| Date |
Text |
| 2013-06-11 11:19:45 | CASE NO. PB951U |
| | PALM BEACH OUTLETS - PBA 1, 2B & 4 FSPR |
| | 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (AUGUST 12, 2013), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300). |
| | |
| | 1) CHECK THE ELEVATION TAGS - SOME OF THE BUILDINGS ARE |
| | USING ZERO FEET AS THE AFF AND OTHERS USE 100 FEET, |
| | WITH THE ELEVATIONS MIXING BETWEEN THE TWO CALIBRATIONS |
| | AS THE ELEVATION DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED OUT ON THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL VERIFY THAT THE |
| | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FOR ALL |
| | BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PARKING LOT LAYER IS NOT READABLE (FADED) ON |
| | MANY OF THE SHEETS MAKING IT UNABLE TO VERIFY PARKING |
| | COUNTS AND SOME PARKING LOT FEATURES. |
| | |
| | 4) PARKING SPACES WHICH ARE OCCUPIED BY CART CORRALS |
| | MAY NOT BE COUNTED IN THE PARKING "PROVIDED" TOTAL. |
| | THEY NUMERIC TAGS FOR THE PARKING ROWS INCLUDE THE |
| | SPACES WITH THE CART CORRALS. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE LOCATED ALONG THE MIDDLE |
| | ENTRY DRIVE INTO PBA 1 PRESENT A DANGEROUS COMBINATION |
| | OF BACKING OUT INTO A HIGHER VOLUME, HIGHER SPEED |
| | DRIVEWAY. ESPECIALLY THE TWO SPACE BAY WHICH HAS A HIGH |
| | CONFLICT POTENTIAL WITH CARS LEAVING PBA 1. |
| | |
| | 6) THE RADIUS ON THE ENDS OF A ROW OF INTERIOR PARKING |
| | ISLANDS ON SHEET FSP-2 IS INCORRECT. THEY NEED TO |
| | EXTEND THE LENGTH OF THE SPACE BEFORE ARCING. |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET FSP-7 SHOWS A SIGN IN A PARKING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE NEW MEDIANS IN THE ACCESS "A" ENTRY DRIVE SHOW |
| | PAINTED AREAS ADJACENT TO THEM. PLEASE EXAMINE THE |
| | WIDENING OF THESE FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE (SHEET LP-7 |
| | GROUND COVER TAG POINTS TO THIS AREA). |
| | |
| | 9) PROVIDE A DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM THE WEST SIDE |
| | OF PBA 2A (NEAR VALET) TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PBA 1 |
| | BUILDING. THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK NETWORK PROVIDES A |
| | CONNECTION, BUT NOT A DIRECT ROUTE BETWEEN THE |
| | BUILDINGS. THE NATURAL INSTINCT WILL BE FOR CUSTOMERS |
| | TO WALK THE DIRECT ROUTE, WHICH IS EITHER IN THE DRIVE |
| | AISLE OR IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA. THIS BECOMES EVEN MORE |
| | NECESSARY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 2, WHERE THE |
| | BUILDINGS ARE EVEN CLOSER TOGETHER. |
| | |
| | 10) PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW BUILDINGS C & E HAVE ?DIRECT |
| | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK ON PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | BOULEVARD? AS REQUIRED BY THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 11) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE WALKWAY THROUGH THE |
| | PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING B-1? FOR IT BEING A |
| | SUBSTANTIAL WALKWAY, IT DOES NOT REALLY HELP CONNECT |
| | THE SITE IN A LOCATION THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT A |
| | PEDESTRIAN TO WALK (SUCH AS ALONG THE INTERIOR DRIVE |
| | AISLES). IT DOES NOT TIE INTO A DIRECT CROSSING OF THE |
| | ENTRY ROAD, NOR DOES IT PROVIDE A ROUTE THAT WOULD GET |
