| Date |
Text |
| 2013-09-11 11:38:10 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.11.2013 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z13080020 AND Z13080021 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1635C AND C |
| | ADDRESS: 3100-3200 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: JONI BRINKMAN |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. DOES THE EDGE OF WATER OCCUR ALONG THE PERIMTETER OF |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT? ADJACENT TO WHITEHALL, PRESIDENTIAL |
| | ESTATES, ETC. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHERE THE EDGE OF |
| | WATER IS PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 2. PAGES 6, 18 AND 22 OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES INDICATE |
| | THAT THE SURFACE OF THE WATER WILL ONLY BE 80 FEET WIDE |
| | NEAR LOT 50?.I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE LOT 58. |
| | |
| | 3. CORNER LOTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 60 FEET |
| | IN WIDTH, THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN / PLAT SHOWS LOTS THAT |
| | ARE ONLY 55 FEET IN WIDTH. A MODIFICATION OF THIS WILL |
| | REQUIRE A WAIVER FROM THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4. HOW DO YOU ANTICIPATE LOT 89 TO BE CONSTRUCTED? |
| | |
| | 5. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON LOTS 49 AND 60 APPEAR TO |
| | BE SIGNIFICANTLY LARGER THAN 6 FEET. |
| | |
| | 6. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS BEING 6 |
| | FEET WIDE, WHILE THE PLAT SHOWS 10 FEET. PLEASE ENSURE |
| | THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 7. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE REVISED DESIGN GUIDELINES DID |
| | NOT REFLECT THAT WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY |
| | COMMISSION. MAKE SURE THE REVISIONS ARE BEING DONE TO |
| | THE CURRENTLY-APPROVED REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 8. HOW DOES THE PROPOSED LAKE CONFIGURATION ALONG |
| | PRESIDENTIAL ESTATES CORRESPOND WITH EXISTING |
| | VEGETATION? PAGE 24 OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES REQUIRES |
| | THAT THEY REMAIN IN THEIR CURRENT LOCATION, EVEN IF |
| | THEY ENCROACH INTO THE EXISTING LAKE MAINTENANCE |
| | EASEMENT, OR THAT THEY BE RELOCATED TO THE PROPERTY |
| | OWNER?S PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 9. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE MEDIAN IN CONGRESS AVENUE? |
| | THIS WILL NEED TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT OF PBA #1. |
| | |
| | 10. A FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR ALL COMMON-AREA LANDSCAPING, ENTRY LANDSCAPING, |
| | BUFFER LANDSCAPING, ETC. |
| | |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE STATUS OF SIGNALIZATION REQUIREMENT |
| | ON CONGRESS AVENUE. PURSUANT TO PALM BEACH COUNTY, |
| | SURETY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF |
| | THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 12. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF PROVIDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL |
| | ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED ON PAGE 35 OF THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES? |
| | |
| | 13. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF PROVIDING THE |
| | UTILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED ON PAGE 36 |
| | OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES? |
| | |
| | 14. HOW WILL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | SUBDIVISION? IT IS EXPECTED THAT THEY WOULD ENTER |
| | THROUGH THE EGRESS LANE? TURNING RADIUS WOULD NEED TO |
| | BE VERIFIED. |
| | |
| | 15. THERE DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE MUCH STACKING FOR GUEST |
| | VEHICLES ENTERING INTO THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (4 |
| | CARS MAX). CARS BACKING UP INTO THE ROUND-ABOUT WILL |
| | CAUSE NUMEROUS PROPERTY WITH RESIDENTS TRYING TO ENTER, |
| | RESIDENTS/GUESTS COMING TO/FROM THE RESORT PARCEL, ETC. |
| | |
| | 16. THE PLAT SHOWS OPEN-SPACE TRACTS THAT ARE NOT |
| | REFLECTED ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL |
| | PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NEXT PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS AND CONCERNS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, |
| | 2013, TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OCTOBER 16, 2013, |
| | PLANNING BOARD HEARING. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE OCTOBER 16, 2013, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN OCTOBER 1, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED |
| | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED |
| | ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1448 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
