| Date |
Text |
| 2011-01-07 16:26:13 | CASE NO. PB1600C |
| | PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY |
| | FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NEW BUILDINGS |
| | 1957 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC |
| | COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PPRC MEETING |
| | (MARCH 12, 2011), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300). |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE SIGNED OWNERS CONSENT. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE COPIES OF THE UTILITY LETTERS THAT WERE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN APPLICATION, NOT THE |
| | CLASS B APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE PICTURES OF THE EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING |
| | (ONE BUILT IN 2000). THE NEW BUILDINGS THAT ARE PART OF |
| | THIS APPLICATION SHALL BLEND ARCHITECTURALLY WITH THE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE A NARRATIVE THAT DESCRIBES HOW THE |
| | ELEVATIONS WILL BE SHOWN TO THE COMMISSION AND THE |
| | NEIGHBORHOOD AS REQUIRED BY ORD. NO. 4303-10. |
| | |
| | 5) THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36 |
| | FEET. THE DATA TABLE LISTS THE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE |
| | NEW STRUCTURES AS 42 FEET. |
| | |
| | A. THE CITY MEASURES THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES FROM THE |
| | FINISHED GRADE NOT THE FINISHED FLOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS BASED ON THIS STANDARD. |
| | |
| | B. PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS FOR ALL ELEMENTS OF |
| | THE BUILDINGS (EX. TOPS OF PARAPETS AND OTHER |
| | ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS). |
| | |
| | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS AND |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHT (36 FEET) BY |
| | UP TO 10%, WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF |
| | THESE TO 39.5 FEET. |
| | |
| | 6) THE FLAGLER DRIVE ELEVATION OF THE ATHLETIC BUILDING |
| | DOES NOT RELATE APPROPRIATELY TO FLAGLER DRIVE. THE |
| | MAJORITY OF THE BUILDINGS ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE FACE |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE WITH SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF FENESTRATION. |
| | MORE FENESTRATION (NOT JUST ADDITIONAL GLASS BLOCK) IS |
| | REQUIRED ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS COULD BE |
| | ACCOMPLISHED BY ADDING WINDOWS ON THE UPPER PORTION OF |
| | THE FACADE TO MIMIC THE EDUCATION BUILDING. ADDITIONAL |
| | FENESTRATION SHOULD ALSO BE EXPLORED ON THE LOWER |
| | PORTION OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 7) THE WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS OF THE ATHLETIC |
| | BUILDING HAVE LARGE AREAS OF BLANK WALL WITH NO |
| | ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF. DETAILING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO |
| | BREAK UP THIS MASS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE EDUCATION BUILDING SHOWS |
| | A STRUCTURAL OVERHANG AT THE 2ND FLOOR. STRUCTURAL |
| | INTRUSIONS MAY PROJECT NO FURTHER THAN THREE (3) FEET |
| | INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS |
| | FOR THE OVERHANG ON BOTH THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND THE |
| | SITE PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THE OVERHANG IS NO CLOSER THAN |
| | 12 FEET FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 9) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE COVERED DROP-OFF. STAFF NEEDS |
| | TO REVIEW ELEVATION DRAWINGS, INCLUDING HEIGHT AND SIZE |
| | DIMENSIONS AND MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS DIFFICULT |
| | TO DETERMINE THE EXACT DIMENSIONS OF THE COVERED AREA |
| | ON THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS DUE TO MULTIPLE |
| | CROSSING LINES. |
| | |
| | 10) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED WALL ALONG FLAGLER |
| | DRIVE AND SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE, ESPECIALLY HEIGHT AND |
| | MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 11) PROVIDE THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE ALUMINUM GATES. |
| | ONLY THE ALUMINUM FENCING IS CALLED OUT AT FOUR (4) |
| | FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 12) THE PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND COLOR RENDERING ALL SHOW |
| | SIGNAGE. PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAILS SO STAFF MAY REVIEW |
| | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT THE SIGN |
| | PERMITTING PROCESS GOES SMOOTHLY. |
| | |
| | 13) PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TRANSFORMERS, |
| | GENERATORS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AC UNITS, AND OTHER |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND HOW IT WILL BE SCREENED BY |
