| Date |
Text |
| 2010-06-08 13:54:10 | CASE NO. PB 1600A |
| | PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT CREATION |
| | 1901, 1925, 1957 S. FLAGLER & TUXEDO LANE PROPERTIES |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL |
| | PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 PM |
| | ON JUNE 18, 2010, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 20, 2010 |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC |
| | COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC |
| | MEETING (AUGUST 9, 2010), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | 1) THE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY REQUEST LETTER SUBMITTED TO |
| | PB COUNTY ENGINEERING IS ONLY FOR THE "290 STUDENT |
| | INTERIM PLAN". SINCE THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING ZONING |
| | APPROVALS FOR 360 STUDENTS, IT NEEDS TO PROVIDE A |
| | TRAFFIC STATEMENT LETTER FROM THE PB COUNTY TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEERING DIVISION INDICATING THAT THE 360-STUDENT |
| | PROPOSAL MEETS ARTICLE 12 OF THE COUNTY'S TRAFFIC |
| | PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE MAP FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER SHOWING THE 400 FOOT NOTIFICATION AND A COPY |
| | OF THE ADDRESS LIST WAS NOT INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE COPIES OF THE CITY AND UTILITY SERVICE |
| | PROVIDER LETTERS. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE COPY OF ORB 793 PG 178 - THE ABANDONMENT OF |
| | THE WALKWAY TO NORTH OF PROPERTY. NOTE: IT APPEARS FROM |
| | THE SURVEY THAT FENCE AND SOME OF NORTHERN SCHOOL |
| | FEATURES ARE ON THE RAPALLO SOUTH PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 5) THE NEW DUMPSTER LOCATION REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE |
| | SANITATION DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 6) THE RELOCATED DUMPSTER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A HEDGE |
| | AROUND THE ENCLOSURE. THIS IS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL, BUT |
| | NOT ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7) THE RELOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER REMOVES TWO (2) |
| | NON-CONFORMING PARKING SPACES FROM THE SITE. THE MASTER |
| | PLAN INCORRECTLY CALLS OUT THREE (3) EXISTING PARKING |
| | SPACES AT THIS LOCATION AND COUNTS THEM IN THE DATA |
| | TABLE, BUT NONE ARE SHOWN. PARKING SPACES MAY NOT BE |
| | RECONSTRUCTED AT THIS SITE UNLESS THEY CONFORM TO ALL |
| | CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8) DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM CITY |
| | STANDARDS. THE SETBACK FROM THE ENCLOSURE TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE PROVIDED. A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) |
| | FEET IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PARKING TABLE SHOWS 61 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, |
| | YET THERE ARE 58 PARKING SPACES PHYSICALLY SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLANS. THE DISCREPANCY APPEARS TO BE IN THE THREE (3) |
| | SPACES REMOVED FOR THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 10) PROVIDE PARKING SPACE DETAILS FOR ALL OF THE |
| | PARKING CONFIGURATIONS ON THE PLANS (ONLY 90 DEGREE |
| | INCLUDED). PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE PARKING SPACES, THE |
| | PARKING SPACE ANGLE, AND THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DRIVE |
| | AISLES ON THE PLANS. THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES APPEAR |
| | TO BE LARGER THAN CITY STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 11) THE 58 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED REQUIRE THREE (3) |
| | ADA PARKING SPACES. ADA SPACES MAY NEED TO BE |
| | DISTRIBUTED EVENLY AMONG THE PARKING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 12) A TURN AROUND SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR THE PARKING LOT |
| | EAST OF COCOANUT LANE. THIS BECOMES A DEAD-END PARKING |
| | SITUATION DURING SCHOOL HOURS WHEN THE GATE IS CLOSED. |
| | |
| | 13) BACK OUT PARKING DIRECTLY ON TO A STREET IS |
| | PROHIBITED BY SECTION 94-485(J)(1). THIS MAY NOT BE |
| | WAIVED AS PART OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL |
| | PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 14) THE WESTERNMOST PARKING SPACE IN THE SOUTH OLIVE |
| | AVENUE PARKING AREA DOES NOT FUNCTION. THIS FURTHER |
| | REDUCES THE PARKING COUNT. |
| | |
| | 15) STAFF HAS REPEATEDLY STATED THAT THE PARKING LOT |
| | SHALL BE SCREENED WITH A BUILDING, NOT AN ARCHITECTURAL |
| | FEATURE, WALL OR HEDGE, TO MAINTAIN THE BUILDING LINE |
| | ALONG SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE. |
| | |
