| Date |
Text |
| 2014-05-28 17:46:42 | ZONING COMMENTS |
| | |
| | *PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | *WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8 ? BY 11), AND AN |
| | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | *PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% ($200) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) EVIDENCE (I.E. WRITTEN STATEMENT) THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS ON 45TH STREET HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE |
| | COUNTY AND THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH THE DESIGN AND THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINT. |
| | |
| | 2.) EVIDENCE (I.E. WRITTEN STATEMENT) THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS ON MILITARY TRAIL HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY |
| | FDOT AND THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH THE DESIGN AND THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE ACCESS POINT. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE HANDICAP PARKING STALL DETAIL IN SHEET C1.A |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARDS. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | (SEE ATTACHED DETAIL) |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE RACK IN SHEET C1.A. |
| | |
| | 3.) THERE ARE TWO (2) DUMPSTER DETAILS IN SHEET C1.A. |
| | DETAIL 8 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS PROVIDED IN |
| | ZLDR S.94-444, FIGURE XIV-3. PLEASE ADDRESS IN SHEETS |
| | C1.0 (KEYNOTES) AND SHEET C1.A. |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES IN |
| | SHEET C1.0. DO THE FIXTURES PROJECT 3 FT. FROM THE WALL |
| | (AS MEASURED IN THE SITE PLAN)? A NOTATION IN THE |
| | KEYNOTES WOULD BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5.) WILL THE PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING |
| | HAVE WHEEL STOPS OR WILL THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BE |
| | CURBED TO PREVENT VEHICULAR ACCESS? PLEASE CLARIFY AND |
| | ILLUSTRATE. |
| | |
| | 6.) IDENTIFY THE CORRECT LOCATION OF THE PROJECT IN THE |
| | VICINITY MAP IN SHEET C1.0 |
| | |
| | 7.) PLEASE CORRECT THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR: BUILDING HEIGHT PROVIDED = 23?, LOADING SPACE: |
| | MINIMUM AND PROVIDED = 10? X 25?. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE TRANSFORMER, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | PROPERTY, SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR |
| | S.94-444(B)). PLEASE ADDRESS AND PROVIDE A DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES IN SHEET L1.0 ARE NOT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR S.94-305(E). (SEE ATTACHED DETAIL) |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE LIGHTING NOTES (SHEET P1.0) REFERENCES THE CITY |
| | OF NORTH LAUDERDALE?S LIGHTING STANDARDS. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. (REPEAT COMMENT) |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE SIGN AREA SHALL BE CALCULATED AS THE AREA WITH |
| | THE SMALLEST RECTANGLE THAT ENCOMPASSES ALL ELEMENTS OF |
| | THE SIGN. (ZLDR S.94-405) |
| | |
| | 2.) THE SCALE SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