| | LANDSCAPE OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. |
| | |
| | 14) PROVIDE THE LOCATION AND DETAILS OF ALL LIGHTING ON |
| | THE CAMPUS TO ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH |
| | PROPOSED OR EXISTING LANDSCAPE. THE LOCATIONS OF THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE PEDESTRIAN |
| | LIGHTS. |
| | |
| | 15) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | THE PLAN SHALL SHOW THAT LIGHT LEVELS DO NOT EXCEED 0.5 |
| | FOOT CANDLES AT THE NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIALLY ZONED |
| | PROPERTIES [SECTION 94-310(D)]. |
| | |
| | 16) THE BICYCLE RACK DETAILS (SITE DETAILS SHEET) SHALL |
| | ACCURATELY BE SHOWN AS IT IS PLANNED TO BE INSTALLED - |
| | SIX (6) SPACES AND CORRECT DIMENSIONS FOR SIX (6) |
| | SPACES. ADDITIONALLY, THE SITE AND CIVIL PLANS SHALL |
| | INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK (IT DOES NOT |
| | SCALE AS DEEP ENOUGH ON THE CIVIL PLAN) AND THE "FINAL |
| | LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED" LABEL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 17) THE "PROJECT TEAM" TABLES ON ALL PLANS SHALL BE |
| | UPDATED TO REFLECT CORRECT INFORMATION (EX. UNITY IS NO |
| | LONGER THE OWNER). |
| | |
| | 18) THE SETBACK PORTION OF THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO |
| | SEPARATELY STATE THE SETBACKS FOR THE PHASE I CLASSROOM |
| | BUILDINGS (NEW AND EXISTING), THE PHASE II BUILDING, |
| | THE PITT BUILDING AND THE RELOCATED BUILDING. THIS |
| | SHALL INCLUDE THE WAIVERS APPROVED AS PART OF ORD. NO. |
| | 4303-10. |
| | |
| | 19) THE SITE DATA TABLES ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS DO NOT LIST THE SAME DATA VALUES. ALL TABLES NEED |
| | TO AGREE. NEED TO DISCUSS A MORE EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION |
| | OF THE INFORMATION WITH STAFF. |
| | |
| | 20) PROVIDE DIMENSION LINES FROM THE INSIDE CURB TO |
| | INSIDE CURB FOR ALL PARKING ROWS ON BOTH THE SITE AND |
| | CIVIL PLANS. THIS DIMENSION SHALL MATCH THE DIMENSION |
| | OF THE SUM OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTHS (THIS DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO BE THE CASE WHEN THE PARKING AREA WITH THE |
| | BUS SPACES WAS SCALED ON THE CIVIL PLAN). |
| | |
| | 21) THE STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE SHIFTING OF THE |
| | WESTERN PARKING LOT TO AGAINST THE BUILDING. WHILE IT |
| | IS COMMENDABLE TO PROVIDE LARGER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR |
| | LARGER TREES, STAFF FEELS THAT IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO |
| | PROVIDE A GREATER BUFFER BETWEEN SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE AND |
| | THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT. ADDITIONALLY, THAT |
| | IS THE CONFIGURATION APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION BOARD. THE PROPOSED CONFIGURATION ALSO |
| | ELIMINATES THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND TREE FOR THE |
| | NORTH ROW OF PARKING. |
| | |
| | 22) THE COMPACT SPACES NEED TO BE ADDED TO THE PARKING |
| | DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| | 23) IF ALL SEVEN (7) VISITOR PARKING SPACES ARE |
| | OCCUPIED, WHERE WILL AN ADDITIONAL VISITOR PARK? HOW |
| | WILL THE VISITOR BE DIRECTED TO THAT PARKING SPACE? |
| | |
| | 24) SHOW ALL OF THE PROPOSED UTILITIES AND LIGHTING ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE SHALL BE NO CONFLICTS WITH |
| | EXISTING OR PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 25) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THE FORMAL |
| | SITE PLAN WILL BE THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN, SO PLEASE |
| | REMOVE "CONCEPTUAL" FROM THE TITLE. |
| | |
| | 26) THE LANDSCAPE DATA SHALL DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE |
| | PHASE I AND PHASE II LANDSCAPE INSTALLATIONS. PHASE II |
| | SHALL ONLY INCLUDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE |
| | ATHLETIC BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 27) THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAY AREA PARKING LOT |
| | SHALL BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AREA TO PROTECT |
| | THE EXISTING TREES ROOT SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 28) THE SIZE AND SPECIES OF ALL EXISTING AND RELOCATED |
| | TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH THIS APPLICATION |
| | WILL SERVE AS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OF RECORD, SO ALL |
| | DETAILS ARE NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 29) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A FIVE (5) FOOT LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE PITT |
| | BUILDING, YET THERE IS NO LANDSCAPE SHOWN IN THESE |
| | AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT |
