| Date |
Text |
| 2012-08-17 18:57:02 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | PLANNING DIVISION |
| | |
| | |
| | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE |
| | JULY 11, 2012 |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL (1): JULY 19, 2012 |
| | |
| | MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE MIZNER LAKES APARTMENT |
| | RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | PB 1171FF |
| | |
| | A REQUEST BY BRIAN CHEGUIS/DONALDSON HEARING, OF |
| | COTLEUR & HEARING, INC., ON BEHALF OF AARON DRIVE |
| | HOLDINGS, LLC FOR A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE MIZNER LAKES |
| | APARTMENTS RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (?RPD?) TO |
| | BUILD APARTMENT BUILDINGS FOR MULTIFAMILY USE |
| | CONSISTING OF 548 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. |
| | |
| | P.C.N. 74-43-43-17-25-002-0000 |
| | 715 HANK AARON DRIVE |
| | |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY |
| | ALL DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING. |
| | NOTE THAT RESUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | B. 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/ JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT/ PLANS: |
| | |
| | 2. THE APPLICANT SHOULD MEET WITH THE APPROPRIATE |
| | NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONER TO |
| | INFORM THEM OF THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AS PART OF THE REVIEW PROCESS AND NOTIFY |
| | PLANNING STAFF OF THE OUTCOME OF THE MEETING AND ANY |
| | ISSUES THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL: THE APPLICANT INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD BE |
| | SENDING AN INFORMATIONAL PACKET AND WILL PROVIDE |
| | WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT ALL NEIGHBORHOOD |
| | ASSOCIATIONS WITHIN THE SURROUNDING VICINITY WERE |
| | CONTACTED. THE APPLICANT WAS ADVISED THAT STAFF NEEDS |
| | FEEDBACK FROM APPLICANT OF COMMENTS OR CONCERNS THE |
| | ASSOCIATIONS MAY HAVE ABOUT THE PROJECT, PRIOR TO |
| | TAKING THE ITEM TO PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE ITEMS BELOW WERE REQUIRED AT TIME OF APPLICATION |
| | SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE ALL THE UTILITY LETTERS. THE |
| | APPLICATION MAY NOT MOVE FORWARD TO PLANNING BOARD |
| | UNTIL ALL COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED AND THE PLANNING |
| | DEPARTMENT RECEIVES ALL LETTERS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: N. CITY SERVICE AND PUBLIC |
| | UTILITY LETTERS |
| | |
| | A PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT |
| | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE |
| | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: |
| | |
| | TELEPHONE: |
| | ROBERT LOWEN |
| | AT&T FLORIDA - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT |
| | 2021 SOUTH MILITARY TRAIL ? WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA |
| | 33415 |
| | PHONE: (561) 357.6615 ? FAX: (561) 964.3499 EMAIL: |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | NATURAL GAS: |
| | NANI SANTIAGO |
| | FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | 1641 WORTHINGTON RD SUITE 220 - WEST PALM BEACH, FL |
| | 33409 |
| | PHONE: (561) 838.1785 GENERAL PHONE: (561) 832.2461 |
| | FAX: (561) 838.1769 (EASEMENT CONSENT FORMS CAN BE |
| | FAXED) EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | ELECTRIC SERVICE: |
| | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY |
| | 810 CHARLOTTE AVENUE WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 |
| | |
| | THE FP&L PROJECT MANAGER (INCLUDING NAME AND TELEPHONE |
| | NUMBER) FOR THE PROJECT'S LOCATION MAY BE FOUND BY |
| | VISITING THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE: |
| | |
| | HTTP://APP.FPL.COM/NAPPS/PS/SERVICEM.NSF/FPLWEB+SEARCH+ |
| | SIMPLE-OPENFORM |
| | |
| | TELEVISION CABLE: |
| | WADE HAGERTY |
| | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS |
| | 10435 IRONWOOD ROAD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 |
| | PHONE: (561) 227-4127 FAX: (561) 640-0231 - EMAIL: |
| | [email protected] |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL: COMMENT IS STILL OUTSTANDING |
| | |
| | 4. SHEET A0.01 AND A1.01 PARKING CALCULATIONS: |
| | |
| | A. PURSUANT TO SECTION THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS (ZLDR), SECTION 94-486, TABLE XV-6, |
| | RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY, ONE (1) PARKING SPACE IS |
| | REQUIRED PER EVERY 10 UNITS FOR GUESTS. THEREFORE, FOR |
