| Date |
Text |
| 2013-03-28 17:17:43 | CASE NO. PB 1223F |
| | WEST PALM HOSPITAL SIGNAGE PROGRAM 1ST RESUBMITTAL |
| | 2201 45TH STREET |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE RESBMITTAL COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY |
| | ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 |
| | PM ON MONDAY, APRIL 15, 2013, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | MAY 21, 2013 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS WITHIN |
| | 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (MARCH 29, |
| | 2013), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. |
| | 4357-11. |
| | |
| | 1) THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL FAILS TO |
| | SHOW THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY - |
| | MISSING EXISTING SIGN, THE CURBING AND OTHER FEATURES |
| | SUCH AS THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND FIRE HYDRANT. IT IS |
| | IMPORTANT TO LOCATE THESE FEATURES ON BOTH THE SURVEY |
| | AND SUBSEQUENT SITE PLAN IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE SIGN IS |
| | NOT IMPROPERLY LOCATED. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE TO SCALE. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, THE ENTRY SIGN AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT |
| | A SCALE NO GREATER THAN 1:30 WITH THE SIGNS SHOWN AT |
| | ACCURATE SIZE AND IN THE CORRECT LOCATION IN |
| | RELATIONSHIP TO THE ENTRY FEATURES. STAFF NEEDS TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM FOR THE PLACEMENT |
| | OF THE SPECIFIC EIGHT (8) FOOT LONG SIGNS IN THESE |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE STATED DIMENSIONS ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE LISTED |
| | ON THE SITE PLAN ARE INCORRECT WHEN COMPARED TO THE |
| | SURVEY. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS APPROXIMATELY 30 MORE |
| | LINEAR FEET THEN THE SURVEY. SURVEY - 1,275 LINEAR FEET |
| | VS. SITE PLAN - 1,342 LINEAR FEET. THIS AFFECTS THE |
| | AMOUNT OF SIGNAGE PERMITTED. DUE TO THE PENDING UNITY |
| | OF TITLE TO ALLOW THE SIGNS ON 45TH STREET, THE |
| | CONGRESS AVENUE FRONTAGE IS CONSIDERED THE SIDE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. SIGNS ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE ARE |
| | LIMITED TO 50% OF THE LINEAR FRONTAGE, THUS A TOTAL OF |
| | 637.5 SQUARE FEET OF FREE STANDING SIGNAGE IS |
| | PERMITTED. EACH FACE OF THE TWO PROPOSED SIGNS MAY BE A |
| | MAXIMUM OF 159 SQUARE FEET. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SITE PLAN SHOWS SIGNS THAT ARE |
| | APPROXIMATELY 87 SQUARE FEET PER FACE, NOT 64 SQUARE |
| | FEET AS LISTED. THE TEXT PROVIDES FOR SIGNS THAT ARE |
| | 102 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE, YET LISTS THAT SIGNS MAY BE A |
| | MAXIMUM OF 75 SQUARE FEET PER FACE. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | THE ENTIRE MASS OF THE SIGN IS COUNTED TOWARD THE |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE, NOT JUST THE SIGN COPY - SEE SECTION |
| | 94-405(A) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. A MEETING IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE THE WAY |
| | THE FREE STANDING SIGNS WILL BE REGULATED, TO CLEAR UP |
| | THE DISCREPANCIES AND TO DISCUSS HOW FUTURE CHANGES CAN |
| | BE HANDLED. |
| | |
| | 5) THE DIRECTIONAL SIGN TEXT SETS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT |
| | AND WIDTH OF THE SIGN AT 6' X 3' FOR AN 18 SQUARE FOOT |
| | SIGN, YET IT SETS THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA AT 15 SQUARE |
| | FEET PER SIGN FACE. PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS DISCREPANCY. |
| | THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FULL WIDTH OF THE |
| | SIGN - IF SHOWS A DIMENSION OF 2 FEET 9.5 INCHES, BUT |
| | FAILS TO INCLUDE THE PORTIONS OF THE TEXT BOX WHICH |
| | EXTEND PAST THE MONUMENT PART OF THE SIGN. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT THE ENTIRE MASS OF THE SIGN IS COUNTED TOWARD THE |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE, NOT JUST THE SIGN COPY - SEE SECTION |
| | 94-405(A) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE PROPOSAL IS NOW TO INCLUDE ONLY 6 DIRECTIONAL |
| | SIGNS ON THE SITE. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR RESPONSE |
| | STATED THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE THE FLEXIBILITY IN |
| | FUTURE DIRECTIONAL SIGN PLACEMENT. STAFF IS WILLING TO |
| | ADD A PROVISION TO THE SIGNAGE PROGRAM THAT PERMITS THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS IF A MINOR |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT IS APPROVED FOR THE |
| | ADDITIONAL SIGN(S) LOCATION(S). |
| | |
| | 7) THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SETBACK |
| | FROM CONGRESS AVENUE SO THAT THEY ARE NOT CONFUSED WITH |
| | PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE |
| | PROPOSED PLACEMENT LOCATIONS AND WILL RECOMMEND A 100 |
| | FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 8) WALL SIGNAGE - STAFF AGREES THAT A MEETING IS |
| | NECESSARY TO CLARIFY THE WALL SIGNAGE COMMENTS GOING |
| | FORWARD. THE EXISTING FA?ADE AREA IS NECESSARY TO |
| | DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF WALL SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | PERMITTED ON THE BUILDINGS. THIS THEN DETERMINES IF A |
| | WAIVER TO THE AMOUNT OF SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED. THE NUMBER |
| | OF SIGNS PROPOSED WILL REQUIRE A WAIVER FROM THE NUMBER |
| | OF SIGNS PERMITTED ON THE SITE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
