| Date |
Text |
| 2011-07-07 21:44:12 | PLANNING AND ZONING: *** FAILED, RESUBMITTAL 6/24/11 |
| | AND 6/30/11 **** |
| | |
| | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE |
| | |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT PB 993DDDDD |
| | IBIS GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB - MINOR PD AMENDMENT (IBIS |
| | ORCHID HAMMOCK-PARCEL STREETSCAPE - LANDSCAPE) |
| | |
| | P.C. N.: 74-41-42-25-11-000-0000 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN A WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 2. PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (PAGE 2) A |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MINOR AMENDMENT REQUIRES SIX (6) |
| | SETS OF LANDSCAPE/SITE PLANS ARE REQUIRED. THERE WERE |
| | ONLY THREE (3) SETS OF AERIALS FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE SIX (6) SETS AND |
| | LANDSCAPE/SITE PLANS AND SURVEYS. |
| | |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT: |
| | |
| | PROVIDE AN ACTUAL NUMBER OF TREES THAT AREA EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED, TAKE OUT ANY NOTATION |
| | SAYING "UP TO". FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 25 |
| | EXISTING OAK TREES, 23 WILL BE RELOCATED AND 2 WILL BE |
| | REMOVED (CUT DOWN)?ETC. |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL: REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WAS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | SURVEY/SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE SIX (6) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY, WHICH |
| | INCLUDES THE PROPERTY'S ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL: SMALL COPIES WILL SUFFICE |
| | |
| | 4. I. SITE PLAN & LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN - SEE THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST ON PAGE 14 OF |
| | THIS APPLICATION FOR THE REQUIRED INFORMATION; AND |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN - SEE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKLIST ON |
| | PAGE 16 OF THIS APPLICATION FOR THE REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT: ALL SITE PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL |
| | ALSO BE SUBMITTED IN .PNG GRAPHIC FORMAT. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | TWO (2) SETS OF REDUCED PLANS (1 SET 8 " X 11" AND 1 |
| | SET 11" X 17") SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE A REVISED COPY AS PART OF YOUR |
| | RESUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. PROVIDE PLANS OF THE AERIALS ON 24"X36" SHEETS, SO |
| | THAT IT DEPICTS MORE OF THE AREA TO BE WORKED ON (I.E. |
| | ALL SHEETS 11X14 SHEETS THAT WERE SUBMITTED). LABEL THE |
| | STREETSCAPE TREE REMOVAL & RELOCATION PLAN WITH A SHEET |
| | NUMBER. |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL: AERIALS WERE NOT INCLUDED. INCLUDE |
| | UPDATED COLORED AERIAL SHEETS WITH THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 6. SHOW ALL SITE DATA ON LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN; THIS |
| | INCLUDES WHAT IS REQUIRED AND WHAT IS PROVIDED. |
| | PERCENTAGES NEED TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE INFORMATION |
| | BELOW: |
| | |
| | PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442 (C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ("ZLDR"), PALM TREES MAY BE |
| | SUBSTITUTED FOR NOT MORE THAN 35 PERCENT OF THE SHADE |
| | OR FLOWERING TREES REQUIRED BY THIS ARTICLE, EXCEPT AS |
| | SPECIFIED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HOWEVER, WHEN PALM |
| | TREES ARE SUBSTITUTED FOR SHADE TREES, TWO PALM TREES |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH REQUIRED SHADE TREE. THIS |
| | 2:1 SUBSTITUTION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR ROYAL PALM |
| | TREES AND SUCKERING PALM TREES SUCH AS THE ARECA PALM, |
| | PAUROTIS PALM AND THE SENEGAL DATE PALM. |
| | |
| | THE "STREET TREE MITIGATION PLAN" SHEETS SUBMITTED |
| | SHOWING THE STATUS/CONDITION OF THE TREES (GREEN COLOR) |
| | AND TREE RELOCATION TABLE (BLUE COLOR) INFORMATION |
| | NEEDS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE SITE PLAN. CLARIFY THE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE "FINAL TAB." TABULATION IS? IT IS |
| | UNCLEAR WHERE THAT NUMBER WAS DERIVED FROM. FOR |
| | INSTANCE, IF THE EXISTING COUNT FOR THE OAK TREES IS |
| | 25, THEN 35% OF THAT WOULD EQUAL THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF |
