| Date |
Text |
| 2012-04-09 15:41:53 | Z12020015 PB 1620 FLU AMENDMENT Z12020016 PB 1620A |
| | REZONING |
| | 1) THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A FUTURE LAND USE |
| | AMENDMENT FROM CONSERVATION (CON) TO COMMUNITY SERVICE |
| | (CS) FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 6.11 ACRES OF LAND AND A |
| | REZONING OF ONE OF THE TWO PARCELS TOTALING 1.89 ACRES |
| | FROM CONSERVATION (CON) TO RECREATION & OPEN SPACE |
| | (ROS). THIS PROPOSAL WOULD RESULT IN A 4.22 ACRE PARCEL |
| | WITH A CS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND A CON ZONING |
| | DESIGNATION. TABLE I-1 OF ARTICLE 1 OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS INDICATES THAT A CS FUTURE |
| | LAND USE AND CON ZONING DESIGNATION ARE INCOMPATIBLE. |
| | AS A RESULT, THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE REVISED TO |
| | EITHER: A) HAVE BOTH PARCELS BE SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSED |
| | LAND USE AMENDMENT TO CS AND THE REZONING TO ROS, OR B) |
| | HAVE ONLY THE 1.89 ACRE PARCEL BE SUBJECT TO THE |
| | PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING. |
| | |
| | 2) THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A TRAFFIC STATEMENT FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENT FOR THE 1.89 ACRE PARCEL, |
| | BUT NOT FOR THE OVERALL 6.11 ACRE SITE. BASED ON THE |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT, IF THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO PURSUE A |
| | LAND USE AMENDMENT FOR THE PARCELS TOTALING 6.11 ACRES |
| | THEN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WOULD NEED TO BE REVISED TO |
| | EVALUATE BOTH PARCELS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT DOES |
| | NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A LAND USE AMENDMENT |
| | TRAFFIC REPORT CONSISTENT WITH COUNTY LAND USE POLICY |
| | 3.5-D. THE TRAFFIC REPORT NEEDS TO COMPARE THE TRAFFIC |
| | IMPACTS OF THE MOST TRAFFIC INTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT |
| | POTENTIAL PERMITTED UNDER THE CONSERVATION FLU |
| | DESIGNATION VERSUS THAT PERMITTED UNDER THE CS |
| | DESIGNATION. ALSO, THE ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE PERFORMED |
| | FOR BOTH THE EXISTING YEAR AND FOR THE LONG RANGE |
| | PLANNING HORIZON. IF THE APPLICANT WISHES TO RESTRICT |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED UNDER THE PROPOSED CS LAND |
| | USE DESIGNATION THEN THE LAND USE AMENDMENT MUST BE |
| | CONDITIONED TO THOSE SPECIFIC USES AND INTENSITIES |
| | REQUESTED BY THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT?S LAND USE |
| | AMENDMENT TRAFFIC STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE REVISED |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 4) THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE A SUMMARY TABLE OF |
| | LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) IMPACTS FOR THE SERVICE |
| | PROVIDERS. |
| | |
| | Z12020018 ZBA 3290 |
| | 1) SP-1. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT |
| | INCLUDES A BICYCLE RACK PARKING MODEL THAT IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN DOES |
| | NOT INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA WHERE THE BIKE |
| | PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE AMEND TO |
| | SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE A BIKE RACK PARKING MODEL |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING |
| | GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE |
| | APPLICANT SEPARATELY AND PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA WHERE THE BIKE |
| | PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS A BIKE |
| | PARKING PAD DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 2) SP-1. THE SITE DATA TABLE CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES |
| | THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AS |
| | WELL AS THE PROPOSED DIMENSIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE |
| | THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS ROS, PLEASE |
| | REPLACE THE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE STANDARDS IN THE |
| | TABLE WITH THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR THE ROS |
| | ZONING DISTRICT. |
| | |
| | 3) SP-1. ALONG THE 45TH AND PARKE AVENUE FRONTAGES, THE |
| | SITE INDICATES THAT A 4? CHAINLINK FENCE WILL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE CHAINLINK FENCE ON |
| | THESE TWO SIDES BE VINYL COATED. |
| | |
| | 4) SP-1. THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED |
| | TURN AROUND SPACE IN ADDITION TO THE TURN ASSIST AREA. |
| | PLEASE AMEND THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 5) SP-1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS |
| | PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. IF ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS |
| | BEING PROPOSED PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR |
| | THIS SITE. ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF |
| | OPERATION OF BOTH THE PARK AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER. |
| | |
| | 6) SP-1. FOR THE SOUTHWEST 4 PARKING SPACES, STAFF |
| | SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW |
| | THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE |
| | AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH FOR THE PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT |
| | MAY BE PLANTED IN THE OVERHANG AREA. IF THE OVERHANG IS |
| | NOT USED, THEN BOTH CURB AND WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7) SP-1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE |
| | STRIPING ON THE PARKING DETAIL. THE CITY REQUIRES 12 |
| | INCHES BETWEEN THE STRIPES. |
| | |
| | 8) LP-1. PLEASE AMEND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE A TREE |
| | AT THE END OF THE PARKING ROW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | PARKING LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. |
| | THESE CHANGES MAY RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OF THE CATCH |
| | BASIN PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE |
| | PARKING LOT. |
| | |
| | 9) LP-1. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED CATCH |
| | BASIN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED LIVE OAK |
| | TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CHILDREN?S PLAY AREA IN ORDER |
| | TO PREVENT A POTENTIAL FUTURE CONFICT. |
| | |
| | 10) LP-1. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LIVES OAKS ALONG THE LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE |
| | EXISTING PREMIERE PARK OF COMMERCE BUFFER TREES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONTACT ALEX HANSEN, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER AT |
| | 561-822-146 OR [email protected] IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
