| Date |
Text |
| 2013-09-30 10:20:02 | CASE NO. PB 1577C |
| | BRAMAN AUDI DSI MINOR AMENDMENT - RESUBMITTAL 8-12-13 |
| | 2101 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY NOVEMBER 25, |
| | 2013), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1. REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE A |
| | BUSINESS TAX/CERTIFICATE OF USE FOR THE PROPERTY. THIS |
| | WILL NEED TO BE RECTIFIED AND ANY OUTSTANDING FEES PAID |
| | TO THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY APPROVALS FOR THIS SITE. |
| | |
| | 2. REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | APPLICATION DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ACREAGE OF THE SITE. |
| | THE ACREAGE NUMBERS FROM A SURVEY MAY CHANGE SOME OF |
| | THE DATA TABLES. THE SURVEY SHALL ALSO BE REVISED SO AS |
| | TO BE ABSTRACTED TO SHOW EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND |
| | RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY. |
| | |
| | 3. REPEAT COMMENT: THE CALCULATIONS ON THE SITE DATA |
| | TABLE ARE INCORRECT - STILL INCORRECT OPEN SPACE VALUE. |
| | |
| | 4. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC LETTER |
| | LISTS THE BUILD-OUT DATE AS DECEMBER 31, 2012. A |
| | REVISED EXTENSION LETTER IS REQUIRED WITH THIS |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 5. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN MODIFIES THE |
| | EXISTING CURB CUTS ON OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND |
| | CHILLINGWORTH DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION |
| | LETTER FROM FDOT THAT THEY WILL PERMIT THE CHANGES TO |
| | THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY. AN FDOT |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FOR OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND A CITY |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FOR CHILLINGWORTH DRIVE AND THE |
| | ALLEY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 6. REPEAT COMMENT (NO UPDATED SURVEY PROVIDED): THE |
| | LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE CHART IS USING INCORRECT DATA FOR |
| | THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL REQUIRED. THE FIGURES |
| | SHALL BE BASED ON THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 101,281 |
| | SQUARE FEET (SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED |
| | SURVEY). A FULL REVIEW OF PLANS WILL ONLY BE COMPLETED |
| | AFTER THE ACCURATE NUMBERS ARE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 7. NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | CIVIL AND SITE PLANS IN THE CARWASH AREA. ALL PLANS |
| | SHALL SHOW SAME SITE LAYOUT - CORRECT ANY OTHER AREAS |
| | WHERE THIS OCCURS. |
| | |
| | 8. REPEAT COMMENT: UTILITIES SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. NOTE: THERE ARE OVERHEAD LINES ALONG |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. - THERE IS A TAG STATING OVERHEAD |
| | LINE, BUT THERE IS NO OVERHEAD LINE SHOWN. THE |
| | UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, TO INCLUDE DRAINAGE, SHALL BE |
| | INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES AND |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. UPON COMPARISON OF THE MULTIPLE |
| | PLANS, THERE IS A FIRE HYDRANT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLAN |
| | IN THE SAME LOCATION AS A TREE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS |
| | AN EXAMPLE AS TO WHY ALL THE UTILITIES SHALL BE SHOWN |
| | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 9. REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PLAN CALLS |
| | FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALMOST EVERY TREE ON THE SITE. THESE |
| | TREES HAVE BEEN GROWING FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS (EVIDENCE |
| | BY THE 4 INCH CALIPER). STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THEIR |
| | REMOVAL FOR TREES WITH A 2.5 INCH CALIPER. NO |
| | VERIFICATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE NEWLY INSTALLED |
| | MATERIAL EXCEEDS THE REMOVED MATERIAL IN QUANTITY |
| | (MEASURE EXPRESSED AS DBH). ADDITIONALLY, STAFF DOES |
| | NOT SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING ROYAL PALM TREES |
| | AND THEIR REPLACEMENT WITH NEW ROYAL PALM TREES. TO |
| | MAINTAIN CONSISTENT HEIGHT, THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS |
| | SHALL BE RELOCATED ON-SITE INSTEAD OF PLANTING 17 NEW |
| | ROYAL PALMS (14 SLATED FOR REMOVAL). NOTE: A TREE |
| | ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE |
| | REMOVAL/RELOCATION OF ANY TREES OR THE APPROVAL OF THE |
| | FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 10. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PALM TREE SUBSTITUTION |
| | CALCULATIONS. WHILE THE PLANS SHOW THAT SOME PALM TREES |
| | ARE AT A 1:1 AND OTHERS AT A 2:1 RATIO, THE OVERALL |
| | PERCENTAGE OF PALM TREES SUBSTITUTED FOR |
| | SHADE/FLOWERING TREES IS NOT INCLUDED. PALMS SHALL BE |
