| Date |
Text |
| 2014-01-08 12:55:29 | CASE NO. PB 1446CC |
| | OAKTON COMMONS CPD - RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL |
| | 8151 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (MARCH 7, 2014), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300). |
| | |
| | 1) THE REVISED PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | LETTER APPROVING THE CONVERSION OF USE IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FDOT ROW PERMIT FOR THE NEW |
| | DRIVEWAY CONNECTION. |
| | |
| | 3) THE FPU, FPL AND CITY SERVICE LETTERS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4) THE SCHOOL IS PROPOSED TO HAVE BOTH ELEMENTARY AND |
| | MIDDLE SCHOOL CHILDREN; THEREFORE, THE REQUIRED SPACE |
| | CALCULATION SHALL INCLUDE BOTH THE ELEMENTARY 5 |
| | VISITORS AND THE MIDDLE SCHOOL 10 VISITORS. THE TOTAL |
| | NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED IS 75 SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5) FOR CLARITY PURPOSES, PLEASE PUT (159 PLUS 8 |
| | TRANSIENT SPACES) NEXT TO THE 167 REQUIRED NUMBER AND |
| | (196 PLUS 8 TRANSIENT SPACES) NEXT TO THE 204 PROVIDED |
| | SPACES. |
| | |
| | 6) PER THE OAKTON COMMONS DESIGN GUIDELINES, NO |
| | OVERNIGHT BUS PARKING IS PERMITTED ON-SITE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLAN VIEW OF THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE APPROVED ELEVATION VIEW STYLES. THE PROPOSED |
| | BICYCLE PARKING TABLE STATES THAT THERE WILL BE 6 |
| | SPACES ON ONE RACK, WHICH WILL NOT WORK WITH THE |
| | APPROVED STYLES - REMEMBER THE WAVE STYLE RACK IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED IN WEST PALM BEACH. WHILE STAFF COMMENDS THE |
| | APPLICANT FOR PROPOSING 12 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES, THE |
| | SITE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXPANSION OF |
| | THE NUMBER OF SPACES IF IT BECOMES EVIDENT THAT THERE |
| | IS A GREATER DEMAND THAN 12 SPACES. |
| | |
| | 8) THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING SHALL BE RELOCATED TO BE NEXT TO THE SPACES ON |
| | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IN ORDER TO BE LOCATED |
| | CLOSE TO THE PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING, IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PARCEL B PROVIDED BICYCLE RACK NOTE SHOULD STATE |
| | 4 SPACES ON 2 RACKS. |
| | |
| | 10) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE BOARDWALK CONFIGURATION IN |
| | THE PRESERVE THAT WAS PROPOSED BY THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPER BUT DENIED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. PLEASE |
| | SHOW CORRECT DETAILS AND A REVISED TIE IN TO THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 11) CONSTRUCT NORTHERN SIDEWALK AT 5 FEET IN WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 12) PROVIDE A WRITTEN NARRATIVE VERIFYING HOW THE |
| | BUILDING MEETS THE DESIGN ELEMENTS FROM MASTER DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES? |
| | |
| | 13) PROVIDE LINE OF SIGHT DRAWING FROM THE EAST |
| | PROPERTY LINE OF THE BENOIST FARMS ENTRY DRIVEWAY, NOT |
| | THE PARCEL BOUNDARY TO VERIFY THAT THE ROOFTOP |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED FROM THE EAST.. |
| | |
| | 14) THE DESCRIPTIVE TAGS FOR THE TREES LAYER DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN TURNED ON FOR THE PAPER COPY PRINT. |
| | |
| | 15) PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC DETAILS FOR THE TRACT P 10 |
| | FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREA AND THE APPROVAL OF THE |
| | PLANTING PLAN BY THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE |
| | MANAGER. THE GENERIC CROSS SECTION DRAWING ON SHEET |
| | LP-3 IS NO LONGER SUFFICIENT. |
| | |
| | 16) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BUFFER ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | IS 620 FEET, WHICH REQUIRES 16 TREES NOT 15 AS STATED |
| | ON THE PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF THE PRESERVED |
| | TREES WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER ON THE PLAN SO |
| | THAT STAFF MAY VERIFY THE 16 BUFFER TREES HAVE BEEN |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 17) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE CODE COMPLIANT BUFFER |
| | MATERIAL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN TRACTS C-2 REPLAT AND |
| | TRACTS B, C-1 AND OAKTON PRESERVE (EXCLUDING THE TREE |
| | PRESERVE AREA). |
| | |
| | 18) THE RELOCATION OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OFF OF TRACT B |
| | WILL REQUIRE VERIFICATION THAT TRACK B STILL MEETS |
| | MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | PLANS SHOW THE TERMINAL ISLAND TREE REMAINING AT THE |
| | WEST END OF TRACT B, BUT THE TEXT SAYS THE LANDSCAPE |
| | MATERIAL WILL BE RELOCATED. THE TERMINAL TREE MAY NOT |
| | BE RELOCATED. |
| | |
| | 19) PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE LIGUSTRUM TREES ARE |
| | SPECIFIED AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT WHEN THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES REQUIRE 14 FOOT HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 20) PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 21) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 95 FOOT GAP IN TREES |
| | ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. THIS GAP IS TOO LARGE TO |
| | JUSTIFY IMPROVED AESTHETICS. |
| | |
| | 22) A SOLITARY ALEXANDER PALM MAY NOT COUNT AS A |
| | TERMINAL ISLAND TREE (ADA SPACES NORTH OF BUILDING). |
| | |
| | 23) THE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, FIRE HYDRANTS AND |
| | TRANSFORMERS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 24) HE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS SHALL EXTEND TO THE |
| | PROPERTY COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINES |
| | AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. |
| | |
| | 25) THERE SHALL BE PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING INSTALLED |
| | ALONG THE PATH TO THE RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSES. |
| | |
| | 26) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES. |
| | |
| | 27) PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW PARENTS SHOWING UP BETWEEN THE |
| | TWO DROP OFF TIMES ARE HANDLED. AT THE SITE ON SUMMIT |
| | BOULEVARD, STAFF OBSERVED PARENTS DROPPING CHILDREN OFF |
| | IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL WITH THE QUEUE LINE BLOCKED WITH |
| | CONES AND NO SCHOOL PERSONNEL MONITORING THE SITUATION |
| | BETWEEN DROP OFF TIMES. THIS IS NOT EXPLAINED IN THE |
| | OPERATIONAL PLAN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 28) PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL LETTER FROM |
| | FDOT FOR THE PROPOSED CIRCULATION PLAN (NO NEGATIVE |
| | IMPACT TO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD). |
| | |
| | 29) WHAT HAPPENS IF A PERSON MISSES THE MIDDLE ENTRANCE |
| | FOR DROP OFF/PICK UP? |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO |
| | ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
