| Date |
Text |
| 2012-11-28 10:25:05 | CASE NO. PB 891R |
| | PALM BEACH OUTLETS FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW |
| | 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD |
| | 4TH SUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL REVISED PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (DECEMBER 15, 2012), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 1) THE DATA FOR THE FOUNDATION PLANTING AT THE |
| | PERIMETER OF THE OUTLET CENTER DIFFERS ON SHEETS LPC |
| | AND LP-10. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT AMONG |
| | THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY IF ALL OF THE EXFILTRATION |
| | DRAIN VS. TREE PLACEMENT CONFLICTS HAVE BEEN RESOLVED |
| | SINCE THE EXFILTRATION LAYER IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEETS |
| | LP-5, LP-6, LP-7 AND LP-8. ADDITIONALLY, WHY IS THE |
| | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYER SHOWN ON HALF OF THE SITE |
| | PLANS? THE LAYER SHOULD EITHER BE ON ALL OR NONE OF THE |
| | SITE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLAND WITH TWO GUMBO LIMBO TREES IN PBA #1 WHICH |
| | APPEARS TO HAVE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH CONSTRUCTED |
| | UNDER THE ISLAND. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT - THE EXFILTRATION LINES ON SHEET |
| | LP-4 THAT CURRENTLY RUN UNDER THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS |
| | SHALL BE REDESIGNED SO THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT NOW |
| | THAT THE TREES HAVE BEEN MOVED TO THEIR PROPER |
| | LOCATIONS IN THE TERMINAL ISLANDS. THE STORMWATER |
| | ENGINEER HAS STATED THAT THE LINES CAN BE INSTALLED TO |
| | AVOID THE TERMINAL ISLANDS. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT - THE BAYS OPPOSITE THE OPENINGS TO |
| | THE SERVICE BAYS SHALL HAVE THEIR DOORS PLACED SUCH |
| | THAT THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE OPENING. THE |
| | REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE FOUNDATION PERMIT SHOW |
| | DOORS NOT ONLY ON THE NORTH AND WEST SIDES AT THE |
| | OPENING, BUT NOW ADDITIONALLY SHOW DOORS OPPOSITE THE |
| | OPENING FOR THE SOUTHERN SERVICE BAYS. THE EASTERN |
| | SERVICE BAY SHOWS A RELOCATED HALLWAY WHICH COULD BE |
| | POSITIONED DIFFERENTLY AND THE DOOR ISSUES WOULD NOT |
| | EXIST IN THIS SERVICE BAY. |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM |
| | PALM TRAN THAT THE DESIGN OF THE TRANSFER FACILITY IS |
| | ACCEPTABLE. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER HEDGES OR GROUND COVER |
| | PLANTING IN THE 2.6 FOOT WIDE NON-SIDEWALK AREA |
| | ADJACENT TO THE BUS SHELTERS ALONG THE CHASE PARCEL TO |
| | PROVIDE A VISUAL BUFFER, NOT JUST SOD WITH THE TREES. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PARKING SPACE LAYER IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET FSP-5. |
| | |
| | 8) H. THE PARK AND RIDE/CARPOOL SIGN INCLUDED WITH THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE PARK AND RIDE TEXT |
| | SHALL BE MORE PROMINENT AND THE PALM BEACH OUTLETS TEXT |
| | SHALL BE LESS PROMINENT. STAFF SUPPORTED THE INITIAL |
| | CONCEPT DRAWING PRESENTED TO STAFF IN AN E-MAIL ON |
| | SEPTEMBER 23, 2012. |
| | |
| | 9) THE MATCH LINE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SHEET LP-5 |
| | SHOULD REFERENCE SHEET LP-6 NOT SHEET LP-7. |
| | |
| | 10) ONE OF THE PARKING SPACES ON SHEET FSP-5 IS MISSING |
| | A WHEEL STOP. |
| | |
| | 11) SHEET FSP-6 INCLUDES A PARKING ROW LABELED WITH |
| | NINE PARKING SPACES WHEN ONLY EIGHT EXIST. THE PARKING |
| | TABLE SHALL BE ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | 12) THE CROSSWALK WEST OF THE PALM TRAN FACILITY SHOWN |