| | YOU CONVENIENTLY TO THE OUTLET PORTION OF THE SITE OR |
| | THE RESTAURANT ROW. AN ADDITIONAL CROSSING POINT OF |
| | ACCESS DRIVE A SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN PBA 1 AND THE |
| | RESTAURANT ROW. |
| | |
| | 12) LP-3 AND FSP-3 SHOW DIFFERENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY |
| | CONFIGURATIONS AT THE CONGRESS AVENUE ENTRY DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 13) BICYCLE RACK CALCULATIONS ROUND UP. PLEASE CORRECT |
| | ON THE "REQUIRED"? LINE ITEM. |
| | |
| | 14) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | FOR EACH PAD. |
| | |
| | 15) SOME BICYCLE SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE NORTH |
| | END OF BUILDING A. THE 20-SPACE RACKS MAY HAVE THEIR |
| | NUMBERS REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR THE MORE EVEN DISTRIBUTION |
| | OF BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES FOR PBA 1. |
| | |
| | 16) THE BICYCLE PAD AT THE SOUTH END OF BUILDING C |
| | SHALL HAVE THE SIX FOOT DEPTH FOR THE ENTIRE REQUIRED |
| | PAD WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 17) THE BUILDING H BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED |
| | TO A MORE VISIBLE LOCATION CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE OF |
| | BUILDING H. |
| | |
| | 18) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE SANITATION |
| | DIVISION THAT THE DUMPSTER LOCATIONS AND ORIENTATIONS |
| | ARE ADEQUATE FOR GARBAGE COLLECTION. |
| | |
| | 19) A NUMBER OF THE LOADING AREAS ARE LOCATED IN FRONT |
| | OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. NO LOADING MAY OCCUR WITHIN AN |
| | HOUR OF THE SCHEDULED TRASH OR RECYCLING PICK-UP. |
| | |
| | 20) THIS PLAN SHOWS EXTENSIVE USE OF CRAPE MYRTLE TREES |
| | IN THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO THE NORTH AND WEST |
| | PORTIONS OF THE SITE. SINCE THESE TREES SHED THEIR |
| | LEAVES FOR MANY MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR, THEY DON'T MAKE |
| | THE BEST PARKING LOT TREES TO PROVIDE SHADE. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE BEING USED IN SUCH ABUNDANCE IN |
| | THE PARKING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 21) IS IT THE INTENT TO COUNT THE FACAHATCHEE GRASS AS |
| | THE REQUIRED BUFFER HEDGE ALONG I-95? |
| | |
| | 22) COCONUT AND MONTGOMERY PALMS MAY NOT BE USED AS |
| | PARKING LOT INTERIOR OR TERMINAL TREES UNLESS THEY ARE |
| | INSTALLED IN GROUPS OF THREE. THIS CONDITION OCCURS IN |
| | THE PARKING LOT SOUTH OF BUILDING C & D. |
| | |
| | 23) THE PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING F INCLUDES 6 |
| | LT TREES. THIS TYPE IS NOT ON THE PLANT LIST AND LOOKS |
| | LIKE A DOUBLE COUNT OF THE TA TREES IN THE SAME AREA. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY YOUR OVERALL TREE COUNTS |
| | |
| | 24) TERMINAL ISLAND TREES ARE REQUIRED AT BOTH ENDS OF |
| | THE TRUCK LOADING/STAGING PARKING AREA NORTH OF PBA 1. |
| | |
| | 25) OAK TREE NO. 445 APPEARS TO BE IN THE DRIVE AISLE. |
| | |
| | 26) SHEET LP-8 HAS TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS WITH NO TREES, |
| | ONE TREE SHOWN NOT IN THE TERMINAL ISLAND BUT RATHER IN |
| | FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER OPENING AND ONE MEDJOOL THAT |
| | SHOULD BE LOCATED MORE CENTRALLY IN THE TERMINAL ISLAND |
| | WHERE TWO PARKING ROWS MEET. |
| | |