| | 548 UNITS, 55 GUEST PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. 1,058 |
| | REGULAR PARKING + 55 GUEST SPACES = 1113 PARKING |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL: DOES NOT COMPLY, HOWEVER, APPLICANT |
| | RE-SUBMITTED ON AUGUST 6, 2012 AND AUGUST 17, 2012 A |
| | PARKING WAIVER JUSTIFICATION AND PEDESTRIAN PROXIMITY |
| | PLAN. STAFF HAS INDICATED SOME ITEMS THAT WILL NEED TO |
| | BE ADDRESSED IN THE PLANS TO JUSTIFY WAIVER OF THE |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE, THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES 1,077 PARKING |
| | HAVE BEEN PROVIDED INCLUDING 32 ON-STREET PARKING |
| | SPACES, SEE COMMENT (B) BELOW AND REVISE ALL |
| | DOCUMENTATION TO MATCH ACCORDINGLY. |
| | B. ADDITIONALLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485 (O), 20 HC |
| | SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR UP TO 1,000 REGULAR SPACES, |
| | PLUS ONE (1) HC SPACE FOR EACH 100 OVER 1,000. |
| | THEREFORE, 21 HC ARE REQUIRED NOT 20. THE SITE PLAN |
| | SHOWS 30 HC PROVIDED ON THE SITE DATA, BUT THE PLANS |
| | SHOW ONLY 26 HC? PLEASE CLARIFY. ALSO, SUGGEST |
| | RELOCATING AND/OR ADDING HC SPACE(S) AT THE SOUTHWEST |
| | CORNER OF THE PROJECT, SINCE THERE ARE NO HC SPACES |
| | PROPOSED IN THAT AREA TO SERVE BUILDING 4, TYPE A OR |
| | BUILDING 16, TYPE E. |
| | |
| | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT AN ADDITIONAL |
| | 32 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED THAT ARE |
| | LOCATED ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDE OF HANK AARON, THE |
| | ONLY PARKING AVAILABLE THAT CAN BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE |
| | PROJECT'S REQUIREMENTS IS THE ON-STREET PARKING ON THE |
| | EAST SIDE OF HANK AARON, WHICH IS ADJACENT TO THE |
| | FRONTAGE OF THE PROJECT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 16 PARKING |
| | SPACES VS. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NOTED AS 32 PARKING |
| | SPACES. REVISE ALL DOCUMENTATION TO CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 5. SHEET A1.01 - SITE PLAN, INCLUDES THE SITE DATA WITH |
| | 10 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AND NO REQUIREMENT |
| | FOR BICYCLE PARKING, WHICH IS INCORRECT; SHEET A0.01, |
| | PROJECT DATA DOES NOT DENOTE ANY BICYCLE PARKING. ALSO, |
| | ON SHEET A1.01, THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY BICYCLE |
| | PARKING. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485(Q), ONE (1) BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE |
| | PARKING SPACES, OR FRACTION THEREOF, REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | USE. THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE SPREAD |
| | THROUGHOUT THE SHOPPING PLAZA. SHOW A DETAIL OF |
| | PROPOSED AREAS. THE BICYCLE RACK(S) SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | THE DESIGN STANDARDS SET FORTH. A LINK OF ACCEPTABLE |
| | BICYCLE RACKS WITH DETAILS AND MINIMUM DIMENSIONS WILL |
| | BE PROVIDED VIA EMAIL FOR YOUR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL: BIKE DETAILS DO NOT COMPLY WITH ACCEPTIBLE |
| | BICYCLE STANDARDS AS DISCUSSED AND PROVIDED BY STAFF ON |
| | 8/21/12. REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. INCLUDE BICYCLE |
| | PARKING/RACKS PAD DETAIL AND DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATE |
| | WITH ARCHITECT/ENGINEER THE LOCATIONS WITH CLOSE |
| | PROXIMITY TO BUILDINGS TO MAKE SURE THERE IS ADEQUATE |
| | CLEARANCE FOR THE BICYCLES TO PARK. |
| | COORDINATE AMOUNT OF BICYCLE PARKING AND RACKS BETWEEN |
| | ALL PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW 7 BICYCLE PARKING |
| | SPACES PER RACK VS. SHEET A5.03 WHICH SHOWS A DIFFERENT |
| | NUMBER. |
| | |
| | 6. SHOW DIMENSION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT |
| | IDENTIFICATION SIGN THAT MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | SECTION 94-407 (2): |
| | |
| | B.2. THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FEET PER FACE OF A SIGN IS 48 |
| | SQUARE FEET, SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET FROM |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE; |
| | F. MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS FOUR (4) FEET; THE SIGN PROPOSED |
| | IS AT 9 FEET. IS A WAIVER REQUESTED FOR THE ADDITIONAL |
| | HEIGHT? |
| | |
| | 7. SHEET 3 "PAVING AND DRAINAGE" LOWER THE HC PAINTED |
| | LOGO TO LEAVE 2 FEET FROM BOTTOM OF LOGO TO THE BOTTOM |
| | OF PARKING STALL STRIPPING. THE DETAIL SHOWS 16 INCHES |
