| Date |
Text |
| 2013-05-08 10:32:20 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.08.2013 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z13040024 & Z13040025 |
| | CASE NO.: PB CASE #1231B & C |
| | ADDRESS: 1101 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY |
| | STUDIOS |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND |
| | MAJOR PD AMENDMENT ? MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDE FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS |
| | TO THE SITE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE CLARIFY THE STATEMENT ON THE PLAN INDICATING |
| | THAT ?FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE APPROVED AS PART OF A |
| | FUTURE FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW?. I BELIEVE ANY CHANGES |
| | TO THE PLAN AND THE PROCESS REQUIRED TO DO SO WOULD BE |
| | REGULATED BY SECTION 94-207(E) ? AMENDMENTS TO APPROVED |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. SOME AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED |
| | MAJOR AMENDMENTS AND REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. |
| | 2. ACCORDING TO THE LETTER FROM FPU, THERE ARE GAS |
| | FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | PLEASE ENSURE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL CONFLICTS WITH |
| | SUCH UTILITIES. |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING? |
| | A. AT&T |
| | B. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT |
| | C. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER APPROVING TRAFFIC |
| | CONCURRENCY FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | 5. WITH REGARD TO THE FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS? |
| | A. THE TABLE SHOWN ON PAGE 2 APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT. |
| | IT LISTS THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR PARCELS |
| | 5 AND 6 INCORRECTLY. THE EXISTING POTENTIAL FOR PARCEL |
| | 5 SHOULD BE 20,255 SQ. FT., WHILE THE EXISTING |
| | POTENTIAL OF PARCEL 6 SHOULD BE 16,008 SQ. FT. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE TRIP GENERATION TABLES ACCURATELY |
| | REFLECT THIS. |
| | 6. PLEASE BE SURE TO PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE |
| | SURVEY. |
| | 7. THERE WILL HAVE TO BE COORDINATION IN THE TIMING OF |
| | THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED FOR CHAPEL BY THE LAKE. THE |
| | PARKING ON THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PARCEL WILL NEED TO |
| | BE CONFORMING TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) PRIOR |
| | TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY OF THE PARKING ON THE CHAPEL BY |
| | THE LAKE PARCEL(S). |
| | 8. PLEASE BE SURE THAT THE SURVEY AND SITE/LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS ACCURATELY REFLECT ALL EASEMENTS. JUST WANT TO |
| | CONFIRM THAT THE ONLY PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS ALONG |
| | THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. |
| | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION FROM THE CITY?S |
| | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT ONLY ONE |
| | (1) DUMPSTER WILL BE SUFFICIENT. IT APPEARS THAT NO |
| | DUMPSTERS ARE BEING PROVIDED FOR THE 2-STORY BUILDINGS |
| | IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND IS ONE |
| | SUFFICIENT FOR ALL OTHER ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE |
| | CHURCH FACILITY? |
| | 10. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM FAR PERMITTED WITHIN |
| | THE CSPD IS 1.0, NOT 0.75; THE SITE DATE TABLE ON SHEET |
| | CSP-1 IS INCORRECT. |
| | 11. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE WILL HAVE TO BE A CONDITION |
| | PLACED IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT NO ADDITIONAL |
| | RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN |
| | THE CSPD AND THAT THE EXISTING UNITS MAY NOT BE |
| | EXPANDED SO AS TO CREATE A NEW NONCONFORMITY, OR |
| | INCREASE THE ?EXISTING? NONCONFORMITY. |
| | 12. PLEASE NOTE THE HEIGHTS AND/OR PROVIDE DETAILS OF |
| | ALL EXISTING/PROPOSED FENCING. IT APPEARS THAT THE ONLY |
| | FENCING ON THE PROPERTY IS AROUND THE OUTDOOR PLAY ARE, |
| | BUT IT ALSO SHOWS A FENCE EXTENDING WEST ACROSS THE |
| | DRIVE AISLE, AND THEN NORTH ALONG OLIVE AVENUE; IS THIS |
| | FENCE PROPOSED TO REMAIN? ENSURE THAT FENCES WITHIN THE |
