| Date |
Text |
| 2010-07-13 16:22:23 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | |
| | CASE NO.: ZBA CASE NO. 3270 (Z10060015) |
| | ADDRESS: 4001 SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: LAND DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM, LLC |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.568.8397 |
| | SCOPE OF APPLICATION: NEW FULL-SERVICE CAR WASH |
| | FACILITY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE RECORDED DEED |
| | INDICATING THE OWNER AS ???CENTER STREET WIFE TRUCK |
| | HOLDING, LLC???. AN EXECUTED DEED WAS PROVIDED, HOWEVER |
| | IT DOES NOT INDICATE IT BEING RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS, AND THE PROPERTY APPRAISER???S OFFICE STILL |
| | INDICATES THE CURRENT OWNER AS ???TIGER INVESTMENTS |
| | GROUP, INC.???. |
| | |
| | 2. THE PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER AFFIDAVIT SHOULD NOT BE |
| | SIGNED/NOTARIZED UNTIL THE MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT. |
| | STAFF WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE MAILER AND INDICATE THE |
| | DATE BY WHICH THEY NEED TO BE SENT BY. UPON MAILING THE |
| | NOTICE, THE AFFIDAVIT SHOULD THEN BE SIGNED AND |
| | NOTARIZED INDICATING THE DATE WHEN THIS OCCURRED. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE UTILITY LETTERS FROM AT&T AND THE |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 4. PURSUANT TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (ZBA) |
| | APPLICATION, THE SURVEY SHALL BE AN ALTA/ACSM SURVEY |
| | THAT PROVIDES ALL IMPROVEMENTS LISTED IN THE |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 5. ACCORDING THE UTILITY LETTER PROVIDED BY FLORIDA |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES, THERE IS A GAS LINE WITHIN AN |
| | EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE???THIS IS NOT |
| | REFLECTED ON THE SURVEY, AND WILL REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS |
| | TO THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICT. IF |
| | FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN SUCH EASEMENT, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A RELEASE INDICATING SUCH. |
| | |
| | 6. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT A WAIVER |
| | IS BEING REQUESTED REGARDING THE SIZE OF THE TRASH |
| | RECEPTACLE AND ENCLOSURE. NO WAIVER IS REQUIRED, |
| | HOWEVER, AN APPROVAL LETTER, AS WELL AS AN APPROVED SET |
| | OF PLANS, SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE CITY???S |
| | SANITATION DEPARTMENT INDICATING APPROVAL OF THE SIZE |
| | AND LOCATION OF THE TRASH RECEPTACLES. |
| | |
| | 7. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT A WAIVER |
| | IS BEING REQUESTED FROM THE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT. |
| | THIS PROVISION CANNOT BE WAIVED. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE REMOVE THE EMERGENCY EGRESS THAT IS PROVIDED |
| | ALONG SOUTHERN BOULEVARD. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-313(1) |
| | OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | (ZLDRS), COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS OF THIS SIZE SHALL |
| | ONLY BE PERMITTED ONE (1) INGRESS/EGRESS POINT, WHICH |
| | CORNER LOTS BEING PERMITTED ONE (1) ADDITIONAL INGRESS |
| | POINT (2 POINTS TOTAL). |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INDICATING THEIR REVIEW |
| | AND APPROVAL OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SOUTHERN |
| | BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING SIZE AND LOCATION OF |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 10. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT A WAIVER |
| | IS BEING REQUESTED FROM THE ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | SETBACKS. NO SUCH WAIVER IS REQUIRED AS THESE |
| | ADDITIONAL SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF |
| | THE ROADWAY, NOT THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 11. THE RESPONSES TO THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS INDICATES |
| | THAT THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDINGS, SIGNS, ETC. |
| | IS NOT APPLICABLE; THIS PROVISION DOES APPLY AND IF |
| | UNABLE TO CONFORM TO MINIMUM 25 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE |
| | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 12. THE RESPONSES TO THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS INDICATES |
| | THAT THE SALE OF CONVENIENCE STORE ITEMS IS NOT |
| | APPLICABLE; ARE NO CONVENIENCE ITEMS BEING SOLD IN THE |
| | WAITING AREA? IF SUCH ITEMS ARE GOING TO BE SOLD, |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THIS AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA |
| | FOR SUCH USE. |
| | |
| | 13. THE RESPONSES TO THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS, AND THE |
| | SITE PLAN, INDICATE THE EXISTING FENCE IS PROPOSED TO |
| | REMAIN. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-273(D)(46)(B)(9) OF THE |
| | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | (ZLDRS), AN OPAQUE WALL SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. |
| | |
| | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF |
| | OPERATION???STAFF WILL BE RECOMMENDING THAT THE HOURS |
| | BE RESTRICTED TO 6:00AM TO 10:00PM. |
| | |
| | 15. THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN IS |
| | INCORRECT. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 16. THE SITE DATE TABLE NEEDS PROVIDE THE PROPOSED |
| | PERCENTAGES OF IMPERVIOUS, PERVIOUS, BUILDING COVERAGE, |
| | OPEN SPACE, ETC. |
| | |
| | 17. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SITE AREA DOES NOT MATCH |
| | THAT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 18. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATE TABLE |
| | REGARDING THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 19. THE ???STANDARD ANGLED PARKING DETAIL??? SHOWN ON |
| | THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | STANDARDS FOR THE CITY. PLEASE REMOVE, AS THERE IS |
| | ANOTHER PARKING STALL DETAIL, OR ADJUST ACCORDINGLY TO |
| | MEET THE MINIMUM CRITERIA (CORRECT DIMENSIONS, |
| | DOUBLE-STRIPING, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 20. AS PROPOSED, THERE IS NO WAY TO ACCESS THE PARKING |
| | ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING FROM SOUTH OLIVE |
| | AVENUE BECAUSE OF THE ONE-WAY DESIGNATION. THE ONE-WAY |
| | DESIGNATION SHOULD BE MOVED FURTHER WEST NEAR THE |
| | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 21. THE SECOND SPACE IN FROM THE EAST END OF THE CANOPY |
| | IS ONLY EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. PLEASE ADJUST |
| | ACCORDINGLY TO MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIRED (8.5 |
| | FEET). |
| | |
| | 22. PLEASE NOTE THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING FENCE THAT |
| | IS PROPOSED TO REMAIN. |
| | |
| | 23. THE DIMENSION SHOWN FOR THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES |
| | IS INCORRECT. THE DIMENSION LINE INDICATES 9 FEET IN |
| | WIDTH, WHILE IT ONLY MEASURES AT 8.5 FEET. |
| | |
| | 24. THE DIMENSION SHOWN FOR THE LENGTH OF THE STANDARD |
| | PARKING SPACES IS INCORRECT. THE DIMENSION LINE |
| | INDICATES 18.5 FEET, WHILE IT ONLY MEASURES AT 18 FEET. |
| | |
| | 25. PLEASE CLARIFY THE NOTE IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER |
| | INDICATING ???HANDICAP ACCESS TO PUBLIC R/W???. IT |
| | APPEARS TO BE POINTING IN THE WRONG LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 26. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-145(2)(B) OF THE CITY???S |
| | ZLDRS, CORNER SIDE SETBACKS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) FEET; PLANS ONLY INDICATE FOUR (4) FEET. |
| | |
| | 27. ALL SETBACKS NOTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE MEASURED TO |
| | THE POINT ALONG THE BUILDING THAT IS CLOSEST TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. IT APPEARS THAT SOME DIMENSION LINES ARE |
| | NOT MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST POINT. |
| | |
| | 28. PLEASE CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT ANY SITE |
| | LIGHTING IS BEING INSTALLED. IF SO, IT SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH SECTION 94-309(A) AND SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE |
| | CITY???S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 29. PLEASE CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT ANY |
| | FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE PROPOSED. THERE DOES NOT APPEAR |
| | TO BE ANY SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 30. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACKS. |
| | SUCH RACKS SHALL CONFORM TO THE ATTACHED |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS. |
| | |
| | 31. PLEASE CLARIFY AS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | VACUUMS AND WHAT DOCUMENTATION REGARDING NOISE |
| | MITIGATION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH. |
| | 32. PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE CARS WILL BE STORED FOLLOWING |
| | COMPLETION AND PRIOR TO PICK-UP? SUCH CARS SHALL NOT |
| | IMPEDE WITH ON-SITE CIRCULATION, ETC. |
| | |
| | 33. STACKING INTO THE CAR WASH SHALL NOT BLOCK THE |
| | SIDEWALK. AS DESIGNED IT LOOKS LIKE THIS IS A VERY |
| | LIKELY SCENARIO. |
| | |
| | 34. PLEASE REVISE THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO BETTER |
| | ENHANCE THE WEST FACADE OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. THIS |
| | FACADE IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FOR EAST-BOUND TRAFFIC ON |
| | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD AND SHOULD PROVIDE A BETTER |
| | APPEARANCE TO THE STREET. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1435 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1459 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
| | |
| |
Print |
