| Date |
Text |
| 2013-06-14 16:09:34 | 1. SP-1. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT |
| | INCLUDES A BICYCLE RACK PARKING MODEL THAT IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN DOES |
| | NOT INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA WHERE THE BIKE |
| | PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE AMEND TO |
| | SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE A BIKE RACK PARKING MODEL |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING |
| | GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE |
| | APPLICANT SEPARATELY AND PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA WHERE THE BIKE |
| | PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS A BIKE |
| | PARKING PAD DETAIL. |
| | RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY |
| | WITH THE GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: WHILE THE REVISED SITE PLAN DOES INCLUDE |
| | A BIKE RACK MODEL CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S |
| | GUIDELINES, THE SITE PLAN WAS NOT REVISED TO INCLUDE |
| | THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREAS WHERE THE BIKE RACKS |
| | ARE PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. IN ADDITION, THE REVISED |
| | SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE A BIKE PARKING PAD DETAIL. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT |
| | THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA AND THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | BIKE RACKS WITHIN THE PAD ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE BIKE |
| | PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE |
| | APPLICANT AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL COMMENT. |
| | RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY |
| | WITH THE GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 2. SP-1. THE SITE DATA TABLE CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES |
| | THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AS |
| | WELL AS THE PROPOSED DIMENSIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE |
| | THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS ROS, PLEASE |
| | REPLACE THE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE STANDARDS IN THE |
| | TABLE WITH THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR THE ROS |
| | ZONING DISTRICT. |
| | RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT |
| | THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR ROS ZONING DISTRICT. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 3. SP-1. ALONG THE 45TH AND PARKE AVENUE FRONTAGES, THE |
| | SITE INDICATES THAT A 4? CHAIN LINK FENCE WILL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE CHAIN LINK FENCE |
| | ON THESE TWO SIDES BE VINYL COATED. |
| | RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT |
| | THE VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCES. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. SP-1. THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED |
| | TURN AROUND SPACE IN ADDITION TO THE TURN ASSIST AREA. |
| | PLEASE AMEND THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. |
| | RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE TURNAROUND |
| | SPACE. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE ALL THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE |
| | TURNAROUND SPACE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE REVISED SITE |
| | PLAN. THE SITE PLAN DOES SHOW THE LENGTH OF THE SPACE |
| | (18 FT.) BUT IT DOES NOT SHOW ITS WIDTH. |
| | RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE DIMENSIONS |
| | OF THE TURNAROUND SPACE. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. SP-1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS |
| | PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. IF ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS |
| | BEING PROPOSED PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR |
| | THIS SITE. ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF |
| | OPERATION OF BOTH THE PARK AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER. |
| | RESPONSE: A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH |
| | THE RESUBMITTAL. THE PARK WILL BE OPEN SUNRISE TO |
| | SUNSET. AT THIS TIME IT IS TOO EARLY TO DETERMINE THE |
| | HOURS THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER WILL BE OPEN, HOWEVER |
| | THERE WILL BE NIGHTTIME ACTIVITIES. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: SHEET PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING |
| | NOTE: |
| | |
| | "LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS |
| | PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH" |
| | |
| | "ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY |
| | NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6 |
| | FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB |
| | AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL |
| | INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC AND PRIVATE |
| | SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED. |
| | THE MAXIMUM MEASURE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1.0 |
| | FOOTCANDLE." |
| | |
| | PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE ABOVE REQUIREMENT DOES NOT |
| | COME FROM THE CITY'S ZONING CODE OR BUILDING CODE. THE |
| | ONLY LIGHTING REQUIREMENT IN THE ZONING CODE THAT WOULD |
| | BE APPLICABLE TO THIS SITE IS INCLUDED IN SECTION |
| | 94-310(D) AND STATES THAT "ANY OPERATION OR ACTIVITY |
| | PRODUCING GLARE SHALL BE CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR |
| | INDIRECT LIGHT FROM THE SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE |
| | ILLUMINATION IN EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES WHEN |
| | MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT." |
| | |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THE SOURCE OF THE NOTE INCLUDED IN SHEET |
| | PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND AMEND THE NOTE |
| | CURRENTLY REFERENCED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO REFLECT |
| | THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE ZONING CODE. |
| | RESPONSE: THE NOTE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND REPLACED WITH A NOTE THAT STATES: |
| | "PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE SECTION |
| | 94-310(D) (SHEET 2) |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 6. SP-1. FOR THE SOUTHWEST 4 PARKING SPACES, STAFF |
| | SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW |
| | THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE |
| | AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH FOR THE PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT |
| | MAY BE PLANTED IN THE OVERHANG AREA. IF THE OVERHANG IS |
| | NOT USED, THEN BOTH CURB AND WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED AND EXECUTED AS SUGGESTED. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE A PARKING DETAIL IN THE |
| | SITE PLAN THAT REFLECTS THIS PARKING SPACE |
| | CONFIGURATION. |
| | RESPONSE: THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW THE |
| | ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE DETAIL. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 7. SP-1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE |
| | STRIPING ON THE PARKING DETAIL. THE CITY REQUIRES 12 |
| | INCHES BETWEEN THE STRIPES. |
| | RESPONSE: THE PARKING DETAIL HAS BEEN REVISED TO |
| | REFLECT THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE STRIPING. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 8. LP-1. PLEASE AMEND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE A TREE |
| | AT THE END OF THE PARKING ROW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | PARKING LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. |
| | THESE CHANGES MAY RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OF THE CATCH |
| | BASIN PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE |
| | PARKING LOT. |
| | RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 9. LP-1. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED CATCH |
| | BASIN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED LIVE OAK |
| | TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CHILDREN?S PLAY AREA IN ORDER |
| | TO PREVENT A POTENTIAL FUTURE CONFLICT. |
| | RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 10. LP-1. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LIVES OAKS ALONG THE LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE |
| | EXISTING PREMIERE PARK OF COMMERCE BUFFER TREES. |
| | RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 11. NEW COMMENT LP-1. UNDER THE LANDSCAPE DATA, PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY IF THE 26 PALMS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN ARE |
| | BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES, |
| | OR WHETHER THEY ARE SUBSTITUTING FOR REQUIRED SHADE |
| | TREES. IF THE PALMS ARE BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO |
| | THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES, THEN THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO |
| | THE 35% MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION REQUIREMENT AS THE |
| | LANDSCAPE DATA APPEARS TO INDICATE. |
| | RESPONSE: THE LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO CLARIFY THIS |
| | COMMENT |
| | |
| | CITY COMMENT: THE APPLICANT'S REVISED LANDSCAPE DATA |
| | TABLE IN LP-1 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY REFERENCE TO THE 26 |
| | PALMS WHICH ARE REFLECTED IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE |
| | APPLICANT NEEDS TO REFLECT THESE PALMS IN THE LANDSCAPE |
| | DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