| | BETWEEN CENTER PARKING STALL PAINTING DETAIL, AND |
| | STALLS BEING 9 FEET WIDE. APPLICANT MAY CONSIDER |
| | REDUCING TO THE MINIMUM ZLDR DIMENSIONS OF 12 INCHES |
| | BETWEEN CENTER OF STRIPING AND 8'-6" WIDE TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE MORE PARKING SPACES, SINCE THE PROPOSED |
| | SITE PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING SPACES |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8. THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW A SIDE PRIVACY WALL, |
| | BUT THE CIVIL DENOTES A FENCE? PLEASE CLARIFY. ALSO, |
| | THE DETAIL PLAN FOR THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FEATURES |
| | SHOWS A CURVED GATE, THE PLANS SHOW A STRAIGHT LINE, |
| | DEPICT ON SITE PLAN, THE CURVATURE TO ASSURE IT IS |
| | WITHIN THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 10. PRIOR TO THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE ALTERATION AND |
| | BUILDING PERMIT, PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION WITH A REVISED PLAN OF THE EXISTING |
| | TREES TO REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED, SINCE THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS NOTE THAT A |
| | TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES COULD NOT BE PERFORMED |
| | UNTIL THE LAND IS CLEARED OF EXCESSIVE OVERGROWTH OF |
| | VEGETATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL (1): OUTSTANDING COMMENT TO BE ADDRESSED |
| | PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF BUILDING (LANDSCAPE) PERMIT. |
| | APPLICANT INDICATED THAT THE FINAL DESTINATION OF |
| | RELOCATED TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED ONCE OVERGROWTH IS |
| | REMOVED AND THE EXACT DEMEANOR OF THE NATIVE TREE CAN |
| | BE MORE ACCURATELY DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 11. SHEET LP-1, LANDSCAPE DATA, SHOW WHAT LANDSCAPING |
| | IS "PROVIDED" ON THE TABLE. THE "REQUIRED" PART IS THE |
| | ONLY ITEMS SHOWN. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED AND PROVIDED |
| | IS FOR THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PROPERTY, THE |
| | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ON THE LAKE PATH CANNOT BE |
| | COUNTED TOWARDS THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. A SEPARATE |
| | TABULATION FOR THAT AREA SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL: PER MEETING DISCUSSION , PROVIDE DETAILS, |
| | INCLUDING CROSS SECTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON |
| | CITY PROPERTY (AKA TURQUOISE NECKLACE) FOR STAFF REVIEW |
| | (SIDEWALK, WALL, LANDSCAPING, BENCHES, ETC.). FINAL |
| | APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPING AND DESIGN IS CONTINGENT ON |
| | APPROVAL BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND |
| | PERTINENT DEPARTMENTS REGARDING USAGE OF CITY PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 12. THE "TABULAR TREE LIST", IS THAT WHAT IS EXISTING? |
| | UNDER STATUS, IS "TBD" (TO BE DETERMINED), WHETHER TO |
| | REMAIN OR RELOCATE? PLEASE CLARIFY AND NOTE COMMENT |
| | NUMBER 8 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL (1): OUTSTANDING COMMENT TO BE ADDRESSED |
| | PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF BUILDING (LANDSCAPE) PERMIT. |
| | APPLICANT INDICATED THAT THE FINAL DESTINATION OF |
| | RELOCATED TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED ONCE OVERGROWTH IS |
| | REMOVED AND THE EXACT DEMEANOR OF THE NATIVE TREE CAN |
| | BE MORE ACCURATELY DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 13. SHEET LD-6 OF 6 - SHOW A DETAIL PROVIDING A ROOT |
| | BARRIER SYSTEM FOR THE CANOPY TREES, FOR INSTANCE, THE |
| | LIVE OAKS (QV) PROPOSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING LOTS, |
| | ETC. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THEIR ROOT SYSTEM, IT IS |
| | STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO AVOID FUTURE ISSUES WITH THE |
| | TREE'S ROOT SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL (1): THERE ARE SOME AREAS WITHIN THE PLANS |
| | THAT MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW DUE TO CLOSE |
| | PROXIMITY TO A STRUCTURE/INFRASTRUCTURE, I.E. DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURES, ETC. STAFF HAS DISCUSSED SOME AREAS DURING |
| | MEETINGS WITH APPLICANT (BRIAN CHEGUIS). |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME. |
| | |
| | LINDA MIA FRANCO, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1443 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1459 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