| | SHOW AN AREA TO ACCOMMODATE LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 30) PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER DETAILS SHEET WITH THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN NOT THE MASTER PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER DETAIL SHEET CROSS SECTIONS DO NOT |
| | MATCH THE LOCATIONS DESIGNATED ON THE MASTER PLAN. SOME |
| | OF THEM DO NOT REFLECT THE LANDSCAPE PROPOSED ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 31) THE 25 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE HAS |
| | CHANGED FROM THE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS |
| | PART OF ORD. NO. 4303-10. THIS AREA IS TO HAVE UPLAND |
| | MEANDERING LANDSCAPE OR BE A BIOSWALE WITH APPROPRIATE |
| | MEANDERING LANDSCAPE. IT IS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED |
| | PLANS AS AN OPEN SODDED AREA, WHICH COMBINED WITH THE |
| | CIVIL PLAN'S PROPOSED DRAINAGE INDICATES THAT IT WILL |
| | BE A 25 FOOT WIDE UNLANDSCAPED SWALE. THIS IS NOT |
| | APPROPRIATE FOR A FLAGLER DRIVE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, NOR |
| | DOES IT MEET THE LANDSCAPE CODE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. |
| | THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE ATHLETIC BUILDING MAY |
| | NOT DOUBLE AS THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. |
| | |
| | 32) PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, ALL NEW TREES SHALL BE A |
| | MINIMUM OF 14 FEET IN HEIGHT AT INSTALLATION. NOT ALL |
| | OF THE TREES SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MEET THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 33) PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE RELOCATED PUBLIC |
| | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A |
| | DECORATIVE MATERIAL TO MIRROR ORANGE COURT. THE CIVIL |
| | PLAN SHOWS A CONCRETE SIDEWALK. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | CONDITION OF THE ORDINANCE. PROVIDE DETAILS TO SHOW |
| | THAT THE RELOCATED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT COMPLIES |
| | WITH THE ORDINANCE. |
| | |
| | 34) WILL THE NEW EDUCATION BUILDING SHARE THE ELEVATOR |
| | WITH THE EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING? |
| | |
| | 35) PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE OVERNIGHT BUS PARKING |
| | SPACES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | NEIGHBORHOOD. THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PROPOSED ALONG |
| | COCOANUT LANE, WEST OF THE BUS PARKING, DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCREENING OF THE BUSSES. THE MATERIAL |
| | SHALL BE OF A SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO SCREEN THE BUSSES AT |
| | INSTALLATION. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE INSTALLATION OF AN |
| | EIGHT (8) TO TEN (10) FOOT PODOCARPUS HEDGE. THE HEDGE |
| | SHOULD BE LOCATED AS CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED FENCE AS |
| | POSSIBLE. THE TREES SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN THE HEDGE |
| | AND THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. |
| | |
| | 36) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE |
| | FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE FIRST BUILDING |
| | PERMIT: |
| | |
| | A. PROVIDE THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT WITH A |
| | TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, APPROVED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEER, WHICH INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE TRAFFIC |
| | DIRECTING PERSONNEL AND A WRITTEN NARRATIVE HOW THE |
| | TRAFFIC CONTROL OPERATIONS WILL FUNCTION FOR THE |
| | PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF TIMES. THE COST TO CONSTRUCT, |
| | INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ANY OFF-SITE SIGNAGE OR TRAFFIC |
| | CONTROL AIDES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE PBDA. |
| | |
| | B. PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT |
| | PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME |
| | PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED) |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | C. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO |
| | RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW |
| | THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL |
| | REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT |
| | OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH |
| | THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | D. SUBMIT COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY PLANS TO THE FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | E. SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT |
| | WATER QUALITY IS BEING MAINTAINED FOR THE SITE AND THAT |
| | POST DEVELOPMENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE DOES NOT EXCEED THE |
| | PREDEVELOPMENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
