| Date |
Text |
| 2013-12-10 16:30:20 | 1. PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST WILL REQUIRE PLANNING |
| | BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 2.COMPLIANCE WITH CC-2 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: |
| | A. A WAVER FROM THE MINIMUM 150' LOT WIDTH WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | B. PROPOSED BUILDING DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | 10' SETBACK REQUIRED FOR ADJOINING PROPERTY LINES |
| | (NORTH SIDE). |
| | C. PROPOSED BUILDING DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | SETBACK ABOVE 40' IN HEIGHT. REQUIRED SETBACK ALONG |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE IS 100' . HOTEL BUILDING IS SETBACK 15' . |
| | D. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED PLAZA AREA. A MINIMUM OF 15% OF TOTAL LOT AREA |
| | IS REQUIRED. PROJECT PROVIDES 1% . |
| | E. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM |
| | OPEN SPACE PAVED CIRCULATION AREA COVERAGE. A MAXIMUM |
| | 15% OF THE LOT AREA CAN BE PAVED CIRCULATION. |
| | F. PLEASE CLARIFY THE PRESENTED NUMBERS FOR PAVED |
| | VEHICULAR AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION, WHAT IS THE |
| | DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO? |
| | G. PROPOSED BUILDINGS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | 10' SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS. |
| | H. PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE CONSIDERED SEPARATE |
| | BUILDINGS, HOWEVER IF THEY ARE NOT SEPARATED THEY DO |
| | NOT COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM N-S MAXIMUM BUILDING WIDTH |
| | OF 120'. |
| | I. SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10' IN WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 3. GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS: |
| | A. PARKING LOT SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5' LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER AROUND THE ENTIRE PARKING. |
| | B. PHOTOMENTRIC PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | C. IS THE FITNESS CENTER OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC OR |
| | IT IS FOR HOTEL GUESTS ONLY? IF IT IS ONLY AN AMENITY |
| | FOR HOTEL GUESTS, PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT |
| | APPLICABLE. |
| | D. PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ARE ENCROACHING INTO THE |
| | PARKING CIRCULATION AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO-TURN TO |
| | CONFIRM MANOUVERING SPACE. |
| | E. BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED ON A RATIO OF 1/20 |
| | PARKING SPACES REQUIRED. |
| | F. A WAIVER FROM THE MINIMU PD AREA WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | G. PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442 OF THE |
| | ZONING CODE REGARDING NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED PER |
| | TOTAL OPEN SPACE.THE TOTAL OPEN SPACE IS ANYTHING THAT |
| | DOES NOT HAVE A BUILDING (37,439SF PROPOSED AS OPEN |
| | SPACE = 23 SHADE TREES REQUIRED; 6 FLOWERING TREES |
| | REQUIRED, 75 SHRUBS). |
| | H. THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS (SEC 94-442(E) ARE NOT |
| | APPLICABLE FOR THIS PROPERTY. |
| | I. A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL AND A LANDSCAPE BUFFER |
| | SHALL BE INSTALL ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY |
| | (NORTH PROPERTY LINE). SEC 94-443(A)- WALL SHALL BE AT |
| | LEAST 5 FEET IN HEIGHT, BUT SHALL BE SETBACK 20' FRONT |
| | THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. BUFFER SHALL INCLUDE 1 TREE |
| | FOR EVERY 30 LINEAR FEET (5 TREES REQUIRED). |
| | J. PARKING LOT INTERIOR ISLANDS AND TERMINAL ISLANDS |
| | SHALL CONTAIN A SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE. |
| | |
| | 4. GENERAL COMMENTS |
| | A. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE FLOOD PLANE |
| | ELEVATION FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING. IS THE PARKING LOT |
| | LEVEL RAISED FROM CURRENT CONDITIONS? PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | SECTION TO DETERMINE ANY IMPACT ON THE RELATIONSHIP |
| | WITH THE PUBLIC REALM ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE, AND THE |
| | BOARDWALK. |
| | B. A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM THE COUNTY WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| | C. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS OF THE DUMPSTERS. |
| | |
| | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA |
| | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
| | |
| |
Print |
