| Date |
Text |
| 2010-06-08 15:26:45 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** |
| | |
| | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (A) (2), THE REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT SEPARATES A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY |
| | FROM A NONRESIDENTIAL USE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | FEET IN WIDTH. IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED HEDGE, ONE |
| | SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 30 |
| | LINEAR FEET OR PORTION THEREOF. THE PERIMETER BUFFER |
| | ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE TOWARD THE EAST END |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. BECAUSE THE OLD |
| | BUILDING IS BEING REMOVED, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE |
| | PARKING LOT BE SHIFTED TOWARD THE SOUTH TO ALLOW FOR |
| | THE REQUIRED BUFFER AND TREES. |
| | |
| | 2. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE HEDGE ADJACENT TO THE |
| | DRIVE AISLE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE BE |
| | ELIMINATED. THE HEDGE, IF ALLOWED TO GROW IN HEIGHT, |
| | WOULD PROVIDE AN AREA FOR CRIME BECAUSE OF THE LACK FO |
| | VISIBILITY FROM THE REST OF THE SITE. IF AN INFORMAL |
| | SITTING AREA IS THE INTENDED USE FOR THIS SECTION OF |
| | THE SITE, PERHAPS A LOW PICKET FENCE WITH OPEN SPACE |
| | BETWEEN THE SLATS WOULD BE A BETTER SOLUTION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT WILL BE |
| | PLANTED AT THE END OF PHASE ONE, ONCE THE OLD BUILDING |
| | HAS BEEN REMOVED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR |
| | THE ENTIRE SITE FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED PHASES. |
| | |
| | 4. ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE CONCERNS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT |
| | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
| |
Print |
