| Date |
Text |
| 2014-06-05 10:22:57 | CASE NO. PB1399O |
| | SEDONA COMMONS BUILDINGS #5/6 AND #7 MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | 8132 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | 2ND RESUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 5, 2014), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED ARCHITECTURAL |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED; |
| | THEREFORE, YOU ARE BEING ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF |
| | $60 (20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE). |
| | |
| | 1) BUILDING #5/6 |
| | |
| | A. THE ELEVATION SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION SUBMITTED WITH THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT - THE WINDOW ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION HAS |
| | BEEN REMOVED ON THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. THIS IS |
| | INTERNAL TO THE SITE, SO STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE |
| | REMOVAL OF THE WINDOW; HOWEVER, ALL PLANS SHALL MATCH. |
| | NOTE: THE FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 5) BUILDING #7 |
| | |
| | A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PREVIOUS MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | APPROVAL FOR BUILDING #7 PERMITTED THE REDUCTION OF THE |
| | CITY COMMISSION APPROVED 9 DOORS TO 3 DOORS ON THE |
| | NORTHERN ELEVATION, PROVIDED THAT WINDOWS ARE PROVIDED |
| | IN THEIR PLACE WHERE THE 6 DOORS HAD BEEN. THE TWO END |
| | BAY LOCATIONS SHALL INCLUDE WINDOWS. THE ELEVATIONS |
| | SHOW WHAT APPEAR TO BE WINDOWS ON THE TWO END BAYS, BUT |
| | WHEN REVIEWING THE STRUCTURAL PLANS INCLUDED WITH THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT AND THE FLOOR PLANS INCLUDED WITH THIS |
| | RESUBMITTAL, THESE LOCATIONS ARE NOT WINDOWS. THEY |
| | APPEAR TO BE STUCCO APPLICATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | SEDONNA COMMONS CPD WAS GRANTED WAIVERS WHEN IT WAS |
| | ORIGINALLY APPROVED. THE WAIVERS WERE BASED ON THE |
| | DESIGN OF THE SITE, WHICH INCLUDED THE BUILDING HAVING |
| | DOORWAYS AND FENESTRATION ON OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD; |
| | THEREFORE, THERE SHALL BE FENESTRATION FOR THE END BAYS |
| | ON THE NORTH FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | B. REPEAT COMMENT: THE THREE DOORS SHALL HAVE A SIMILAR |
| | BANDING AROUND THEM AS THE WINDOWS TO ENHANCE THE |
| | APPEARANCE OF THE DOORWAY ELEMENTS. THIS WILL OFFSET |
| | THE FACT THAT THE DOORWAYS HAVE BEEN NARROWED WITH THE |
| | PROPOSED PLANS WHEN COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER ALIGNING THE DOORS IN A SYMMETRICAL |
| | PATTERN ALONG THE FACADE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| | RESUBMITTAL SHOW THE BANDING AROUND THE DOORS AND |
| | SATISFIES THIS COMMENT. |
| | |
| |
Print |
