| Date |
Text |
| 2013-01-02 11:08:39 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 01.02.2012 |
| | PROJECT NO.:Z12110020 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1171GG |
| | ADDRESS: 1560 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: STEVE MEIER |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 214.632.9611 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: PROPOSED FIRESTONE AUTO CARE FACILITY. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. WRITTEN RESPONSES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALL COMMENTS |
| | ISSUED AT THE DECEMBER 12, 2012 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW |
| | COMMITTEE MEETING. |
| | |
| | 2. ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED. I |
| | DID NOT RECEIVE ELECTRONIC COPIES OF THE PLAN SHOWING |
| | THE TURNING RADII |
| | |
| | 3. REPEAT COMMENT - A CURRENT TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | APPROVAL LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 4. REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE A |
| | MEETING WITH THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (KIMBERLY |
| | MITCHELL), AS WELL AS COMMUNICATE WITH THE ROOSEVELT |
| | ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS. |
| | |
| | 5. REPEAT COMMENT - A LETTER OF NO OBJECTION SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FROM THE FOLLOWING UTILITY COMPANIES: |
| | |
| | A. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | |
| | 6. IN THE SITE DATA TABLE... |
| | |
| | A. PLEASE INDICATE THE AMOUNT OF EACH ITEM REQUIRED, IN |
| | ADDITION TO WHAT IS PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS DATED |
| | DECEMBER 12, 2012 FOR THE REQUIRED AMOUNTS. |
| | B. THE PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 40%. PLEASE NOTE THAT OPEN SPACE IS THE LOT AREA MINUS |
| | THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. |
| | C. THE TABLE SHOWS AN FAR OF 1.0. WITH A BUILDING |
| | COVERAGE OF 17%, THE FAR SHOWN IS INCORRECT. 1.0 IS THE |
| | MAXIMUM FAR ALLOWED WITHIN THE ZONING DESIGNATION. |
| | D. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL PERCENTAGES TO ONE (1) DECIMAL |
| | POINT, OR ROUND TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER. FOR |
| | EXAMPLE, IF ROUNDING, THE BUILDING COVERAGE SHOULD BE |
| | 18%, ETC. |
| | |
| | 7. IT APPEARS THAT THE AREA PREVIOUSLY LABELED AS |
| | "LANDSCAPE PAVERS" HAS BEEN CONVERTED INTO REGULAR |
| | ASPHALT. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THIS AREA IS SO LARGE IN |
| | SIZE. FOR SUFFICIENT BACK-OUT, A "NOTCH" OF ONLY 3-5 |
| | FEET IS NECESSARY. WITH THE EXCESSIVE ASPHALT, THIS ARE |
| | MIGHT BE CONFUSED AS ADDITIONAL PARKING. PLEASE MODIFY |
| | THIS PORTION OF THE PARKING AREA, OR EXPLAIN THE |
| | NECESSITY OF THE ADDITIONAL ASPHALT AREA. |
| | |
| | 8. REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE NOTE THAT LIGHTING LEVELS |
| | SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE |
| | BOUNDARY OF THE CPD. IF NO PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS PROVIDED |
| | AT THIS TIME, SUCH PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED AT PERMITTING |
| | AT SHALL COMPLY WITH THIS PROVISION. |
| | |
| | 9. REPEAT COMMENT - THE DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET PA4 IS TOO LARGE FOR THAT AREA SHOWN ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN. THE DETAIL SHOWS A MONUMENT SIGN THAT IS |
| | 15'4" IN WIDTH, WHILE THE AREA BETWEEN THE DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURE AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS ONLY 11' IN |
| | WIDTH. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 10. REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, AS WELL AS A DETAIL. ALL DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURES SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM CRITERIA PROVIDED IN |
| | SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). |
| | |
| | 11. THE STRIPING FOR THE AISLE BETWEEN THE ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES AND THE FRONT ENTRANCE SHALL BE WHITE, |
| | NOT YELLOW (SEE PARKING STALL DETAIL). |
| | |
| | 12. PLEASE INCLUDE THE BIKE RACK DETAIL ONTO THE SITE |
| | PLAN, OR CREATE AN ADDITIONAL SHEET THAT INCORPORATES |
| | ALL DETAILS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 13. REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE PROVIDE A HEIGHT AND/OR |
| | DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED SCREEN WALL ON THE EAST SIDE OF |
| | THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 14. REPEAT COMMENT - BE SURE THE LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE |
| | INDICATES ALL STATISTICAL INFORMATION TO SATISFY |
| | ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS. FOR EXAMPLE... |
| | |
| | A. 1 SHADE TREE FOR EACH 1,600 SQ. FT. OF OPEN SPACE |
| | B. 1 FLOWERING TREE FOR EACH 6,400 SQ. FT. OF OPEN |
| | SPACE |
| | C. 1 SHRUB FOR EACH 500 SQ. FT. OF OPEN SPACE |
| | |
| | 15. REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY A MAXIMUM OF |
| | 35% OF THE REQUIRED SHADE OR FLOWERING TREES MAY BE |
| | SUBSTITUTED WITH PALMS. PLEASE PROVIDE A CALCULATION |
| | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH. IF SHADE OR FLOWERING |
| | TREES ARE BEING SUBSTITUTED WITH PALMS, THEY SHALL BE |
| | DONE AT A RATIO OF 2 PALM TREES FOR EACH |
| | SHADE/FLOWERING TREE, UNLESS IT IS A ROYAL PALM OR |
| | SUCKERING PALM SUCH AS ARECA PALM, PAUROTIS PALM, AND |
| | THE SENEGAL DATE PALM. IF A SUBSTITUTION IS MADE, PALMS |
| | ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PLANTED IN CLUSTERS OF THREE (3), |
| | WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE THOSE LISTED PREVIOUSLY. |
| | |
| | 16. REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS BEING DONE |
| | WITH THE EXISTING CATCH BASINS, ETC. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | THEY WILL BE LOCATED IN AREAS OF FUTURE LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLANDS. IF THEY ARE TO REMAIN, PLEASE SHOW ALL |
| | UTILITIES ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS TO ENSURE THERE |
| | ARE NO CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 17. PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL I HAD SENT ON JULY 26, 2012, |
| | COMMENTING ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT... |
| | |
| | A. CANVAS AWNINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS OPPOSED TO METAL |
| | AWNINGS IN ORDER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF |
| | THE OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1435 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1459 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