| | TREES THAT MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH PALM TREES, SEE |
| | SECTION 94-442 ABOVE. THIS DOES NOT COUNT FOR THE |
| | OVERALL TREE CANOPY THAT NEEDS TO BE MITIGATED FOR THE |
| | SUBSTITUTED TREES. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED SIZE FOR THE |
| | ROYAL PALM AT INSTALLATION? THE "GREEN" MATRIX SHOWS A |
| | VARIATION OF 10' TO 30' QV MATURE? ON THE SITE DATA, |
| | SHOW HOW THE 13+ OAK TREES WILL COVER THE CANOPY THAT |
| | IS BEING LOST. THIS INCLUDES THE TWO (2) PROPOSED TO BE |
| | CUT DOWN. |
| | |
| | RESUBMITTAL: SEE COMMENT NUMBER 10. |
| | |
| | 7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D) (4) OF THE ZLDR, THE |
| | APPLICANT FOR A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED |
| | TO RELOCATE OR REPLACE TREES TO BE REMOVED TO ALLOW |
| | PROPERTY USE, DEVELOPMENT, OR REDEVELOPMENT. RELOCATED |
| | TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A SOUND AND SKILLED MANNER |
| | ACCORDING TO ACCEPTED PLANTING PRACTICES AND SHALL BE |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| | A. IF THE TREE IS TRANSPLANTED, IT SHALL BE MOVED BY |
| | THE PROPERTY OWNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL |
| | ARBORIST ASSOCIATION STANDARDS TO ANOTHER LOCATION |
| | WITHIN THE CITY AND MAINTAINED BY THE NEW PROPERTY |
| | OWNER. |
| | B. IF A TREE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY IS WILLFULLY DESTROYED |
| | BY ANYONE EXCEPT THE CITY FORESTER/ARBORIST, THE TREE |
| | MUST BE SUBSTITUTED WITH AN EQUIVALENT REPLACEMENT THAT |
| | IS APPROVED BY THE FORESTER/ARBORIST OR DESIGNER ON THE |
| | SITE FROM WHICH THE DESTROYED TREE WAS REMOVED. |
| | |
| | AFTER APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT THAT ALL DATA IS |
| | IN ADHERENCE WITH THE ZLDR, THEN A TREE ALTERATION |
| | PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING |
| | AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (ROBERT KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANNER) NOTE: THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE ALTERATION |
| | PERMIT NEED TO REFLECT THE SAME INFORMATION THAT IS |
| | BEING ASKED FOR THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 8. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (E) (1), CHARACTERISTICS. |
| | REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL HAVE SHADE AND SCREENING |
| | POTENTIAL EQUAL TO OR SUPERIOR TO THAT OF THE TREES |
| | THEY REPLACE AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 9. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (E) (2) MINIMUM |
| | STANDARDS. ALL REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR |
| | BETTER THAN FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1 |
| | NURSERY GRADE STANDARD. AL TREES REPLACED OR RELOCATED |
| | PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MUST BE IN A HEALTHY, LIVING |
| | CONDITION ONE YEAR FRO THE DATE OF PLANTING. |
| | REPLACEMENTS THAT ARE NOT ESTABLISHED, HAVE FAILED TO A |
| | DEGREE THAT SURVIVAL IS NOT PROBABLE, OR HAVE DIED MUST |
| | BE REPLACED WITH HEALTHY SPECIMENS. SUCH REPLACEMENTS |
| | MUST CONTINUE UNTIL A TREE IS ESTABLISHED AT THE |
| | APPROVED LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 10 PROVIDE THE TREE SIZE, HEIGHT INCLUDING THE TREE |
| | CALIPER, OVERALL HEIGHT AT INSTALLATION, ETC. ON THE |
| | SITE DATA INFORMATION OF WHAT THE PROPOSED TREES WILL |
| | BE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL 6/30/11: SHEET 1 OF 1, BASED ON |
| | ENGINEERING REVIEW AND COMMENTS (BRIAN MOREE) UPDATE |
| | PLANS TO REFLECT ONE LIVE OAK TO REMAIN IN PLACE #515 |
| | AND INFORMATION FOR CANOPY FOR THE REMOVAL THE #511 |
| | LIVE OAK (SHOW CANOPY SPREAD EXISTING AND REPLACEMENT |
| | TREES, CANOPY SIZE ON SITE DATA) COORDINATE WITH BOTH |
| | DEPARTMENTS IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION IN ONE RESUBMITTAL |
| | PACKET. INCLUDE RESPONSE LETTER TO REMANING COMMENTS. |
| | UPDATE, THE PRESERVE PLAN TO REFLECT MITIGATION |
| | (REPLACEMENT TREES) IF NEEDED BASED ON THE LATEST |
| | CHANGES. |
| | |
| | ONCE, THIS MINOR AMENDMENT IS APPROVED, THE SAME PLANS |
| | CAN BE USED FOR THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PERMITS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. |
| | |
| | LINDA MIA FRANCO |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | TEL: (561) 822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
