| Date |
Text |
| 2010-12-02 17:27:02 | PLANNING AND ZONING: |
| | |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | |
| | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE |
| | DECEMBER 18, 2010 |
| | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 934D |
| | 420 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | PALM BEACH MOTOR CARS DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT |
| | ("DSI") - FISKER SHOWROOM EXPANSION |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN A WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC |
| | COMMENTS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE PPRC MEETING, |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE RE-SUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE REVISIONS ADDRESSING PPRC COMMENTS NO LATER |
| | THAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2010, IN ORDER TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED TO THE JANUARY 18, 2010, PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING (ALL COMMENTS MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED), |
| | OTHERWISE, YOU WILL BE SCHEDULED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. RE-SUBMITTAL MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3. RESUBMITTAL FEE - FOLLOWING THE PLANS AND PLATS |
| | REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING, THE APPLICANT WILL BE |
| | PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT/GENERAL APPLICATION: |
| | |
| | 4. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - SECTION D - CONCURRENCY: |
| | |
| | D. CONCURRENCY: A TRAFFIC LETTER HAS NOT BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. IF SUCH A LETTER IS NOT SUBMITTED BY THE |
| | APPLICANT BY DECEMBER 17, 2010, THE PROJECT WILL NOT BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE JANUARY 18, 2010, AND WILL BE |
| | SCHEDULED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | ALL OTHER COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PER COMMENT #2 OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ESTABLISHING CONCURRENCY ARE |
| | REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | A. A TRAFFIC LETTER PROVIDED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION - (561) 684-4030. |
| | |
| | 5. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - SECTION E - PROJECT FACT |
| | SHEET: THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES NEED TO BE PROPERTIES |
| | THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE PALM BEACH MOTOR CARS DSI |
| | (I.E. PROPERTIES ACROSS OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND DIXIE |
| | HWY, ETC.) |
| | |
| | 6. THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY SHALL BE WITHIN ONE |
| | (1) YEAR OLD AND ACCOMPANIED BY A CURRENT OWNERSHIP AND |
| | ENCUMBRANCE (O & E) REPORT, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL |
| | EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, OR A CURRENT |
| | TITLE POLICY. |
| | |
| | A. THE SURVEY TITLE COMMITMENT IS OVER FIVE YEARS OLD |
| | (TITLE NOTE #1). |
| | |
| | B. PROVIDE GROSS LAND AREA (TO THE NEAREST |
| | ONE-HUNDREDTH (1/100) OF AN ACRE). |
| | |
| | 7. N. CITY SERVICE AND PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE |
| | TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION |
| | SERVICES. |
| | |
| | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND AT&T FLORIDA - |
| | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | 8. P. UNIFIED CONTROL |
| | |
| | FIRM EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL OF THE ENTIRE |
| | AREA WITHIN THE PETITION AND A STATEMENT FROM THE |
| | APPLICANT STATING THAT IF THE LAND IS DEVELOPED, THE |
| | APPLICANT SHALL: |
| | |
| | 1. DO SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASTER PLAN OF |
| | DEVELOPMENT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED FOR THE DISTRICT, IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS EXISTING WHEN THE |
| | AMENDMENT CREATING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) |
| | DISTRICT OR SPECIAL USE IS PASSED AND IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SUCH OTHER CONDITIONS OR MODIFICATIONS AS MAY BE |
| | ATTACHED TO THE REZONING OF THE LAND TO THE PD |
| | CLASSIFICATIONS OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, DEED RESTRICTIONS, OR |
| | SURETIES ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY FOR COMPLETION OF THE |
| | UNDERTAKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED MASTER PLAN |
| | AS WELL AS FOR THE CONTINUING FUNCTIONS AND FACILITIES |
| | AS ARE TO BE PROVIDED, OPERATED OR MAINTAINED AT |
| | GENERAL PUBLIC EXPENSES; AND |
| | |
| | 3. BIND ALL DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSORS IN TITLE TO ANY |
| | COMMITMENTS MADE UNDER (1) AND (2) PRECEDING. |
| | |
| | A WRITTEN LETTER OF UNIFIED CONTROL FROM THE APPLICANT |
| | IS NOT SUFFICIENT. A UNITY CONTROL BINDING ALL |
| | DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSORS IN TITLE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT. |
| | BASED ON DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY'S SURVEYOR (VINCE |
| | NOEL), STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT A UNITY TITLE IS NOT AN |
| | OPTION DUE TO THE CITY-OWNED "U-SHAPE" LAND THAT IS |
| | LOCATED BETWEEN THE LANDS THAT ARE OWNED BY THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | 9. THERE ARE SQUARE FOOTAGE DISCREPANCIES WITH THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT REGARDING EXISTING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE AND PROPOSED EXPANSION (I.E. 1,786 PLUS THE |
| | ADDITION OF 2,769 SQ.FT FOR A TOTAL OF 4,555 SQ.FT |
| | (THERE ISNO MENTION OF TOTAL PB MOTORCARS SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE) IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. THE LETTER |
| | FROM THE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT, LINDA RICCARDI, P.E. |
| | (SHOWS EXISTING DEALERSHIP AT 50,478 SQ,FT WITH A 2,013 |
| | SQ. FT. EXPANSION FOR THE FISKER SHOWROOM FOR A TOTAL |
| | OF 52, 491 SQ.FT.) AND THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S |
| | EXISTING BUILDINGS' SQUARE FOOTAGE INFORMATION |
| | (+/-59,365 SQ. FT). ALL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ALL |
| | BUILDINGS NEEDS TO BE CORRELATED AND INCLUDED IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND TRAFFIC LETTER (SHOW |
| | EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ADDITIONAL "FISKER |
| | SHOWROOM" EXPANSION SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 10. SHEET SP-2 - PROVIDE ALL SITE DATA OF WHAT IS |
| | REQUIRED VERSUS PROVIDED. THE BREAKDOWN FOR THE |
| | LANDSCAPING REQUIRED AND PROVIDED SHALL ALSO BE |
| | PROVIDED ON PERTINENT LANDSCAPE PLANS, INCLUDING |
| | XERISCAPE DATA INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | A. PROVIDE BREAKDOWN OF REQUIRED VERSUS PROVIDED |
| | PARKING FOR THE ADDITION FOR THE FISKER SHOWROOM AND |
| | BREAKDOWN THE OUTDOOR AREA IN PARCEL 3 ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 11. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS ENCROACHING INTO THE ADA |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. REVISE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 12. DELINIATE THE LOCATION OF THE ADA ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING, DIMENSION OF VEHICLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS ON THE SITE PLAN. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND |
| | DELINEATE AREAS TO ASCERTAIN IF ADEQUATE MANEUVERING |
| | HAS BEEN PROVIDED. WHERE IS THE BACK-UP AREA FROM EACH |
| | SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO TURN-AROUND? THERE ARE DEAD-END |
| | SPACES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FISKER SHOWROOM BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 13. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A LARGER DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND |
| | EXPANSION THAT SHOWS SETBACKS FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES |
| | (I.E. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN) SHEET SP-3 HAS TOO MUCH TEXT |
| | AND INFORMATION AND THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING IS |
| | NOT LEGIBLE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 14. SHEET A- 3.0 - ENLARGE ELEVATION DIMENSIONS (THEY |
| | ARE NOT LEGIBLE). |
| | |
| | 15. LANDSCAPE PLANS - PROVIDE XERISCAPE DATA ON |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS AND ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS NOTED BY |
| | ROBERT KUSSNER (LANDSCAPE REVIEWER). |
| | |
| | |
| | LINDA MIA FRANCO, |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | TEL: (561) 822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
