. THE FIXTURES MOUNTED TO |
| | THE UNDERSIDE OF THE CANOPY TENTS SHALL INCLUDE A |
| | METHOD TO KEEP LIGHT GLARE FROM SPILLING ONTO THE |
| | ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL TOWER. |
| | |
| |
Print |
