Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z11100008
Project Number Z11100008
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2011-12-08 16:33:56PLANNING FAILED
  
 PLEASE NOTE TO RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING
 1. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE INDICATE THE LENGTH OF THE
 BICYCLE PAD AREA IN THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL.
  
 2. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE BIKE PARKING
 INFORMATION IN THE SITE DATA TABLE
  
 3. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 BIKE PARKING PAD ON THE AREA WHERE IT IS IDENTIFIED ON
 THE SITE PLAN
  
 4. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE AMEND THE HANDICAPPED PARKING
 SPACES DETAIL AS IT INCLUDES INCORRECT STRIPE
 DIMENSIONS.
  
 5. SHEET SP-1 INCLUDES A "TEAMS/SCOREKEEPER AREA" TO
 THE EAST OF THE PHASE 1 SOCCER/LACROSSE GAME FIELD AND
 WITHIN THE 25? FRONT SETBACK. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT THE
 "TEAMS/SCOREKEEPER AREA" CONSISTS OF. NO STRUCTURES MAY
 BE LOCATED WITHIN FRONT SETBACK.
  
 6. SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE CODE STATES THAT "ANY
 OPERATION OR ACTIVITY PRODUCING GLARE SHALL BE
 CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR INDIRECT LIGHT FROM THE
 SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE ILLUMINATION IN EXCESS OF 0.5
 FOOT CANDLES WHEN MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT."
 THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS PROVIDED DO NOT IDENTIFY
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS FOR THE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL
 DISTRICTS RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 FOR OXBRIDGE. PLEASE AMEND THE PLAN TO IDENTIFY THE
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS
 TO THE WEST AND NORTH RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED
 OXBRIDGE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
  
 7. THE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN INDICATES THAT THE
 POLES FOR THE DIFFERENT ATHLETIC FIELDS HAVE HEIGHTS
 RANGING FROM 70 TO 80 FEET. SECTION 94-202 IDENTIFIES
 THAT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS)
 DISTRICT IS 60 FEET. SECTION 94-306 ALLOWS FOR CERTAIN
 FEATURES TO EXCEED DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY TEN
 PERCENT, WHICH WOULD RESULT IN A MAXIMUM PERMITTED
 HEIGHT OF 66 FEET. PLEASE AMEND THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IN
 ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 8. WHAT, IF ANY, LIGHTING IS BEING PROVIDED FOR THE
 PARKING AREA IN THE 1.48 ACRE PARCEL? IF ANY LIGHTING
 IS BEING PROPOSED PLEASE INCLUDED IT IN THE PHOTOMETRIC
 PLAN.
  
 9. ON SHEET LA-3 THERE ARE SOME CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE
 LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES AND THE LOCATIONS OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS
 CONFLICT.
  
 10. PLEASE CONSIDER PROVIDING THE PARKING SPACE
 OVERHANG INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOP WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT
 TO LANDSCAPING. LOOK AT ITEM 2 IN FIGURE XIV-2 (ARTICLE
 XIV) OF THE CODE.
  
 11. PLEASE VERIFY SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DIMENSIONS
 WHERE LIGHT POLES ARE ADJACENT TO HANDICAPPED SPACES IN
 THE PLAN.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THE PROPOSED
 PHASING OF THE PROJECT WOULD WORK, INCLUDING ACCESS TO
 THE DIFFERENT FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE DIFFERENT
 PHASES. OF PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION WOULD BE THE ACCESS
 TO THE GAME FIELD IDENTIFIED IN PHASE 1.
  
 13. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS IN
 THE AREA WHERE IT IS IDENTIFIED IN THE OVERALL SITE
 PLAN IN SHEET SP-1.
  
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF MOISTURE SENSING
 CONTROLLER IDENTIFIED IN THE XERISCAPE CALCULATIONS.
  
 15. IN THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, PLEASE CROSS-REFERENCE THE
 32 TREES THAT ARE BEING RELOCATED BY PROVIDING THEIR
 REFERENCE NUMBER USED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
  
 16. WHAT IS THE TIME FRAME FOR THE REMOVAL/RELOCATION
 OF THE TREES ON THE 1.5 ACRE PARCEL? PLEASE PROVIDE A
 REPLACEMENT PLAN FOR THE 153 TREES THAT ARE BEING
 IDENTIFIED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN (EXHIBIT A). IF
 TREES WILL NOT BE REMOVED IN NEAR FUTURE, THIS CAN BE
 PROVIDED DURING PREPARATION OF PHASE III.
  
 17. THERE APPEAR TO BE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE
 EXISTING TREE COUNT IN EXHIBIT A AND THE EXISTING COUNT
 INFORMATION IN CHART IN SHEET LA-1, PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 18. THERE APPEAR TO BE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE
 NUMBER OF TREES IDENTIFIED IN THE RELOCATION SUMMARY OF
 EXHIBIT A AND THE RELOCATION INFORMATION IN SHEET LA-6,
 PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 19. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION SUMMARY TABLE FOR
 THE 12.14 ACRE PARCEL AND INDICATE THE PROPOSED
 DISPOSITION OF THE 290 RELOCATED SABAL PALMS AND 254
 TREES IDENTIFIED IN TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP05-1013.
  
 20. SHEET LA 1 IDENTIFIES 6 EXISTING FLOWERING TREES
 FOR PHASE 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY THEM IN THE PLAN.
  
 21. PER SECTION 94-611 OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE 18 CRAPE MYRTLES
 IDENTIFIED IN SHEET LA-6 WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AS
 PROVIDED IN THE PLAN ARE NOT CONSIDERED A FLOWERING
 TREE AS IT HAS MULTI STEMS, WHICH IS INCOSISTENT WITH
 THE DEFINITION OF TREE.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME:
  
 ALEX HANSEN
 SENIOR PLANNER
 822-1463
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved