| Date |
Text |
| 2013-05-08 12:41:18 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.08.2013 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z13040028 & Z13040029 |
| | CASE NO.: PB CASE #1635 & 1635A |
| | ADDRESS: 1112 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY |
| | STUDIOS |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND |
| | RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ? CONSTRUCTION OF A |
| | 96-UNIT MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | REVIEW LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. WHILE THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | (EASTWARD HO!), A REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL OF SERVICE |
| | ANALYSIS FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE COPIES OF ALL UTILITY LETTERS. THE |
| | FOLLOWING LETTERS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED: |
| | A. AT&T |
| | B. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT |
| | C. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 4. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO EASEMENTS ON THE |
| | PROPERTY. |
| | 5. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS, ETC.? |
| | HAS ANY OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION BEEN PROVIDED FROM THE |
| | ADJACENT CONDOMINIUM AND NEARBY RESIDENTIAL |
| | NEIGHBORHOODS? WHAT ADDITIONAL OUTREACH IS PLANNED |
| | PRIOR TO THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | 6. THE PARKING DETAIL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). |
| | 7. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOES NOT |
| | CONTAIN A COVERED CANOPY EXTENDING TO THE WATER |
| | FEATURE. |
| | 8. THE IN-BOUND AND OUT-BOUND ENTRY DRIVES DO NOT |
| | APPEAR TO LINE UP ON MANY OF THE PAGES. |
| | 9. PLEASE BE SURE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE OUTLINE OF |
| | ALL OF THE CANOPIES/STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS. IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THERE IS A CANOPY LINE OR OTHER STRUCTURAL |
| | OVERHANG SHOWN ON SHEETS A-3 AND A-4 THAT IS NOT SHOWN |
| | ELSEWHERE. |
| | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACKS TO ALL OF THE OPEN-AIR |
| | PAVILIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ACCESSORY STRUCTURES |
| | SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET FROM SIDE AND REAR |
| | PROPERTY LINES. |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PAVILIONS?HEIGHT, |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL, ETC. |
| | 12. PLEASE CLARIFY THE FIRE LINE ON THE PLANS?IN SOME |
| | AREAS IT IS SHOWN AS A DASHED LINE?IN OTHERS IT APPEARS |
| | TO BE A SOLID LINE. |
| | 13. CAN YOU PLEASE SEPARATE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INTO ONE |
| | SHEET THAT SHOWS GRADE-LEVEL PLANTING, AND THE OTHER |
| | SHEETS SHOWING TERRACE LEVEL AND AMENITY/POOL LEVEL |
| | PLANTING, ETC. |
| | 14. THE EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE LABELED |
| | INCORRECTLY. |
| | 15. CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE MADE REGARDING THE SOUTH |
| | ELEVATION THE FACT THAT 40+ FEET OF BLANK WALL APPEARS |
| | TO BE FACING THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. |
| | WHILE THERE IS LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN THE BUFFER, |
| | ARE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO HELP SOFTEN THE APPEARANCE OF |
| | THIS? |
| | 16. THE OUTLINE OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT APPEAR TO |
| | MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLANS?OR DOES THE SITE |
| | PLAN SHOW THE OUTLINE OF THE RAILINGS? PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 17. URBAN DESIGN STAFF IS WONDERING IF ALTERNATIVES |
| | COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FRONT CIRCULATION PATTERN |
| | AND PLAZA CONFIGURATION TO CREATE A SPACE THAT IS MORE |
| | INTEGRATED AND IS A CONTINUATION OF THE CITY?S PUBLIC |
| | WATERFRONT, AS OPPOSED TO SPACE THAT IS ENTIRELY |
| | PRIVATE AND ONLY SERVES AS AN ENTRANCE INTO THE |
| | PROJECT. |
| | 18. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 3D RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT |
| | MATCH THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS PROPOSED. PLEASE ENSURE |
| | THAT THE RENDERINGS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS. |
| | 19. THE CITY?S ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT |
| | WILL NEED TO SIGN OFF ON THE PROPOSED TRASH AREA AND |
| | THE CIRCULATION PATTERN REQUIRED FOR INGRESS/EGRESS. |
| | 20. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE POOL WILL NEED TO BE ENCLOSED |
| | BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE AT LEAST FOUR (4) FEET |
| | IN HEIGHT TO PREVENT ACCESS. SELF-CLOSING AND |
| | SELF-LATCHING GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | 21. TANDEM PARKING SPACES MAY BE PROVIDED SO LONG AS |
| | THE TANDEM SPACES ARE ASSIGNED TO THE SAME UNIT. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | TO BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS UTILIZING A |
| | CITY-APPROVED FORM. ALL GUEST SPACES SHALL NOT BE |
| | TANDEM. |
| | 22. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-305(C)(2) ACCESSORY |
| | STRUCTURES SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM |
| | THE SEAWALL. |
| | 23. WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED |
| | FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT?PLEASE ADJUST THE WALL ON THE |
| | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 24. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES A UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE |
| | SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. IS THIS EXISTING OR |
| | PROPOSED? PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS WITH REGARD TO |
| | THE FRONT PLAZA. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT IS RETAINING |
| | WALLS, PLANTERS, ETC. |
| | 26. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-313(1)(A), DEVELOPMENTS OF |
| | GREATER THAN 75 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE LIMITED TO |
| | TWO (2) ACCESS POINTS. |
| | 27. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING ANY PROPOSED |
| | SIGNAGE. |
| | 28. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE FREESTANDING |
| | SIGN TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IS THIS A DIRECTIONAL |
| | SIGN OR IS IT PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION FOR THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT? |
| | 29. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT STRUCTURAL COLUMNS DO NOT |
| | ENCROACH INTO PARKING SPACES. THERE APPEARS TO BE A |
| | CONFLICT ON SHEET A-1. |
| | 30. SOME CONSIDERATIONS MAY NEED TO BE MADE REGARDING |
| | MANEUVERABILITY WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE. SEVERAL |
| | PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE VERY DIFFICULT TO MANEUVER |
| | OUT OF, ESPECIALLY WITH TANDEM PARKING BEING PROVIDED. |
| | 31. SOME TURN-AROUND SPACES MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE. |
| | 32. IT MAY JUST BE AN ISSUE IN THE LINE THICKNESS ON |
| | THE PLANS, BUT MANY OF THE PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE |
| | SHORT. PLEASE VERIFY. |
| | 33. WHAT ARE THE TWO (2) DOORS EXITING TO THE WEST ON |
| | SHEET A-2 PROVIDE ACCESS TO? IT APPEARS THAT THIS |
| | SECTION IS BELOW THE GRADE OF THE DROP-OFF AREA. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | 34. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE WALL PROPOSED ON THE |
| | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. |
| | 35. SHADE/FLOWERING TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ONE (1) |
| | PER 30 LINEAR FEET ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | CLUSTERING MAY BE PERMITTED OR PLANTED IRREGULARLY, BUT |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THIS PROVISION IS BEING MET. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 18, 2013 |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 18, 2013 PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN JUNE 3, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED |
| | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED |
| | ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1448 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
