| Date |
Text |
| 2013-01-30 10:16:31 | 1. STAIRS AND RAISED PLANTERS ADJACENT TO THE MAIN |
| | ENTRANCE ALONG EVERNIA STREET ENCROACH INTO THE ROW. |
| | STAIRS SHALL BE MOVED INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE. RAISED |
| | PLANTERS CAN BE CHANGED TO PLANTING BEDS. |
| | 2. BIKE RACKS LOCATED NEXT TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE DO |
| | NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM INSTALLATION STANDARDS. |
| | 3. PLEASE ADJUST THE BUILDING TABLE ON SHEET SPA-3 TO |
| | ACCURATELY REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF ACTIVE USES |
| | PROVIDED ALONG EVERNIA STREET (NON-ACTIVE USES INCLUDE |
| | USES SUCH AS PARKING, STORAGE, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL). |
| | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE THE TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA |
| | ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION INCLUDED IN SECTION 94-109 |
| | OF THE ZLDR IN THE BUILDING TABLE. TABLE SHALL INCLUDE |
| | ALSO THE GROSS BUILDING AREA FOR EACH FLOOR AND |
| | MECHANICAL AREA FOR EACH FLOOR. |
| | 5. PLEASE ADJUST THE GRAPHICS THAT DEPICT AREAS COUNTED |
| | AS GROSS BUILDING AREA BASED ON THE DEFINITION ON |
| | SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDR. |
| | 6. AIR RIGHT EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | BALCONIES ENCROACHING INTO THE ROW. |
| | 7. PLEASE INDICATE THE USE OF THE ENCLOSED ROOM ON THE |
| | ROOF. |
| | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC THAT INDICATES HOW THE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATION WAS |
| | ACHIEVED. TABLE IV-4 REQUIRES "FOR BULDING FRONTAGES |
| | GREATER THAN 150', NO FACADE SHALL EXCEED 60% OF THE |
| | BUILDING FRONTAGE WITHOUT PROVIDING A PLANAR BREAK OF |
| | MULTIPLE PLANAR BREAKS A MINIMUM OF 3' EN DEPTH. THE |
| | CUMULATIVE HOTIZONTAL LENGHT OF ALL PLANAR BREAKS SHALL |
| | BE REATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 20% OF THE BUILDING |
| | FRONTAGE." THE PLANAR BREAK SHALL OCCUR FOR THE FULL |
| | HEIGHT OF THE PODIUM. |
| | 9. PUMP ROOM DOOR ON WEST ELEVATION IS LANDING OVER 2 |
| | FEET ABOVE THESIDEWALK GRADE. |
| | 10. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ENCLOSED AND |
| | SCREENED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING DESIGN AS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL. |
| | 11. |
| | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: |
| | 1. JAPANESE PRIVET IDENTIFIED AS THE MEDIUM TREES |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE VEGETATED AREA COVERAGE IS NOT LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE ROOFTOP GARDEN. |
| | 2. THE PLANT SCHEDULE DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE |
| | EXACT NUMBER OF ALEXANDER PALMS DEPICTED IN THE |
| | DRAWINGS (10 SHOWN, 5 LISTED). |
| | 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE ROOFTOP |
| | TERRACE LOCATED AT THE 6TH LEVEL ACCORDING TO DAC |
| | SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