| | 16) ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR EACH 20 |
| | PARKING SPACES. PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE |
| | PARKING. THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAILS SHALL MATCH WHAT |
| | IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 17) ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF "NO LEFT TURN SIGNS" |
| | IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY IS |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF FABRICATION, INSTALLATION |
| | AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 18) AN APPLICATION IS TO BE FILED WITH THE ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO RELOCATE THE PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN |
| | WALKWAY EASEMENT AND TO ABANDON THE CROSS ACCESS AND |
| | UTILITY EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PLAN. THE |
| | CITY COMMISSION SHALL DETERMINE IF THE RELOCATION IS |
| | APPROPRIATE. |
| | |
| | 19) THE MASTER PLAN CALLS OUT AN EXISTING FIVE (5) FOOT |
| | WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER NORTHWEST CORNER OF SITE, BUT |
| | BUFFER IS ONLY TWO (2) FEET WIDE ON PLANS AND SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 20) THE SITE DATA TABLE IS MISLEADING AS TO THE SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE TOTALS AT MASTER PLAN BUILD OUT. THE MAXIMUM |
| | BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND SQUARE FOOTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | FOR EACH NEW BUILDING SO THAT THEY CAN BE INCORPORATED |
| | AT THE TIME OF FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE NORTHERN |
| | MAX SETBACK FOR THE EDUCATION BUILDING IS ALSO |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 21) PROVIDE THE PREVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AND LANDSCAPE |
| | PERCENTAGE NUMBERS AND LANDSCAPE DATA COUNTS (TREES AND |
| | SHRUBS REQUIRED) ON THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE WORST CASE |
| | FOOTPRINT BUILD-OUT. STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY NUMBERS |
| | AGAINST THE CSPD REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 22) WHAT MATERIAL WILL THE PEDESTRIAN PATH BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED OUT OF? |
| | |
| | 23) WHY ARE THERE BENCH AND TRASH CAN DETAILS PROVIDED? |
| | WHERE ARE THESE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED? |
| | |
| | 24) WAIVER TABLE ON MASTER PLAN DOES NOT APPLY ONCE THE |
| | PROPERTY IS REZONED TO A CSPD. PLEASE REMOVE. |
| | |
| | 25) WHAT WILL THE PROPOSED WALL ON FLAGLER DRIVE AND |
| | THE FENCES LOOK LIKE? THE PLANS DO NOT SPECIFY |
| | MATERIALS OR FOR THE FENCE, HEIGHT IN ALL INSTANCES. |
| | WHY DOES THE JUSTIFICATION STATE THE PARKING WILL HAVE |
| | NO FENCE AND THAT ALL FENCING WILL BE SET BACK FROM |
| | ORANGE COURT, YET THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A CHAIN LINK |
| | FENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE SOUTH OF THE SOUTH OLIVE |
| | AVENUE PARKING AREA? |
| | |
| | 26) WHERE WILL THE SANITARY LINE THAT CURRENTLY PASSES |
| | UNDER THE UNITY BUILDING BE RELOCATED TO? ADDITIONALLY, |
| | WHO IS SERVED BY THE PIPE OUTFALL THAT IS PROPOSED TO |
| | BE ABANDONED? |
| | |
| | 27) NOTE: THE TREE PALETTE NEEDS TO BE DEFINED FOR THE |
| | BUFFERS AND INTERIOR TREES. THERE ARE OVERHEAD LINES |
| | AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN MANY LOCATIONS ON AND |
| | ADJACENT TO THE SITE. THE PROPOSED TREES NEED TO TAKE |
| | INTO ACCOUNT THESE FEATURES (I.E. FPL RIGHT TREE RIGHT |
| | PLACE). |
| | |
| | 28) THE PROPOSED REMOVAL OF THE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE |
| | MANGO PROMENADE HISTORIC DISTRICT REQUIRES HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION BOARD APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 29) WAIVERS: |
| | |
| | A. NEED NOTARIZED WAIVER FROM RAPALLO AND ANNE NORTON |
| | SCULPTURE GARDEN FOR THE WALL REQUIRED BETWEEN |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | B. FIVE (5) FOOT BUFFER ALONG RIGHTS-OF-WAY MAY NOT BE |
| | INTERRUPTED BY MORE THAN 25%. PROVIDE THE INFORMATION |
| | ON THE LINEAR FEET OF PROPERTY LINE, THE LINEAR FEET OF |
| | INTERRUPTION AND THE PERCENTAGE FOR TUXEDO AND COCOANUT |
| | LANES. |
| | |
| | C. THE PROVISION OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. NOTE - |
| | THE CALCULATIONS FOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE WERE NOT |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | D. THE COVERED DROP-OFF IS WITHIN THE REQUIRED 15 FOOT |
| | SIDE SETBACK REQUIRED IN A CSPD. |
| | |
| | E. INCORRECT WAIVER REQUEST - ONLY A FIVE (5) FOOT |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS |
| | AND PARKING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