| | 27) WHY ARE OAK TREES BEING RELOCATED INTO AN AREA THAT |
| | WILL BE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PHASE 2 EXPANSION? THIS |
| | SEEMS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE AS THESE TREES WILL NEED TO BE |
| | RELOCATED AGAIN. THE PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS 2 OF |
| | THE 3 AFFECTED OAK TREES RELOCATED (ONE INTO A NOT |
| | SUSTAINABLE TERMINAL ISLAND LOCATION WHERE THE OTHER |
| | TERMINAL TREE IS MISSING). |
| | |
| | 28) THE FOUNDATION PLANTING TABLE ON SHEET LP-10 LISTS |
| | THE TOTAL LINEAR FEET AROUND EACH BUILDING, BUT FAILS |
| | TO SHOW THE LINEAR FEET OF FOUNDATION PLANTING PROVIDED |
| | FOR EACH BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 29) PLANT HEDGES AT THE BASE OF ALL DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURES. |
| | |
| | 30) PROVIDE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF |
| | THE COMPACTOR SCREEN WALLS BEHIND ALL OF THE BUILDINGS |
| | IN PBA 1. |
| | |
| | 31) THERE ARE A LOT OF SODDED AREAS ALONG THE REAR OF |
| | THE BUILDINGS IN PBA 1. PLEASE CONSIDER PLANTING SOME |
| | HEDGES ALONG THE BASE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 32) THE MULCH BED BEHIND BUILDING A IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 33) THE BUILDING J-11 SERVICE COURT DOES NOT SHOW THE |
| | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ACROSS FROM THE OPENING. |
| | |
| | 34) SCREEN THE TRANSFORMERS WITH HEDGES ON THE NON-DOOR |
| | SIDES. |
| | |
| | 35) HOW WILL THE 10 FOOT ELECTRIC UTILITY EASEMENT NOT |
| | AFFECT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE, ESPECIALLY SINCE IT |
| | TRAVERSES LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND A FEW TREE GRATES? |
| | |
| | 35) LIVE OAK #55 SEEMS EXTREMELY CLOSE TO UTILITY |
| | INFRASTRUCTURE. PLEASE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 37) THE NEW TREES IN THE PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER IN |
| | FRONT OF BUILDING E APPEAR TO HAVE CONFLICTS WITH |
| | UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. PLEASE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 38) AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS NOW SHOWN BISECTING A |
| | TERMINAL ISLAND IN FRONT OF BUILDING B-1 FORCING THE |
| | SHIFTING OF A TREE OUT OF THE ISLAND. THIS WAS NOT |
| | PERMITTED ON THE PREVIOUS PLAN AND IS NOT PERMITTED ON |
| | THIS REDESIGN. |
| | |
| | 39) PLEASE DO NOT CREATE CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND LIGHT |
| | POLES: |
| | |
| | A. ONE OF THE LIGHT POLES IN A TERMINAL ISLAND BY |
| | BUILDING E LOOKS VERY CLOSE TO THE TREE. |
| | B. OAK TREE NO. 689 HAS A LIGHT POLE LOCATED EXTREMELY |
| | CLOSE TO IT, ESPECIALLY IN LIGHT OF THE PLACEMENT OF |
| | THE TREE IN A LARGE LANDSCAPE ISLAND WHICH WILL LET THE |
| | TREE GROW TO A LARGER SIZE. |
| | C. OAK TREE NOS. 39 AND 40 SEEM CLOSE TOGETHER IN THE |
| | ISLAND AND HAVE A LIGHT POLE BETWEEN THEM. |
| | D. LIGHT POST BETWEEN 2 GUMBO LIMBO TREES IN THE |
| | PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING B1. |
| | |
| | 40) SHEETS FSP-2 AND LP-2 HAVE A LIGHT POLE SHOWN IN A |
| | PARKING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 41) THE OVERALL REAR ELEVATION FOR BUILDING B2 IS |
| | MISLABELED. |
| | |
| | 42) FOR BUILDING C, PLEASE CONSIDER CHANGING THE MIDDLE |
| | PANEL ON THE SOUTH FA?ADE, WEST OF THE WALL WITH THE |
