| Date |
Text |
| 2014-03-12 10:32:17 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 3/5/14 |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL NEEDS TO BE UPDATED (GRAPHIC |
| | WILL BE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE). |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC. |
| | 94-485(Q). |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE LOADING AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC. |
| | 94-485(P). |
| | |
| | 4. INCLUDE PARKING CALCULATION FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE |
| | SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5. THE LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION ON SHEET SP1.0 APPEARS |
| | TO BE THE LOT SIZE RATHER THAN LOT COVERAGE |
| | CALCULATION. PLEASE VERIFY. |
| | |
| | 6. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 7. MINIMUM HEIGHT OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WALL IS SIX (6) |
| | FEET (ZLDR SEC. 94-444(B) FIGURE XIV-3). PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | PROPOSED HEIGHT OF DUMPSTER ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE CLARIFY LEASE AREA VERSUS PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE CLARIFY THE EASTERN SIDEWALK LOCATION. IT |
| | APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE THE LEASE AREA. |
| | |
| | 10. THERE IS A SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACES PROVIDING A CONNECTION TO THE |
| | SOUTH. THIS CONNECTION IS ONLY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | (SP1.0) AND NOT CARRIED THROUGH TO THE OTHER SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 11. HOW WILL PEDESTRIANS USING THE SIDEWALK AROUND THE |
| | ROUNDABOUT BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICLES IN THE |
| | ROUNDABOUT? IS THE SIDEWALK RAISED? |
| | |
| | 12. THE SIDEWALK ALIGNMENT IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON |
| | THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROUNDABOUT IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, A FIRE HYDRANT IS BEING PROPOSED ON THE |
| | UTILITY PLAN WITHIN THIS LANDSCAPE ISLAND WHICH WILL |
| | AFFECT THE PROPOSED PLANTINGS. |
| | |
| | 13. WILL THERE BE ANY OTHER OUTDOOR MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT OR UTILITIES IN ADDITION TO THE GENERATOR AND |
| | TRANSFORMER SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUCH AS POOL |
| | EQUIPMENT, AIR CONDITIONING UNITS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS? |
| | IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE AND PROVIDE PROPER SCREENING. |
| | ADDITIONAL SCREENING SHOULD ALSO BE PROPOSED AROUND THE |
| | TRANSFORMER. |
| | |
| | 14. WHAT IS THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROPOSED FOR THE |
| | ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW DRIVEWAYS ON THE PLAN? HAS ANY |
| | CONSIDERATION BEEN MADE FOR THE TRAFFIC FLOW WITH THE |
| | FUTURE ENTRY ROAD ON THE MASTER PLAN? |
| | |
| | 15. SITE PLAN INDICATES THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN |
| | TO BE RELOCATED. PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE PLAN WHERE |
| | THE FREESTANDING SIGN WILL BE RELOCATED TO SO IT CAN BE |
| | ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. IF A NEW |
| | FREESTANDING SIGN WILL BE CONSTRUCTED RATHER THAN |
| | RELOCATED, COMPLIANCE WITH THE ST. MARY'S CSPD MASTER |
| | SIGNAGE PROGRAM WILL NEED TO BE DEMONSTRATED. |
| | A NEW 3' X 2' DIRECTIONAL PARKING SIGN IS BEING |
| | PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SITE. ADDITIONAL |
| | DESIGN INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON THIS SIGN TO EVALUATE |
| | CONSISTENCY OF THIS SIGN WITH THE MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN |
| | FOR ST. MARY'S CSPD. |
| | |
| | 16. PLEASE REVIEW LIGHTING GUIDELINES OF THE ST. MARY'S |
| | CSPD AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OR NOTATE WHERE THE PLAN DEVIATES FROM THE GUIDELINES. |
| | IT WILL BE IMPORTANT THAT THE PROPOSED LIGHTING |
| | FIXTURES ARE AESTHETICALLY COMPATIBLE WITH WHAT IS |
| | EXISTING ON THE ST. MARY'S CAMPUS. |
| | |
| | 17. TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WAS RECEIVED BUT IT ONLY |
| | CONTAINED A LIST OF TREES TO BE REMOVED. A SITE PLAN |
| | INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE TREES TO BE REMOVED AND |
| | CALCULATION FOR REPLACEMENT WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED |
| | PER ZLDR SEC. 94-448. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPING: |
| | |
| | 18. 75% OF REQUIRED TREES ARE TO BE SHADE TREES. SHEET |
| | 1 OF 2 OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATES ONLY 63% IS |
| | PROVIDED. IS THERE A REASON THE 75% CANNOT BE MET? |
| | |
| | 19. THE DESIGN GUIDELINES (SECTION 2(G)) FOR THE ST. |
| | MARY'S CSPD REQUIRE THAT A MINIMUM OF 75% OF THE TREES |
| | AND PALMS REQUIRED BY CODE AND THE GUIDELINES BE NATIVE |
| | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. SIMILARLY A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE |
| | SHRUBS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED SHALL BE NATIVE TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 20. LOCATION OF UTILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT THE PLANTINGS |
| | SHOULD BE DEPICTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES |
| | BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO LOCATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE |
| | EASEMENTS, OVERHEAD LINES, WATER METERS, TRANSFORMERS |
| | CHECK VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, FIRE HYDRANTS, LIGHT POLES, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 21. THE DIVIDER MEDIAN LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE WESTERN |
| | SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' IN |
| | WIDTH EXCLUDING THE CURBING. |
| | |
| | 22. PLEASE REVIEW AND VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 6(D) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE ST. |
| | MARY'S CSPD REGARDING PLANT HEIGHT, CLEAR TRUNK, AND |
| | SPREAD REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS FOR RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY |
| | DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | B. 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE REDUCED COPY AND AN ELECTRONIC |
| | COPY OF ALL PLANS. YOU MAY VERIFY PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL |
| | IF A REDUCED NUMBER PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
