| Date |
Text |
| 2014-09-05 14:27:49 | CASE NO. PB 891Z - 1ST RESUBMITTAL |
| | PB OUTLETS - AS BUILT REVISIONS |
| | 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 5, 2014), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE ADDITIONAL |
| | (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: MULTIPLE PARKING ROWS DO NOT SHOW |
| | THE CORRECT PARKING COUNT TAG. |
| | |
| | 2) THE FOLLOWING DIFFERENCES WERE NOTED BETWEEN THE |
| | LATEST UDKS SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND |
| | ELEVATION SUBMITTALS AND THE LATEST BUILDING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTALS FOR THE LISTED BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | A. BUILDING A: |
| | |
| | 1. THE REAR ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT DO NOT MATCH THE LATEST SHELL PERMIT |
| | ELEVATION (AWNINGS HAVE BEEN CHANGED). PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | THE LATEST VERSION OF THE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | B. BUILDING B1: |
| | |
| | 1. THE SIDEWALK BEHIND TENANT B14 DOES NOT LINE UP WITH |
| | THE DOOR ON THE UDKS SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2. THE LATEST BUILDING REVISION LISTS TENANT B13 WITH |
| | AN ADDITIONAL ONE (1) SQ. FT. TO ITS BUILDING SIZE. |
| | SUBMIT CORRECTED ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS. THE UDKS |
| | SITE PLAN AND DATE TABLES MATCH THE CORRECT BUILDING |
| | PERMIT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 87,837 SQ. FT. |
| | |
| | C. BUILDING B2: |
| | |
| | 1. THE LATEST BUILDING PERMIT REVISION FOR BUILDING B2 |
| | SHOWS THE BUILDING HAVING 59,727 SQ. FT. INSTEAD OF THE |
| | 59,738 SQ. FT. LISTED ON THE UDKS SITE PLAN AND DATA |
| | TABLE. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE NUMBERS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | SITE PLAN SEEM TO MATCH THE BUILDING PERMIT SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE VERIFY THE REAR LAYOUT OF BUILDING B2. THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT REVISION SEEMS TO SOME CHANGES AROUND |
| | THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES WHEN COMPARED TO THE UDKS SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | D. BUILDING E: |
| | |
| | 1. WHY IS THE STARBUCKS DRIVE THRU CURVE EXPANDED TO 20 |
| | FEET FROM THE CURRENT APPROVED 15 FOOT WIDTH? |
| | |
| | 2. THE DRIVE THRU DETAIL SHOWS THE ENTRY PORTION OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY WITH AN 11 FOOT DIMENSION LINE. THIS LINE DOES |
| | NOT EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANE. PLEASE SHOW THE |
| | TAG FOR THE FULL WIDTH AT 12 FEET. IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| | DRIVE THRU LANE WAS WIDENED AT THIS POINT SINCE THE |
| | PREVIOUS APPROVED VERSION AND THE TAG WAS NOT UPDATED. |
| | |
| | 3. THE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE LATEST SHELL PERMIT ELEVATION. PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | E. BUILDING F: |
| | |
| | 1. THE SIGN POSTS FOR THE ADA AND PICK UP PARKING |
| | SPACES HAVE BEEN MOVED OUT OF THE PARKING SPACES AND |
| | BEHIND THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE CORRECT ON THE SITE AND |
| | PROVIDE THE LATEST LANDSCAPE PLAN WHICH SHOWS THIS |
| | CHANGE. |
| | |
| | F. BUILDING H: |
| | |
| | 1. THE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE LATEST SHELL PERMIT ELEVATION |
| | (MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO INCLUDE FUTURE DOOR FRAMING). |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 2. THE UPDATED FLOOR PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 3. THE NEW GROUND MOUNTED AC UNIT SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN AND PROPERLY SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4. REPEAT COMMENT: THE UDKS SITE PLAN SHOWS DIFFERENT |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE THAN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN/BUILDING |
| | PERMIT FOR BUILDING H. THE BUILDING PERMIT STATES THE |
| | BUILDING SIZE OF 7,700 SQ. FT. THIS SHALL BE REFLECTED |
| | ON THE UDKS SITE PLAN AND SITE PLAN DATA TABLES FOR |
| | THIS BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND LINE-OF-SITE |
| | DRAWING FOR ANY BUILDINGS WHICH HAVE BEEN REVISED. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LAST SUBMITTAL DOES NOT SEEM TO |
| | HAVE INCLUDED THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDINGS |
| | A, B1, B2, C, E, G AND H. PLEASE INCLUDE THESE WITH THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 4) ADD NEW FENCES AROUND THE CANAL AND LIFT STATION. |
| | |
| | 5) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT SHALL NOT HAVE THE "UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT" |
| | LAYER TURNED ON. THIS WILL BE THE OVERALL APPROVED |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE VERIFY THAT ALL DATA IS UP TO DATE ON THE |
| | MASTER PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PAGES OF THE SIGN PROGRAM SHALL BE UPDATED AS |
| | NEEDED TO REFLECT THE REDESIGNED FREE STANDING SIGNS |
| | FOR THE MARKETPLACE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE NEW STEPPING STONE PATH SHOWN ON SHEET FSP-3 IS |
| | NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 9) THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE |
| | THAT WERE SHIFTED OUT OF THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS DUE TO |
| | THE UNDERGROUND PIPE APPEAR TO BE VERY CLOSE TO THE |
| | PARKING LOT LIGHTS (SHEET LP-2). PLEASE VERIFY THAT |
| | THAT THERE IS ADEQUATE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TREES AND |
| | THE LIGHTS THAT AS THE TREES GROW, THEY WILL NOT NEED |
| | TO BE NEGATIVELY CUT BACK TO ACCOMMODATE THE PARKING |
| | LOT LIGHTING. |
| | |
| | 10) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE |
| | SITE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND |
| | NO LONGER HAS TREES EVERY 30 FEET AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. - NOTE: THIS |
| | HAS BEEN CORRECTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED AS |
| | PART OF THE PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE PERMIT. PLEASE RESUBMIT |
| | THE MOST RECENT LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11) WHAT IS WITHIN THE FENCED ENCLOSURE IN THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHEET LP-6? IF IT IS ABOVEGROUND |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, IT SHALL BE SCREENED. PLEASE |
| | REMEMBER THAT CHAIN LINK FENCING IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE PAVED DRIVE TO THE |
| | ENCLOSURE IS LABELED "SOD". - NOTE: THIS HAS BEEN |
| | CORRECTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED AS PART OF |
| | THE PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE PERMIT. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE MOST |
| | RECENT LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 12) THE RECENTLY SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE CIVIL |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PARKING LOT STRIPING |
| | SHOW A CONCRETE PAD FOR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AT THE |
| | VERY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. THIS IS NOT |
| | REFLECTED ON THE UDKS SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 13) THERE IS A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE BEHIND BAY B-4 THAT |
| | DOES NOT CONTAIN A HEDGE ALONG THE ENCLOSURE WALLS. IF |
| | THE AREA ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE IS TOO NARROW |
| | TO INSTALL A HEDGE, USE VINES ON THE WALL, SUCH AS |
| | FICUS REPENS, OR THE BOUGAINVILLEA OR CONFEDERATE |
| | JASMINE MOUNTED TO WALL GRIDS, AS USED ELSEWHERE ON THE |
| | SITE. THE PROPOSED BOLLARDS MAY CONTINUE TO SERVE AS |
| | THE BARRIER TO PROTECT FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT OF |
| | THE LANDSCAPE AREA. |
| | |
| |
Print |