| | FRONT SETBACK DO NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | 13. IS ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTING BEING PROPOSED? LIGHTING |
| | SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. |
| | 14. ALL PARKING STRIPING SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. YOU MAY EMAIL ME AND I CAN SEND YOU A COPY |
| | OF THE DETAIL TO BE INSERTED INTO THE PLANS. |
| | 15. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-313(1)(A), NONRESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDING 300 PARKING SPACES SHALL NOT HAVE |
| | MORE THAN TWO (2) ACCESS POINTS ONTO EACH RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, SECTION 94-313(1)(B) PROVIDES THAT NO |
| | PROPERTY SHALL HAVE A TOTAL OF MORE THAN FOUR (4) |
| | ACCESS POINTS. |
| | 16. THERE HAVE BEEN CONCERNS EXPRESSED ABOUT THE |
| | POTENTIAL LOSS OF STUDENT HOUSING FOR THE UNIVERSITY. |
| | HAS THERE BEEN ANY COORDINATION WITH THE UNIVERSITY AS |
| | TO HOW THESE LOSS OF UNITS WILL BE ACCOUNTED FOR? |
| | 17. WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE ON SHEET LP-1, |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THAT THE ?PROVIDED? NUMBERS ACCURATELY |
| | REFLECT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN?AND NOT THAT IT IS |
| | EXACTLY THE MINIMUM REQUIRED. |
| | 18. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PLANT COUNTS IN THE PLANT |
| | LIST. |
| | 19. IN THE ANGLED PARKING IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF |
| | THE PROPERTY, PLEASE CONSIDER ?SAW-TOOTHING? THE CURB |
| | LINE AND REMOVING THE WHEEL STOPS TO INCREASE THE |
| | AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS AREA. THIS CAN ALSO BE DONE IN THE |
| | ANGLED PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | 20. STAFF IS CONTINUING TO REVIEW THE TRAFFIC IMPACT |
| | ANALYSIS AND MAY HAVE SOME PRELIMINARY CONCERNS WITH |
| | REGARD TO THE PROPOSED TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND MAY WANT |
| | TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE APPLICANT?S TRAFFIC CONSULTANT IN |
| | THE NEAR FUTURE. |
| | 21. IT APPEARS THAT THE SIDEWALKS AND ACCESS AISLES FOR |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES DO NOT LINE UP. |
| | 22. TWO (2) SHADE TREES ARE MISSING IN THE LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLAND IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WHERE |
| | THERE IS CROSS-ACCESS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. |
| | 23. HAS THERE BEEN ANY CONSIDERATION OF UTILIZING BERMS |
| | OR OTHER VARIATIONS IN TOPOGRAPHY TO ENHANCE THE |
| | BUFFER? |
| | 24. IS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION OF UTILIZING AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL FOR THOSE PARKING SPACES THAT WILL |
| | BE USED INFREQUENTLY? THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE CITY TO |
| | CONSIDER A TEXT CHANGE TO THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, BUT THIS MAY BE A GOOD CASE |
| | STUDY. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER WITH |
| | THE APPLICANT AND SEE WHAT POSSIBILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. |
| | 25. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS AND |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE RACK THAT IS PROPOSED. BE SURE |
| | THAT THE RACK CONFORMS TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 26. DO THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE |
| | DISTRIBUTED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE VARIOUS USES/ENTRANCES |
| | INTO THE BUILDINGS? |
| | 27. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT 494 PARKING |
| | SPACES ARE PROVIDED, BUT THE PLANS INDICATE 493; PLEASE |
| | ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 28. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE |
| | CHILLER/MAINTENANCE BUILDING. IS THIS BUILDING PROPOSED |
| | AT THIS TIME, OR IS IT FUTURE CONSTRUCTION? |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 18, 2013 |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 18, 2013 PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN JUNE 3, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED |
| | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED |
| | ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1448 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