| | SEATING AREA, TO HAVE THE SIMILAR RHYTHM AS THE WEST |
| | FA?ADE TO COMPLY MORE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 43) FOR BUILDING C, PLEASE EXPLAIN THE TEMPORARY |
| | HOLIDAY STORAGE AND THE TRAILER MOUNTED GENERATOR. |
| | |
| | 44) VARIOUS PLANS SHOW BUILDING E HAVING 1,084 SQ. FT. |
| | OR 1,684 SQ. FT. |
| | |
| | 45) THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ALLOW TWO, 10 FOOT WIDE DRIVE |
| | AISLES. THE PLANS FOR BUILDING E SHOW ONE, 20 FOOT WIDE |
| | DRIVE AISLE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. WHY DOES THE DRIVE |
| | AISLE NEED TO BE SO WIDE WHEN THE STACKING AND BY-PASS |
| | ARE ONLY AT THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE DRIVE AISLE? |
| | |
| | 46) SHOW THE FIVE CAR STACKING DISTANCE FOR THE |
| | BUILDING E DRIVE-THRU. |
| | |
| | 47) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHERE THE DRIVE-THRU ORDER SCREENS |
| | AND SERVICE WINDOWS WILL BE FOR BUILDING E. |
| | |
| | 48) THE EAST WALL OF BUILDING F (BJ'S) IS A RUN OF MORE |
| | THAN 50 FEET WITHOUT ANY BREAKS IN THE HORIZONTAL |
| | PLANE. PLEASE INCORPORATE ELEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 49) THE LEFT ELEVATION OF BUILDING G HAS NO WINDOWS ON |
| | THE PALM BEACH LAKES FRONTAGE. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | FOOTPRINT ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | FOOTPRINT ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 50) PLEASE SUPPLY BETTER SIDE VIEW OF BUILDING G - |
| | PREFERABLY AN EXAMPLE OF ONE THAT IS CURRENTLY BUILT. |
| | THE PARAPET AND ARCHED PARAPET DO NOT LOOK LIKE THEY |
| | SEAMLESSLY INTEGRATE WITH THE BUILDING FROM THE |
| | SUPPLIED ELEVATION DRAWINGS. IS THE SEMICIRCULAR AWNING |
| | PROTRUDING FROM THE BUILDING WITH NO SUPPORTS? |
| | |
| | 51) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RR ON THE ENTRY DOOR TO |
| | BUILDING G IS SIGNAGE. |
| | |
| | 52) THESE PLANS REFLECT CHANGES TO THE APPROVED |
| | BUILDING PERMIT PLANS FOR BUILDING J. PLEASE BE AWARE |
| | THAT ONCE APPROVED, THESE BECOME THE PLAN OF RECORD, |
| | AND THE BUILDING PERMIT PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED |
| | PRIOR TO A C.O. FOR BUILDING J. |
| | |
| | 53) WHAT IS THE DISTANCE SEPARATING THE BOLLARDS IN THE |
| | BUILDING J ENTRYWAYS? THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE INCLUDED |
| | ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 54) THE SCREEN WALLS REFERENCED TO THE WEST OF BUILDING |
| | J-1 DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET FSP-2.1 (SHOWN ON FSP-2). |
| | |
| | 55) THE REVISED SOUTH ELEVATIONS WHICH INCLUDE BUILDING |
| | J-1 DO NOT SHOW THE NEW LOADING DOCK AREA EXTENSION. |
| | |
| | 56) THERE NEEDS TO BE LANDSCAPE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE |
| | SCREEN WALL FOR THE NEW TRANSFORMER LOCATION AT |
| | BUILDING J-1. |
| | |
| | 57) SHEET LP-2.1 HAS BUILDING FOOTPRINT LAYER MISSING. |
| | |
| | 58) THE BICYCLE RACK WEST OF J-11 SHALL BE MOVED TO A |
| | LOCATION THAT IS CLOSER TO AN ENTRY POINT TO THE OUTLET |
| | CENTER. |
| | |
| | 59) THE COMPACTOR FOR BUILDING J-11 IS VISIBLE DIRECTLY |
| | ACROSS FROM THE SERVICE BAY OPENING WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED BY THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 60) SIGN PLAN REVIEW IS PENDING. |
| | |
| |
Print |
