| Date |
Text |
| 2011-11-09 11:21:03 | CASE NO. 1616 - FLU AMENDMENT |
| | 8111 SOUTH DIXIE COMMERCIAL |
| | 8111 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .WORD FORMAT |
| | OF THE TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON NOVEMBER |
| | 18, 2011, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR SCHEDULING FOR THE |
| | DECEMBER 20, 2011 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (JANUARY 18, 2012), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE DATA TO SUPPORT THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT THAT "THE PROPERTY IS BETTER SERVED WITH A |
| | COMMERCIAL FLU DESIGNATION" AS OPPOSED TO RESIDENTIAL |
| | USE. THE DATA SHALL SHOW EXISTING VACANCY RATES FOR |
| | BOTH COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES, AS WELL AS AN |
| | ANALYSIS OF PAST AND FORECASTED ABSORPTION RATES FOR |
| | BOTH COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN A 2-3 MILE |
| | RADIUS OF THE SUBJECT SITE. PLEASE NOTE THAT IN 2005 |
| | THE CITY DETERMINED THAT THE APPROPRIATE FUTURE |
| | DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WAS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL |
| | USE. |
| | |
| | 2) THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION |
| | ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT SEVERAL ROADWAY SEGMENTS WOULD |
| | BE EXCEEDING THEIR ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) IF |
| | THIS PARCEL WERE TO BE DEVELOPED AT THE MAXIMUM |
| | DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED UNDER THE COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND |
| | USE DESIGNATION (212,355 SF OF RETAIL USES). WHILE THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THOSE SEGMENTS WOULD |
| | OPERATE AT THE ADOPTED LOS IF THE SITE IS DEVELOPED |
| | WITH A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 42,000 SF OF RETAIL, 5,000 SF |
| | OF DRIVE-IN BANK, AND 3,000 SF OF FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, |
| | THIS AMENDMENT STATES THAT OWNER WISHES TO MARKET THE |
| | PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL USES. SINCE |
| | THERE IS A SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE AND USES |
| | LISTED, STAFF WOULD NEED TO REVIEW THE SPECIFIC |
| | DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE USES AT THIS TIME. IF IN FACT |
| | THE SITE IS TO BE MARKETED FOR COMMERCIAL USE, THEN IT |
| | IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO LIMIT THE FUTURE LAND USE |
| | AMENDMENT TO A SPECIFIC SIZE AND MIX OF COMMERCIAL |
| | USES. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION |
| | ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED TO SHOW THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF |
| | COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD RESULT IN THE |
| | SURROUNDING ROADWAY SEGMENTS OPERATING AT THE ADOPTED |
| | LOS. THIS MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT |
| | SHALL BE EXPRESSED AS VEHICLE TRIPS, WHICH WOULD BE |
| | TIED TO THE FUTURE LAND USE IF ADOPTED BY THE CITY |
| | COMMISSION. AT THE TIME OF SITE DEVELOPMENT THE VEHICLE |
| | TRIPS WOULD BE CONVERTED TO SPECIFIC SQUARE FEET FOR |
| | SPECIFIC USES, SUBJECT TO AN APPROVED PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE COPIES OF THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT, THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND THE LOS ANALYSIS |
| | IN .WORD FORMAT. |
| |
Print |
