| Date |
Text |
| 2013-06-25 16:14:47 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 06.25.2013 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z13040028 & Z13040029 |
| | CASE NO.: PB CASE #1635 & 1635A |
| | ADDRESS: 1112 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY |
| | STUDIOS |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND |
| | RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - CONSTRUCTION OF A |
| | 96-UNIT MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | REVIEW LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. WHILE THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | (EASTWARD HO!), A REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2. NOTATION, DETAILS, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED REGARDING |
| | THE LANDSCAPE SCREEN TO BE PLACED ON THE SOUTH WALL OF |
| | THE PARKING STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 3. THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS |
| | PROVIDED ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE ELEVATIONS |
| | SHOW TERRACING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING, |
| | AS WELL AS ALONG THE EAST ELEVATION, WHICH DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO EXIST ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, IF LANDSCAPING IS GOING TO BE SHOWN ON |
| | THE ELEVATIONS, PLEASE JUST ENSURE THAT WHAT IS SHOWN |
| | IS AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT IS PROPOSED ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS THEMSELVES. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 3D RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT |
| | MATCH THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS PROPOSED. PLEASE ENSURE |
| | THAT THE RENDERINGS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS. |
| | |
| | 5. THE HEIGHT OF THE PERMANENT MONUMENT SIGN SHALL NOT |
| | EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT STRUCTURAL COLUMNS DO NOT |
| | ENCROACH INTO PARKING SPACES OR DRIVE AISLES. AT THE |
| | FAR NORTH END OF THE LOWER LEVEL PARKING DECK, THERE |
| | APPEARS TO BE A COLUMN THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE RAMP, |
| | SPECIFICALLY TRAFFIC HEADING IN THE "DOWN" DIRECTION. |
| | |
| | 7. THE TWO (2) 2-CAR GARAGES LOCATED ON THE UPPER LEVEL |
| | PARKING DECK DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE 24 FEET OF BACK-OUT |
| | BETWEEN THE GARAGE DOOR AND THE STRUCTURAL COLUMN. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NOT CODE-RELATED, HOWEVER |
| | ARE PROVIDED BY STAFF FOR CONSIDERATION: |
| | |
| | A. THERE SHOULD BE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AT THE NORTH |
| | END OF THE SITE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE LOBBY |
| | LEVEL SO THAT PEDESTRIANS COMING FROM THE NORTH DO NOT |
| | HAVE TO WALK UP THE DRIVEWAY, OR GO ALL THE WAY TO THE |
| | SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | B. THE TENANT STORAGE DOORS ARE SHOWN SWINGING OUT INTO |
| | THE PARKING SPACE...THIS WILL CONFLICT WITH ANY CAR |
| | THAT IS PARKED THERE. TENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO MOVE |
| | THEIR CARS IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE STORAGE AREA. |
| | |
| | C. MAKE SURE THAT THE SUBMITTED PLANS ALSO ADDRESS THE |
| | ISSUE OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FRONT PLAZA, AS DISCUSSED |
| | PREVIOUSLY. PURSUANT TO PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE GARAGE IN THAT AREA WAS TO BE LOWERED AND |
| | THE SLOPE LEADING UP TO THE WATER FEATURE WAS TO BE |
| | ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | D. LANDSCAPE SCREENING, CONSISTING OF HEDGES, ETC. |
| | SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AROUND THE UTILITY ELEMENTS ALONG |
| | SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE (I.E. BACKFLOW PREVENTER, ETC.) |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JULY 16, 2013 |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, JULY 2, 2013. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1448 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