| | ON SHEET FSP-4 DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE SIDEWALK RAMPS. |
| | |
| | 13) STAFF HAS COMPARED THE SUBMITTED FORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | (FSP) TO THE MOST RECENT SET OF CIVIL PLANS, DATED |
| | SEPTEMBER 21, 2012, SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND FOUND NUMEROUS DISCREPANCIES |
| | AMONG THE PLANS, AS LISTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | A. THE FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS DIFFER ON MANY SHEETS. |
| | THIS INCLUDES RELOCATED AND NEW HYDRANTS NOT SHOWN ON |
| | THE FSP. |
| | |
| | B. SIDEWALKS ARE NOT IN THE SAME LOCATIONS, TO INCLUDE |
| | THE CIVIL PLANS NOT SHOWING THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS |
| | BETWEEN PBA #1 AND PBA #2A. INTERIOR ISLAND AND |
| | LANDSCAPE IS AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | C. THERE ARE SERVICE COURT ENTRANCES WHICH ARE IN |
| | DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | D. THE OUTLETS BUILDINGS ARE SHOWN WITH DIFFERING |
| | FOOTPRINTS AND SQUARE FOOTAGE AMOUNTS BETWEEN THE TWO |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | E. THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW ALL OF THE PARKING AND LOADING |
| | BEING CONSTRUCTED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AT THIS TIME. |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FSP AND VIOLATES THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | F. THE PAVING PLAN SPECIFIES THAT ALL OF THE AREAS |
| | SHOWN AS DECORATIVE PAVERS ON THE FSP WILL BE EITHER |
| | ASPHALT OR CONCRETE. |
| | |
| | G. THE DIAMOND TREE CUT OUTS REMAIN ON SHEETS C 403 AND |
| | C 404 AFTER HAVING BEEN REMOVED ON THE FSP. |
| | |
| | H. THE BICYCLE RACKS, WHICH ARE PERMITTED UNDER THE |
| | CIVIL PLANS, ARE NOT SHOWN FOR THE OUTLET BUILDINGS. |
| | FURTHERMORE, THE BICYCLE RACKS AND PAD DETAILS ARE |
| | SHOWN AS THE WAVE MODEL, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE |
| | CITY. |
| | |
| | I. THERE IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN DIFFERENT |
| | LOCATIONS AMONG THE PLANS, WHICH AFFECTS THE LANDSCAPE |
| | DESIGN. AN EXAMPLE IS THE LIFT STATION ALONG CONGRESS |
| | AVENUE, EAST OF PBA #3. FURTHERMORE, THE PLACEMENT OF |
| | THE LIFT STATION HAS REPLACED THE REQUIRED INTERIOR |
| | ISLAND TREE, WHICH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | |
| | J. THE CHANGES TO THE AREA AROUND THE PALM TRAN |
| | FACILITY (NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES) ARE NOT REFLECTED |
| | ON THE CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | K. THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW A CHAIN LINK FENCE AROUND THE |
| | CANAL IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. THE FSP DOES |
| | NOT SHOW A FENCE IN THIS LOCATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | DESIGN GUIDELINES PROHIBIT CHAIN LINK FENCES WITHIN THE |
| | PALM BEACH OUTLETS CPD. |
| | |
| | L. THE CIVIL PLANS, PRESUMABLY WHAT WILL BE USED TO |
| | PHYSICALLY CONSTRUCT THE SITE, DO NOT INCLUDE ANY |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, THE DIVIDER |
| | MEDIANS, ETC. DIMENSIONS, AS LISTED ON THE FSP, SHALL |
| | BE INCLUDED ON THE CIVIL PLANS SO THAT THE SITE WILL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 14) THE WHEEL STOPS INCLUDED WITH THE CIVIL DETAILS DO |
| | NOT COMPLY WITH FIGURE XIV-2 OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 15) THE PLANS MENTION THAT THE 60 FOOT DRAINAGE |
| | EASEMENT WILL BE ABANDONED, YET PROOF OF THIS HAS NOT |
| | BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| |
Print |