| | NO MORE THAN 35% OF THE REQUIRED TREES ON THE SITE. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THERE ARE MORE THAN 35% PALM TREES ON THE |
| | SITE. |
| | |
| | 11. REPEAT COMMENT: IDENTIFY THE SHADE AND FLOWERING |
| | TREES ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 12. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING |
| | CALCULATIONS AND COMPLIANCE FOR EACH STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 13. REPEAT COMMENT: SHOW THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR CHILINGWORTH DRIVE AT OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD AND THE ALLEY. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL (EXCLUDING |
| | TREES) IN THESE AREAS MAY NOT EXCEED 18 INCHES IN |
| | HEIGHT. THE OKEECHOBEE/CHILLINGWORTH CORNER APPEARS TO |
| | HAVE DWARF SCARLET BUSH INSTALLED AT 24 INCHES IN |
| | HEIGHT WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. THE |
| | CHILLINGWORTH/ALLEY CORNER HAS A PORTION OF THE |
| | COCOPLUM HEDGE INSTALLED AT 24 INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN |
| | THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. |
| | |
| | 14. NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS TREES |
| | CONFLICTING WITH THE PARKING SPACES AND BOLLARDS ALONG |
| | SOUTHWEST SECTION OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD BUFFER. |
| | |
| | 15. REPEAT COMMENT: THE TRUCK LOADING SPACES NEED AN |
| | ADDITIONAL TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON THE EAST SIDE. |
| | THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND FAILS TO SHOW THE |
| | REQUIRED TREE. |
| | |
| | 16. REPEAT COMMENT: SIX BICYCLE PARKING SPACES (THREE |
| | RACKS/POSTS) ARE REQUIRED ON THE SITE. PROVIDE ALL |
| | DETAILS. NO DETAIL ON THE SIZE OF THE PAD OR TYPE OF |
| | RACKS WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 17. REPEAT COMMENT: THE LIGHT POSTS, FIRE HYDRANTS, |
| | BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, ETC. SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SITE |
| | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO |
| | CONFLICTS. COMPARING THE VARIOUS PLANS SHOW DIRECT |
| | CONFLICTS OF AT LEAST ONE LIGHT POST AND A ROYAL PALM |
| | TREE AND THE FIRE HYDRANT MENTIONED IN AN EARLIER |
| | COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 18. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM |
| | THE CITY'S SANITATION DIVISION THAT THE LOCATION AND |
| | SIZE OF THE COMPACTOR WILL ALLOW FOR THEM TO PICK UP |
| | THE WASTE. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO CONTAINERS MAY BE |
| | WHEELED INTO THE ALLEY FOR PICK UP. |
| | |
| | 19. NEW COMMENT: THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 20. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED DSI LIGHTING CONDITIONS. |
| | NO INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED LIGHTS AND THE CUT-OFF |
| | FEATURES WAS PROVIDED. COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITION IS NOT VERIFIED - THERE IS A VALUE SHOWN AT |
| | 2.1 FOOTCANDLES AND NO INFORMATION THAT THE REMAINING |
| | VALUES WERE MEASURED AT THREE (3) FEET ABOVE GRADE: |
| | |
| | LIGHT TRESPASS FROM THE SITE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0 |
| | FOOTCANDLES AT THREE (3) FEET ABOVE GRADE WHEN MEASURED |
| | AT THE CURB ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND |
| | CHILLINGWORTH DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 21. NEW COMMENT: THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW STANDARD DETAILS |
| | THAT DO NOT APPLY TO THE SITE. EX. THE STANDARD CITY |
| | DUMPSTER DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE PROPOSED COMPACTOR |
| | ENCLOSURE. ONLY DETAILS WHICH APPLY SHALL BE INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | 22. NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD LOOKS TO HAVE GOTTEN NARROWER ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL WHEN COMPARED TO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER WIDENING THE BUFFER IN FRONT OF THE |
| | FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREA BY NARROWING THE LARGE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA CONTAINING THE BICYCLE RACK TOWARD THE |
| | NORTH PART OF THE SITE. THE LARGER LANDSCAPE AREA WILL |
| | ENCOURAGE HEALTHIER GROWTH OF THE INSTALLED LANDSCAPE |
| | MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 23. NEW COMMENT: FPL HAS RAISED CONCERNS ABOUT THE |
| | PLANTING OF ROYAL PALM TREES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF |
| | THEIR OVERHEAD POWER LINES ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. |
| | PLEASE CONTACT BRIAN KANE OF FPL AT (561) 248-3721 TO |
| | VERIFY THAT FPL WILL SUPPORT THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF |
| | THE SPECIFIC TREES NEAR THEIR OVERHEAD LINES. PROVIDE |
| | WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT HE SUPPORTS YOUR SPECIFIC |
| | PLAN. IF NOT, THEN THE PLANS SHALL BE AMENDED TO |
| | CONFORM TO THE FPL REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
