| Date |
Text |
| 2014-02-04 16:54:19 | CASE NO. PB 1446CC |
| | OAKTON COMMONS CPD - RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL |
| | 8151 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY APRIL 5, 2014), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OF THE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS WERE NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED SO YOU WILL BE |
| | ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE A PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC |
| | CONCURRENCY LETTER APPROVING THE CONVERSION OF USE. THE |
| | LETTER THAT WAS SUBMITTED INCLUDED COMMENTS THAT STILL |
| | NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2) NEW COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD IS SHOWN AT 17 FEET |
| | WIDE FOR 6 BICYCLE RACKS. BASED ON THE INSTALLATION |
| | STANDARDS, THE BICYCLE PAD FOR 6 BICYCLE RACKS IS ONLY |
| | REQUIRED TO BE 16.5 FEET WIDE. WHILE THE PAD IS SHOWN |
| | WIDE ENOUGH, STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE RACK CLOSEST |
| | TO THE WALL IS INSTALLED WITH THE ADEQUATE MINIMUM |
| | SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DISTANCE FOR THE FIRST |
| | ELEMENT FROM THE WALL, EITHER 2 FEET OR 2.5 FEET (16.5 |
| | FOOT WIDE PAD OR 17 FOOT WIDE PAD, RESPECTIVELY). |
| | |
| | 3) NEW COMMENT: THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THAT THE |
| | SIGNALIZED EXIT ONTO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD WILL HAVE |
| | THREE LANES. THE SITE PLAN ONLY SHOWS THE EXISTING TWO |
| | LANE CONDITION. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 4) REVISED COMMENT: THE FDOT PRE-APPLICATION LETTER |
| | INCLUDES A CONDITION THAT A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED |
| | TO DETERMINE IF THE LEFT TURN LANE AT BENOIST FARMS |
| | ROAD IS REQUIRED TO BE LENGTHENED. WHAT IS THE STATUS |
| | OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY? |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A WRITTEN NARRATIVE |
| | VERIFYING HOW THE BUILDING MEETS THE DESIGN ELEMENTS |
| | FROM MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | A. THE REQUIREMENT IS THAT 50% OF EACH FACADE HAVE A |
| | SLOPED ROOF. THE EAST AND WEST FACADES ARE 122.67 FEET |
| | LONG WITH THE SLOPED ROOF SECTION 33 FEET LONG, WHICH |
| | IS ONLY 30%. |
| | |
| | 6) NEW COMMENT: THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | PRIMARY ENTRANCE ROAD HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PLANS. |
| | THIS SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED BY THE ROAD MATRIX IN THE |
| | DESIGN GUIDELINES. IT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE |
| | COMPLETION OF PHASE III. THE ROAD MATRIX REQUIRES THAT |
| | THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE DRIVE HAVE A FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE |
| | SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES. THIS IS NOT SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 7) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE CODE |
| | COMPLIANT BUFFER MATERIAL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN TRACTS |
| | C-2 REPLAT AND TRACTS B, C-1 AND OAKTON PRESERVE |
| | (EXCLUDING THE TREE PRESERVE AREA). |
| | |
| | A. THERE IS ONE TREE REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTHERN |
| | PROPERTY LINE WHERE OAKTON PRESERVE EXTENDS SOUTH OF |
| | THE TRACT C-2/PRESERVE BOUNDARY. |
| | B. THERE IS ONE ADDITIONAL TREE REQUIRED ALONG THE |
| | EASTERN PROPERTY LINE OF TRACT C-2. STAFF IS DOUBLE |
| | COUNTING THE FOUNDATION PLANTING TREES AS BUFFER TREES. |
| | |
| | 8) REVISED COMMENT: THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL HAVE |
| | THE COCOPLUM HEDGE WRAP THE SOUTH SIDE TO PROVIDE |
| | SCREENING. |
| | |
| | 9) NEW COMMENT: IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE 2 ALEXANDER |
| | PALMS ON TOP OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH THAT RUNS ALONG |
| | THE WEST SIDE OF THE PLAY AREA. NOTE: ROOT BARRIERS |
| | SHALL BE USED IN ANY AREAS WHERE TREES MAY IMPACT WATER |
| | OR SEWER LINES OR EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. |
| | |
| | 10) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCEPTUAL |
| | APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT FOR THE PROPOSED CIRCULATION |
| | PLAN (NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD). FDOT |
| | HAS NOT APPROVED THE PLAN AS OF THE MEETING ON FEBRUARY |
| | 4, 2014. |
| | |
| | 11) NEW COMMENT: STAFF DISCUSSED THE CONNECTION OF THE |
| | COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL CONNECTOR PATH WITH MIKE SMOLAK |
| | WITH THE OAKTON PRESERVE DEVELOPER. HE INDICATED THAT |
| | THERE IS A LARGE DROP-OFF FROM THE FINISHED GRADE OF |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY TO THE EXISTING GRADE OF THE |
| | TREE PRESERVE AT THE BORDER OF THE 2 PROPERTIES. HE WAS |
| | NOT SURE THAT AN ADA COMPLIANT SIDEWALK MADE OF |
| | CONCRETE OR PAVERS WOULD BE EASILY ACHIEVED (POSSIBLE |
| | REQUIREMENT OF FILL AND/OR RETAINING WALL). THE OAKTON |
| | PRESERVE DEVELOPER EXPERIENCED SIMILAR ISSUES WITH |
| | THEIR PORTION OF THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK NETWORK WHERE IT |
| | IS ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PRESERVE |
| | TRACT AND THEY DETERMINED THAT THE BEST OPTION WAS TO |
| | INSTALL AN ELEVATED BOARDWALK TO ACCOUNT FOR THE GRADE |
| | CHANGE. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANS TO INCLUDE "BOARDWALK" |
| | AS A POSSIBLE PATH TYPE IN CASE THIS BECOMES THE |
| | PREFERRED PATH OPTION FOR PART OR ALL OF THE CONNECTOR |
| | PATH. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
